DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pocket-Sized Echocardiography Devices: One Stop Shop Service?

  • Received : 2015.12.20
  • Accepted : 2016.02.01
  • Published : 2016.03.27

Abstract

The introduction of portable, pocket-sized echocardiography devices in various healthcare systems has raised new questions with regards to their realistic use in clinical practice. Several studies have already attempted to provide information regarding their safety and diagnostic potential, the training required to operate them, as well as their direct comparison with standard echocardiography machines. This manuscript is a review of the literature of the documents or position papers which employ the use of pocket or handheld devices. Following review of the literature, we suggest that these miniaturized devices can provide a valuable diagnostic tool that can complement and improve the diagnostic yield of clinical examination. When operated by appropriately trained professionals, they can provide a limited but very reliable echocardiographic assessment. Pocket-sized echocardiography is a part of physical examination and should not be considered a complete echocardiographic scan. Optimal training is required for the smooth operation of handheld echocardiography.

Keywords

References

  1. Kimura BJ, DeMaria AN. Technology insight: hand-carried ultrasound cardiac assessment--evolution, not revolution. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:217-23; quiz 224. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0154
  2. Seward JB, Douglas PS, Erbel R, Kerber RE, Kronzon I, Rakowski H, Sahn LD, Sisk EJ, Tajik AJ, Wann S. Hand-carried cardiac ultrasound (HCU) device: recommendations regarding new technology. A report from the Echocardiography Task Force on New Technology of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:369-73. https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.123026
  3. Sicari R, Galderisi M, Voigt JU, Habib G, Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Badano LP. The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:85-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq184
  4. Ligtvoet C, Rijsterborgh H, Kappen L, Bom N. Real time ultrasonic imaging with a hand-held scanner. Part I--technical description. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978;4:91-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(78)90033-9
  5. Roelandt J, Wladimiroff JW, Baars AM. Ultrasonic real time imaging with a hand-held-scanner. Part II--initial clinical experience. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978;4:93-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(78)90034-0
  6. Tavel ME. Cardiac auscultation: a glorious past--and it does have a future! Circulation 2006;113:1255-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591149
  7. Oddone EZ, Waugh RA, Samsa G, Corey R, Feussner JR. Teaching cardiovascular examination skills: results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 1993;95:389-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90308-C
  8. Spencer KT, Anderson AS, Bhargava A, Bales AC, Sorrentino M, Furlong K, Lang RM. Physician-performed point-of-care echocardiography using a laptop platform compared with physical examination in the cardiovascular patient. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2013-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01288-8
  9. Fedson S, Neithardt G, Thomas P, Lickerman A, Radzienda M, De-Cara JM, Lang RM, Spencer KT. Unsuspected clinically important findings detected with a small portable ultrasound device in patients admitted to a general medicine service. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:901-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00426-7
  10. Galderisi M, Santoro A, Versiero M, Lomoriello VS, Esposito R, Raia R, Farina F, Schiattarella PL, Bonito M, Olibet M, de Simone G. Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010;8:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-8-51
  11. Panoulas VF, Daigeler AL, Malaweera AS, Lota AS, Baskaran D, Rahman S, Nihoyannopoulos P. Pocket-size hand-held cardiac ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical examination in the hands of medical students and junior doctors. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:323-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes140
  12. Cardim N, Fernandez Golfin C, Ferreira D, Aubele A, Toste J, Cobos MA, Carmelo V, Nunes I, Oliveira AG, Zamorano J. Usefulness of a new miniaturized echocardiographic system in outpatient cardiology consultations as an extension of physical examination. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.09.017
  13. Martin LD, Howell EE, Ziegelstein RC, Martire C, Whiting-O'Keefe QE, Shapiro EP, Hellmann DB. Hand-carried ultrasound performed by hospitalists: does it improve the cardiac physical examination? Am J Med 2009;122:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.07.022
  14. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, Ronan A, Shah D, Vasaiwala S, Brooks E, Levy A, Kirkpatrick JN, Spencer KT. A comparison by medicine residents of physical examination versus hand-carried ultrasound for estimation of right atrial pressure. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1614-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.037
  15. Kobal SL, Trento L, Baharami S, Tolstrup K, Naqvi TZ, Cercek B, Neuman Y, Mirocha J, Kar S, Forrester JS, Siegel RJ. Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1002-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.060
  16. Decara JM, Kirkpatrick JN, Spencer KT, Ward RP, Kasza K, Furlong K, Lang RM. Use of hand-carried ultrasound devices to augment the accuracy of medical student bedside cardiac diagnoses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:257-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2004.11.015
  17. Mjolstad OC, Dalen H, Graven T, Kleinau JO, Salvesen O, Haugen BO. Routinely adding ultrasound examinations by pocket-sized ultrasound devices improves inpatient diagnostics in a medical department. Eur J Intern Med 2012;23:185-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2011.10.009
  18. Liebo MJ, Israel RL, Lillie EO, Smith MR, Rubenson DS, Topol EJ. Is pocket mobile echocardiography the next-generation stethoscope? A cross-sectional comparison of rapidly acquired images with standard transthoracic echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:33-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00005
  19. Andersen GN, Haugen BO, Graven T, Salvesen O, Mjolstad OC, Dalen H. Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:665-70.
  20. Fukuda S, Shimada K, Kawasaki T, Fujimoto H, Maeda K, Inanami H, Yoshida K, Jissho S, Taguchi H, Yoshiyama M, Yoshikawa J. Pocket-sized transthoracic echocardiography device for the measurement of cardiac chamber size and function. Circ J 2009;73:1092-6. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-1076
  21. Culp BC, Mock JD, Chiles CD, Culp WC Jr. The pocket echocardiograph: validation and feasibility. Echocardiography 2010;27:759-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.01125.x
  22. Filipiak-Strzecka D, John B, Kasprzak JD, Michalski B, Lipiec P. Pocket-size echocardiograph--a valuable tool for nonexperts or just a portable device for echocardiographers? Adv Med Sci 2013;58:67-72. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10039-012-0054-2
  23. Prinz C, Voigt JU. Diagnostic accuracy of a hand-held ultrasound scanner in routine patients referred for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:111-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.017
  24. Kitada R, Fukuda S, Watanabe H, Oe H, Abe Y, Yoshiyama M, Song JM, Sitges M, Shiota T, Ito H, Yoshikawa J. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a pocket-sized transthoracic echocardiographic imaging device. Clin Cardiol 2013;36:603-10.
  25. Kono Y, Fukuda S, Shimada K, Oe H, Maeda K, Kawasaki T, Fujimoto H, Otsuka K, Kubo T, Jissho S, Taguchi H, Yoshiyama M, Ito H, Yoshikawa J. Pocket-sized echo for evaluation of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:921.
  26. Prinz C, Dohrmann J, van Buuren F, Bitter T, Bogunovic N, Horstkotte D, Faber L. The importance of training in echocardiography: a validation study using pocket echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2012;13:700-7. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a55f

Cited by

  1. Echokardiographie : Wichtiges diagnostisches Standbein in der Kardiologie vol.42, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4557-2
  2. Group A Streptococcus, Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Epidemiology and Clinical Considerations vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0513-y
  3. Point-of-care B-type natriuretic peptide and portable echocardiography for assessment of patients with suspected heart failure in primary care: rationale and design of the three-part Handheld-BNP prog vol.107, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1181-3
  4. Can Diaphragm Dysfunction Be Reliably Evaluated with Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in Intensive Care Unit? vol.2018, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5192647
  5. Deployed military general internal physician’s toolkit: the recent past and near future vol.164, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2017-000846
  6. A systematic review of pocket-sized imaging devices: small and mighty? vol.5, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1530/erp-18-0030
  7. A Review of Echocardiography Training for Internal Medicine Residents: Proposed Goals, Methods, and Metrics vol.11, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-018-9468-y
  8. Global prevalence of congenital heart disease in school-age children: a meta-analysis and systematic review vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01781-x
  9. Prognostic value of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest: a systematic review vol.18, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-0185-8
  10. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular venipuncture using pocket-sized versus standard ultrasound devices: a prospective non-inferiority trial vol.48, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01118-x