DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sphenoid bone changes in rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

  • Stepanko, Lucas S. (Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta) ;
  • Lagravere, Manuel O. (Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta)
  • Received : 2015.10.07
  • Accepted : 2016.01.27
  • Published : 2016.09.25

Abstract

Objective: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is used to expand the maxilla and increase arch perimeter; yet, there are few reports on its effects on the sphenoid bone. With cone-beam computed topography (CBCT), it is possible to visualize sphenoid bone changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate sphenoid bone changes observed in conjunction with RME treatments, using CBCT. Methods: Sixty patients (34 women and 26 men, aged 11-17 years) underwent RME as part of their orthodontic treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a tooth-anchored group, a bone-anchored group, or a control group. Initial CBCT scans were performed preceding the RME treatment ($T_1$) and again directly after the completion of expansion ($T_2$). Statistical analysis included ANOVA, descriptive statistics, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The reliability of the landmark location was at least 0.783, and the largest ICC mean measurement error was 2.32 mm. With regard to distances, the largest change was 0.78 mm, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Statistical significance was established in patient groups of the same sex and treatment type for the following distance measurements: right anterior lateral pterygoid plate to the right edge of the hypophyseal fossa ($d_2$), anterior distance between the medial pterygoid plates ($d_4$), and anterior distance between the left medial and lateral plates ($d_8$). Conclusions: In this study, there were no clinically significant changes in the sphenoid bone due to RME treatments regardless of sex or treatment type.

Keywords

References

  1. Angell EH. Treatment of irregularity of the permanent or adult teeth. Dent Cosmos 1860;1:199-600.
  2. Ghoneima A, Abdel-Fattah E, Hartsfield J, El-Bedwehi A, Kamel A, Kula K. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:510-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.024
  3. Lagravere MO, Gamble J, Major PW, Heo G. Transverse dental changes after tooth-borne and bone-borne maxillary expansion. Int Orthod 2013;11:21-34.
  4. Lione R, Ballanti F, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Cozza P. Treatment and posttreatment skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion studied with low-dose computed tomography in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:389-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.011
  5. Timms DJ, Preston CB, Daly PF. A computed tomographic assessment of maxillary movement induced by rapid expansion - a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:123-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/4.2.123
  6. Merrett SJ, Drage NA, Durning P. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Orthod 2009;36:202-10. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120723193
  7. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazao DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26-35. https://doi.org/10.2319/032210-166.1
  8. Leonardi R, Cutrera A, Barbato E. Rapid maxillary expansion affects the spheno-occipital synchondrosis in youngsters. A study with low-dose computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2010;80:106-10. https://doi.org/10.2319/012709-56.1
  9. Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Kim H, Nilsson P, Marcusson A. Three-dimensional assessment of transverse skeletal changes after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment: a prospective computerized tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:825-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.015
  10. Gunyuz Toklu M, Germec-Cakan D, Tozlu M. Periodontal, dentoalveolar, and skeletal effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne expansion appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.022
  11. Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:263-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq144
  12. Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 2015;85:253-62. https://doi.org/10.2319/030514-156.1
  13. Nada RM, van Loon B, Schols JG, Maal TJ, de Koning MJ, Mostafa YA, et al. Volumetric changes of the nose and nasal airway 2 years after tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Oral Sci 2013;121:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12068
  14. Vinha PP, Faria AC, Xavier SP, Christino M, de Mello-Filho FV. Enlargement of the Pharynx resulting from surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:369-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.157
  15. Lima SM Jr, de Moraes M, Asprino L. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with and without separation of the pterygomaxillary suture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1771-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.035
  16. Seeberger R, Kater W, Davids R, Thiele OC. Long term effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without performing osteotomy of the pterygoid plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:175-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.07.003
  17. Lee SC, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim KB, Araujo EA, Kook YA. Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:638-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.029
  18. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90202-2

Cited by

  1. Three-dimensional assessment of the middle cranial fossa and central skull base following Herbst appliance treatment vol.88, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2319/101517-694.1