구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.169-175
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

여러 레진계 치아고정 재료의 굴곡강도 및 탄성계수 비교

Comparison of flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in several resinous teeth splinting materials

  • 유제인 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김수연 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Yoo, Je-In (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Soo-Yeon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Batbayar, Bayarchimeg (Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.31
  • 심사 : 2016.08.08
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 수종의 레진계 치아고정 재료의 굴곡강도와 탄성계수를 비교 분석하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 레진계 치아고정 재료로 Super-Bond C&B (SB), G-FIX (GF), G-aenial Universal Flo (GU), Filtek Z350 XT (FZ)를 이용하여 각 군당 15개씩 총 60개의 시편을 제작하였다. 3점 굽힘 시험으로 측정된 값에 따라 굴곡강도와 탄성계수를 계산하였다. 실험값은 One-way ANOVA test로 분석하고, Scheffe's test로 사후 검정하였다. 결과: 본 연구의 결과 SB는 다른 재료들과 비교 시 가장 낮은 굴곡강도를 보였으며 GF, GU, FZ는 비슷하게 높은 굴곡강도를 보였다. 탄성계수의 경우 SB가 가장 낮은 값을 보였고 GF는 SB보다는 높지만 GU와 FZ보다는 낮은 탄성계수를 보였으며 GU와 FZ는 유의하게 높은 탄성계수를 보였다. 결론: 동요치 고정을 목적으로 새로 개발된 GU (G-FIX)는 유동성 복합 레진과 수복용 복합 레진과 같이 높은 강도를 보이며 잘 파절되지 않으면서도 상대적으로 유연한 성질을 보여 동요치 고정에 유리할 것으로 사료된다.

Purpose: Direct splinting material should have high flexural strength to withstand force during mastication and low modulus of elasticity to provide some movement while force applied for relief of stress. The purpose of this study was to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of several resinous splinting materials. Materials and Methods: Four materials; Super-Bond C&B, G-FIX, G-aenial Universal Flo, FiltekTM Z350 XT; were used in this study. Fifteen rectangular bar specimens of each material were prepared. Three-point bending test were performed to determine physical properties. Maximum load at fracture was recorded and flexural strength and modulus of elasticity were calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe's tests at a 0.05 level of significance were conducted on all test results. Results: Statistical analysis reveals that Super-Bond C&B had significant low mean value for flexible strength and the other three materials showed no significant difference. For modulus of elasticity, Super-Bond C&B exhibited statistically lower modulus of elasticity. G-FIX presented intermediate result, showing statistically higher modulus of elasticity than Super-Bond C&B but lower than G-aenial Universal Flo and FiltekTM Z350 XT. There was no significant difference on modulus of elasticity between G-aenial Universal Flo and FiltekTM Z350 XT. Conclusion: Using a G-FIX, the newly commercially available splinting material, which shows higher fracture resistance properties comparable to flowable and restorative composite resin and a relatively flexible nature might be a beneficial for stabilizing teeth mobility.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bernal G, Carvajal JC, Munoz-Viveros CA. A review of the clinical management of mobile teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002;3:10-22.
  2. Mazzoleni S, Meschia G, Cortesi R, Bressan E, Tomasi C, Ferro R, Stellini E. In vitro comparison of the flexibility of different splint systems used in dental traumatology. Dent Traumatol 2010;26:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00843.x
  3. Wood M, Kern M, Thompson VP, Romberg E. Ten-year clinical and microscopic evaluation of resin-bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27: 803-7.
  4. Burcak Cengiz S, Stephan Atac A, Cehreli ZC. Biomechanical effects of splint types on traumatized tooth: a photoelastic stress analysis. Dent Traumatol 2006;22:133-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00339.x
  5. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Mejare I, Cvek M. Healing of 400 intra-alveolar root fractures. 2. Effect of treatment factors such as treatment delay, repositioning, splinting type and period and antibiotics. Dent Traumatol 2004;20:203-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00278.x
  6. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. 4th ed. Oxford; Blackwell Munksgaard; 2007. p. 842-9.
  7. von Arx T. Splinting of traumatized teeth with focus on adhesive techniques. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005;33:409-14.
  8. Bauss O, Schwestka-Polly R, Schilke R, Kiliaridis S. Effect of different splinting methods and fixation periods on root development of autotransplanted immature third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:304-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.056
  9. von Arx T, Filippi A, Lussi A. Comparison of a new dental trauma splint device (TTS) with three commonly used splinting techniques. Dent Traumatol 2001;17:266-74. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170605.x
  10. Filippi A, von Arx T, Lussi A. Comfort and discomfort of dental trauma splints-a comparison of a new device (TTS) with three commonly used splinting techniques. Dent Traumatol 2002;18:275-80. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00121.x
  11. Prevost J, Granjon Y. An in vitro study of the passivity of splints in dental trauma. J Dent 1998;26: 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00069-3
  12. Prevost J, Nivoit M, Granjon Y. Management of dental trauma: development of a 2D data acquisition system to evaluate passivity of dental splints. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997;35:409-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534099
  13. Menendez ME, Thornton E, Kent S, Kalajian T, Ring D. A prospective randomized clinical trial of prescription of full-time versus as-desired splint wear for de Quervain tendinopathy. Int Orthop 2015;39:1563-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2779-6
  14. Monteiro GQ, Montes MA. Evaluation of linear polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of dental composites. Mater Res 2010;13:51-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000100012
  15. Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1022-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00809.x
  16. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis; Saunders; 2003. p. 410.
  17. Kawaguchi M, Fukushima T, Horibe T. Effect of monomer structure on the mechanical properties of light-cured unfilled resins. Dent Mater J 1988;7: 174-81. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.7.174
  18. Chang M, Dennison J, Yaman P. Physical property evaluation of four composite materials. Oper Dent 2013;38:E144-53. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-203-L
  19. Azillah MA, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 1998;26:177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00089-9
  20. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:516-21.
  21. Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 2000;25:113-20.
  22. Yap AU, Teoh SH. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:171-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01004.x

피인용 문헌

  1. 동요치 고정에 사용되는 복합레진의 색품질 평가 vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7469/jksqm.2017.45.4.995
  2. 수분 흡수가 여러 레진계 치아고정 재료의 굴곡강도와 탄성계수에 미치는 영향 vol.34, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.2.72
  3. 레진계 치아 스플린팅 재료들의 중합능력 평가 vol.34, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.290
  4. 법랑질 표면 처리방법에 따른 레진계 치아 고정재료의 접착강도 비교 vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.2.72
  5. Characteristics according to the Amount of HAp Added in Resin for Tooth Repair vol.56, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4191/kcers.2019.56.6.02