DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Listeria Species in Broiler Poultry Farms: Potential Public Health Hazards

  • Dahshan, Hesham (Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University) ;
  • Merwad, Abdallah Mohamed Amin (Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University) ;
  • Mohamed, Taisir Saber (Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University)
  • Received : 2016.03.31
  • Accepted : 2016.06.10
  • Published : 2016.09.28

Abstract

Broiler meat production worldwide has been plagued by lethal food-poisoning bacteria diseases, including listeriosis. A fatality rate of 15.6% was recorded in human beings in the EU in 2015. During 2013, a total of 200 poultry farm samples, including litter, chicken breast, farm feed, and drinking water, were collected to generate baseline data for the characterization of the genus Listeria in broiler poultry farms. Listeria spp. were detected in a total of 95 (47.5%) poultry farm samples. The isolates of Listeria spp. included L. innocua (28.5%), L. ivanovii (12.5%), L. welshimeri (4.5%), and L. monocytogenes and L. seeligeri (1% each). Listeria spp. contamination rates were higher in farm feed (70%), followed by litter (52.5%), chicken breasts (42.2%), and drinking water (10%). Almost all Listeria spp. isolates were resistant to more than three classes of antibiotics (multidrug resistant). Besides this, we observed a significant resistance level to penicillin and fluoroquinolone drugs. However, lower resistance levels were recorded for broad-spectrum cephalosporins. The inlA, inlC, and inlJ virulence genes were detected in almost all of the L. monocytogenes isolates. Thus, food safety management approaches and interventions at all stages of the broiler rearing cycle were needed to control cross-contamination and the zoonotic potential of listeriosis.

Keywords

Introduction

Egypt’s modern poultry industry began in 1964 with the establishment of the National General Poultry Company, which is government-owned, to provide Egypt’s fast growing human population with high-quality, affordable animal protein. In 1965, the Government encouraged the expansion of the rural small-scale family and private poultry sectors to fulfill the growing demand for poultry products. Unfortunately, the livestock population of Egypt has been plagued by lethal food-poisoning bacteria diseases, including listeriosis. However it is considered a rare form of food poisoning and one that is treatable. It is, nevertheless, a serious type of food poisoning that is particularly dangerous for pregnant women, the elderly, and anyone with poor immunity. According to the recent European Community Report, 1,763 confirmed human cases of listeriosis were recorded in the European Union (EU) in 2015, and the reported case fatality rate was 15.6% [13].

Listeria spp. are ubiquitous and have been isolated from poultry, animals, different types of foods, and environments worldwide [9]. Among the different species of the genus Listeria, Listeria monocytogenes is the causative agent of listeriosis [27]. Although poultry flocks are rarely reported as a vector of Listeria outbreaks, the relatively high prevalence of L. monocytogenes in chicken farms presents a potential risk. In Egypt, some studies have already investigated the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in chicken carcasses or fresh chicken meat [1,2]. However, scanty data are available on Listeria spp. prevalence, including L. monocytogenes, in chicken farm samples, especially environmental samples such as litter, drinking water, and poultry feed.

Owing to the severity and case fatality rate of listeriosis, treatment with antimicrobial agents is essential for the resolution of the infection. Therefore, the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the genus Listeria (especially, L. monocytogenes) may have public health consequences. This consideration led to an EU-wide ban on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed [6]. Moreover, an announcement of the US Food and Drug Administration from April 2012 suggests stopping application of antibiotics for growth promotion on a voluntary basis (www.fda.gov). In spite of all admitted bans, multidrug-resistant isolates of L. monocytogenes are still reported in poultry, animals, foods, and in human case samples. To the best of our knowledge, there are very few data on the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Listeria spp. from poultry farm environmental samples worldwide. Accordingly, in Egypt’s modern poultry industry, monitoring of multidrug-resistant Listeria spp. is crucial.

Hence, the objective of the present study was to generate baseline data for the contamination rate of the genus Listeria in broiler poultry farms; identify the Listeria spp. prevalence rate; determine the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns of isolated species; and detect virulence-associated genes of L. monocytogenes isolates.

 

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

The study was carried out in Sharkia Governorate, which has one of the major sources of animal protein, the poultry sector, in Egypt. Ten broiler poultry farms in Sharkia district were selected for investigation by a simple random sampling method. A total of 200 samples were collected, 20 samples/farm, during the summer of 2013. Samples for each comprised litter (n = 8), raw chicken meat carcass (n = 8), poultry feed (n = 2), and drinking water (n = 2). From each broiler farm, pooled samples of litter, feed, and water were taken. The litter sample was collected in a zigzag manner from different areas of the farm floor, then pooled to form one uniform sample, and packed separately in sterile plastic bags. Feed samples were obtained from feeders in front of the birds. Meanwhile, water samples were collected in 150-ml sterile glass bottles from drinkers. Chicken meat carcass samples were collected from raw chicken breasts. The region of the breast was favored because a new consumer report study found that about 97% of all chicken breasts contain harmful bacteria (http://www.allgov.com). A piece of approximately 30 g from the breast was obtained from each carcass. After that, all collected samples were immediately transported under cooled conditions to the laboratory and stored in the dark at 4℃ prior to analysis.

Detection of Listeria spp.

Detection of Listeria spp. was carried out using ISO11290-1 protocol [19]. Half Fraser broth and Half Fraser supplement (Oxoid, UK) were used as a primary selective enrichment medium. Briefly, 25 g of each sample was pre-enriched and then enriched by the secondary selective Fraser broth (containing Fraser broth base and Fraser supplement) for 24 h at 37℃. Finally, a loopful of enrichment broth culture was streaked onto Chromogenic Listeria agar (ISO) (CM1084; Oxoid) and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. Plates were examined for turquoise blue colonies with or without precipitation zones. The presumed colonies were purified on tryptone soya yeast glucose agar. The purified colonies were verified by biochemical tests and the Microbact Listeria 12L system (MB1128; Oxoid).

Phenotypic Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance in Listeria spp. Isolates

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done for all recovered isolates via standard disc diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid 337) using the Kirby-Bauer method [4]. The antimicrobials tested were ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), amoxicillin/flucloxacillin (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), and ofloxacin (5 μg). A ll a ntibiotic discs were provided by Oxoid. After incubating the inoculated plate, the susceptibility of the isolates to each antimicrobial agent was assigned according to break points recommended previously [10,21]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and E. coli ATCC 35218 were used as quality control strains [8].

Detection of Virulence Genes in L. monocytogenes Isolates

After confirming the L. monocytogenes isolates via biochemical identification kit, the isolates were identified for the presence of virulence markers (inlA, inlC, and inlJ) using multiplex PCR as described by Liu et al. [22]. The primers and PCR conditions are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.Primers and PCR conditions used for L. monocytogenes virulence gene detection.

 

Results and Discussion

Prevalence of Listeria spp. in Broiler Poultry Farm Samples

Although broiler poultry production has been one of the fastest growing industries in Egypt and people rely on poultry sectors as a primary animal protein source, there are limited reports documenting the prevalence and characterization of Listeria spp., including L. monocytogenes, in poultry farm environmental samples. Our results revealed that out of 200 tested samples, 95 (47.5%) were contaminated with Listeria spp., out of which 42, 37, 14, and 2 were isolated from broiler poultry farm litter, raw chicken meat carcass, farm feed, and farm drinking water, respectively (Table 2). The Listeria spp. isolates included L. monocytogenes (n = 2, 1%), L. innocua (n = 57, 28.5%), L. ivanovii (n = 25, 12.5%), L. welshimeri (n = 9 , 4.5%), and L. seeligeri (n = 2 , 1%). All recovered Listeria isolates were confirmed using the Microbact Listeria 12L system.

Table 2.N/A: None.

A higher prevalence of Listeria spp. indicates a significant public health hazard associated with litter, feeder, drinking systems, and/or the consumption of contaminated poultry or poultry products. The isolation rate of L. monocytogenes was in line with a few studies that have reported a low prevalence from 0 to 4.3% [11,24]. However, with other countries such as France [3,7] and Thailand [20], the rate was lower. A higher prevalence of 5.7% was observed in raw chicken meat in China [28]. Moreover, L. monocytogenes was isolated (based on PCR) from northern Spain at a prevalence of 26.5% [14] and 32% [7]. The differences in the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in poultry farm samples in different countries might be attributed to the sensitivity of bacteriological detection methods. The presence of L. monocytogenes in poultry farms even in low prevalence threatens public health and it may cause several diseases in children, pregnant women, the immune-compromised, and elderly.

L. innocua was the predominant Listeria spp. in our study. This finding is comparable to the results reported by other investigators [15,23]. L. innocua is important because it is closely related to L. monocytogenes and they are genetically similar. Despite that L. innocua is non-pathogenic in character, it was recognized as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance (ABR) for L. monocytogenes [5].

Although L. ivanovii is found almost exclusively in ruminants (mainly sheep), it was isolated from broiler poultry farm samples as it was the second predominant spp. (12.5%) in our study (Table 2). Early studies even document the link between ruminant listeriosis and contaminated poultry litter [12,25]. The contamination of broiler farm samples with L. ivanovii might be due to the nature of the litter material used that is mainly from pasture-raised animals (such as wood shavings, hay, or chopped rice straw), which provides the suitable environment for Listeria spp. cross-contamination [18]. Furthermore, broiler poultry farms in Egypt have very poor biosecurity practices, mainly because the farms are built very close to each other in cluster farm formation (large flock size), and poor rodent and vector controls and hazardous waste disposal, which may provide more chances for introduction of Listeria spp. or any other pathogen to the flocks. Therefore, more attention is required as L. ivanovii is an enteric opportunistic human pathogen.

Broiler Poultry Farm Sample Contamination Rate

Our findings demonstrated a high contamination rate of Listeria spp. in broiler feed (70%, 14/20), followed by broiler farm litter, raw chicken meat carcass, and broiler farm drinking water in which Listeria spp. prevalence was 52.5% (42/80), 46.2% (37/80), and 10% (2/20), respectively (Fig. 1). In Egyptian broiler poultry farms, feed is formed mainly from ingredients mixed on the farm by the farmer using a small mechanical simple crushing and mixing unit (vertical mixing). This trend is having many production problems and is related to poultry feed contamination. Besides this, part of this contamination could have also originated from bird feces that may have contaminated the manual hanging feeders and from litter contamination due to maladjusted feeders. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that the prevalence rates of Listeria spp. in broiler feed and litter samples were higher than other farm sample types. Among the analyzed categories, raw chicken meat carcass showed relatively higher level of contamination with Listeria spp., preceded by feed and farm litter samples, with a prevalence that reached 46.2% (Fig. 1). This could strengthen the fact that cross-contamination in broiler poultry farms must be considered in developing strategies by food safety and regulatory authorities to control Listeria spp. in broiler farms, and to avoid contamination of poultry meat and poultry products that are intended to be consumed.

Fig. 1.Contamination rate of Listeria spp. in different farm samples, Egypt.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 95 Listeria spp. isolates to eight antibiotics was investigated using the disc diffusion method (Table 3). The results indicate high levels of resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate (40%), followed by norfloxacin (38%), amoxicillin/flucloxacillin (35%), ofloxacin (32%), and ciprofloxacin (25%). However, lower resistance levels were recorded for ceftazidime (22%), followed by cefoxitin (15%) and ceftriaxone (14%). Despite the fact that isolates of L. monocytogenes, as well as strains of other Listeria spp., are susceptible to a wide range of antibiotics [17], almost all Listeria spp. isolates in this study were resistant to more than three classes of antibiotics (multidrug resistant). Unfortunately, it is obvious from our results that all L. monocytogenes isolates (100%) were resistant to penicillin group (amoxicillin/clavulanate and amoxicillin/flucloxacillin) drugs, and to our best knowledge, the treatment of choice for human listeriosis remains the administration of ampicillin or penicillin G. Acquisition of these trends of resistance would represent a major therapeutic problem in clinical settings, as it is now established that food-borne transmission constitutes the main route of acquisition of listeriosis [16]. The observed high rate of resistance to penicillin drugs might be ascribed to mis- or overuse of the drugs, as they are relatively cheaper and readily available to the local community.

Table 3.N/A: None.

The majority of Listeria isolates in our study were resistant to the tested fluoroquinolone group (norfloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin). Although The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified fluoroquinolone drugs as critically important in human medicine, fluoroquinolones are still introduced into the feed and water of industrially raised poultry in Egypt, primarily to make them grow faster rather than to treat disease.

In general, Listeria strains have been announced to be naturally susceptible and resistant to penicillins and modern cephalosporins, respectively [26]. Thus, it is surprising to note the contrary in our results (Table 3). It might be possible that alterations in the affinity of the cell walls (penicillin-binding protein 3) contribute to the differences in susceptibility to the broad-spectrum cephalosporins and penicillins. Future studies will be needed to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the observed antimicrobial resistance patterns among Listeria spp.

Virulence Genes in L. monocytogenes Isolates

As differentiation between virulent and non-virulent L. monocytogenes isolates is significant for evaluating the potential hazards of this microorganism for food safety and public health, L. monocytogenes isolates (n = 2) were tested for the presence/absence of virulence genes inlA, inlC, and inlJ. The inlA gene was observed in all of the L. monocytogenes isolates (100%). However, inlC and inlJ were detected in only one isolate (50% each). The differences in the levels of surface-associated internalins (A/C/J) may be correlated to L. monocytogenes serotype. Further characterization studies are needed to highlight this correlation. The presence of internalin genes in L. monocytogenes isolates suggests that these isolates could potentially cause human diseases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine L. monocytogenes isolates from environment samples of broiler poultry farms for the presence of surface-associated internalin genes.

In conclusion, a high contamination rate of Listeria spp. was demonstrated in broiler poultry farm samples in Egypt. The detection of L. ivanovii for the first time in poultry farms highlights the needs to control cross-contamination of farm feed and litter. Drug-resistant, including multidrug-resistant, Listeria spp. were found circulating among farm samples, posing high risk of infection for consumers. Moreover, an interesting aspect of the present study is the Listeria resistance patterns to penicillins and broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Finally, potentially pathogenic L. monocytogenes isolates from poultry farm environmental samples were recorded. Therefore, food safety management approaches and interventions at all stages of the broiler rearing cycle are needed to control the zoonotic potential of listeriosis.

References

  1. Ahmed AM, El-Atti NM. 2010. Existence of Listeria species in broiler carcasses with an attempt to control Listeria monocytogenes using trisodium phosphate. Afr. J. Food Sci. 4: 46-51.
  2. Ashraf MA, Sohaila F, Hassan A, Raafat H, Abdelazeem M, Khalid IE. 2010. Occurrence of Listeria species in meat, chicken products and human stools in Assiut city, Egypt with PCR use for rapid identification of Listeria monocytogenes. Veter. World 3: 353-359.
  3. Aury K, Bouquin SL, Toquin MT, Huneau-Salaun A, Le Notre Y, Allain V, et al. 2011. Risk factors for Listeria monocytogenes contamination in French laying hens and broiler flocks. Prev. Vet. Med. 98: 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.11.017
  4. Bauer A, Kirby W, Sherris JC, Turck M. 1996. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45: 493.
  5. Bertrand S, Huys G, Yde M, D’Haene K, Tardy F, Vrints M. 2005. Detection and characterization of tet(M) in tetracycline resistant Listeria strains from human and food processing origins in Belgium and France. J. Med. Microbiol. 54: 1151-1156. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46142-0
  6. Castanon JI. 2007. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult. Sci. 86: 2466-2471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00249
  7. Chemaly M, Toquin MT, Le Nôtre Y, Fravalo P. 2008. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in poultry production in France. J. Food Prot. 71: 1996-2000. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-71.10.1996
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (previously National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards). 2006. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Approved Standard-Ninth Edition M2-A9. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  9. Cocolin L, Stella S, Nappi R, Bozzetta E, Cantoni C, Comi G. 2005. Analysis of PCR-based methods for characterization of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from different sources. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 103: 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.027
  10. Conter M, Paludi D, Zanardi E, Ghidini S, Vergara A, Ianieri A. 2009. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance of foodborne Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 128: 497-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.10.018
  11. Cox NA, Bailey JS, Berrang ME. 1997. The presence of Listeria monocytogenes in the integrated poultry industry. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6: 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/6.1.116
  12. Dijkstra RG. 1976. Listeria-encephalitis in cows through litter from a broiler-farm. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Orig. B 161: 383-385.
  13. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). 2015. The European union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013. EFSA J. 13: 3991. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3991
  14. Esteban JI, Oporto B, Aduriz G, Juste RA, Hurtado A. 2008. A survey of food-borne pathogens in free-range poultry farms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 123: 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.012
  15. Fallah AA, Saei-Dehkordi SS, Rahnama M, Tahmasby H, Mahzounieh M. 2012. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Listeria species isolated from poultry products marketed in Iran. Food Control 28: 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.014
  16. Gomez D, Azon E, Marco N, Carraminana JJ, Rota C, Arino A, Yangüela J. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua from meat products and meat-processing environment. Food Microbiol. 42: 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.017
  17. Hof H, Nichterlein T, Kretschmar M. 1997. Management of listeriosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10: 345-357.
  18. Hosny FA. 2008. Poultry Sector Country Review. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations (FAO). November 2006, Re-edited July 2008; pp. 1-47.
  19. ISO11290-1. 1996. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes - Part 1: detection method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  20. Kanarat S, Jitnupong W, Sukhapesna J. 2011. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in chicken production chain in Thailand. Thai J. Vet. Med. 41: 155-161.
  21. Li Q, Sherwood J, Logue C. 2007. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria spp. recovered from processed bison. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 44: 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02027.x
  22. Liu D, Lawrence ML, Austin FW, Ainsworth AJ. 2007. A multiplex PCR for species- and virulence-specific determination of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Microbiol. Methods 71: 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.08.007
  23. Osaili TM, Alaboudi AR, Nesiar EA. 2011. Prevalence of Listeria spp. and antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from raw chicken and ready-to-eat chicken products in Jordan. Food Control 22: 586-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.008
  24. Petersen L, Madsen M. 2000. Listeria spp. in broiler flocks: recovery rates and species distribution investigated by conventional culture and the EiaFoss method. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 58: 113-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00258-0
  25. Skovgaard N, Morgen CA. 1988. Detection of Listeria spp. in faeces from animals, in feeds, and in raw foods of animal origin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 6: 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(88)90015-3
  26. Troxler R, von Graevenitz A, Funke G, Wiedemann B, Stock I. 2000. Natural antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria species: L. grayi, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri strains. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6: 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00168.x
  27. Vitas AI, Aguado V, Garcia-Jalon I. 2004. Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh and processed foods in Navarra (Spain). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 90: 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00314-3
  28. Zhang W, Wang X, Xia X, Yang B, Xi M, Meng J. 2013. Isolation and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from retail foods in Shaanxi Province, China. Foodborne Pathog. 10: 867-872. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1528

Cited by

  1. Listeria Occurrence in Poultry Flocks: Detection and Potential Implications vol.4, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00125
  2. The Distribution of Listeria in Pasture-Raised Broiler Farm Soils Is Potentially Related to University of Vermont Medium Enrichment Bias toward Listeria innocua over Listeria monocytogenes vol.4, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00227
  3. A Comprehensive Review of Common Bacterial, Parasitic and Viral Zoonoses at the Human-Animal Interface in Egypt vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens6030033
  4. Comparison between Listeria sensu stricto and Listeria sensu lato strains identifies novel determinants involved in infection vol.7, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17570-0
  5. 증균배지에서의 Listeria Interspecies의 경쟁생육 비교 vol.33, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13103/jfhs.2018.33.1.65
  6. Contribution of the Broiler Breeders’ Fecal Microbiota to the Establishment of the Eggshell Microbiota vol.11, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00666
  7. Analysis of Benzalkonium Chloride Resistance and Potential Virulence of Listeria monocytogenes Isolates Obtained from Different Stages of a Poultry Production Chain in Spain vol.83, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-19-289
  8. Occurrence and Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meat Products in Poland vol.83, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4315/jfp-19-525
  9. Application of Whole Genome Sequencing to Aid in Deciphering the Persistence Potential of Listeria monocytogenes in Food Production Environments vol.9, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091856
  10. The prevalence of Listeria species in different food items of animal and plant origin in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.26, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00532-8