DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mathematical explanation on the POD applications for wind pressure fields with or without mean value components

  • Zhang, Jun-Feng (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Ge, Yao-Jun (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Zhao, Lin (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Chen, Huai (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University)
  • Received : 2015.10.22
  • Accepted : 2016.08.21
  • Published : 2016.10.25

Abstract

The influence mechanism of mean value components, noted as $P_0$, on POD applications for complete random fields $P_C(t)$ and fluctuating random fields $P_F(t)$ are illustrated mathematically. The critical philosophy of the illustration is introduction of a new matrix, defined as the correlation function matrix of $P_0$, which connect the correlation function matrix of $P_C(t)$ and $P_F(t)$, and their POD results. Then, POD analyses for several different wind pressure fields were presented comparatively as validation. It's inevitable mathematically that the first eigenmode of $P_C(t)$ resembles the distribution of $P_0$ and the first eigenvalue of $P_C(t)$ is close to the energy of $P_0$, due to similarity of the correlation function matrixs of $P_C(t)$ and $P_0$. However, the viewpoint is not rigorous mathematically that the first mode represents the mean pressure and the following modes represent the fluctuating pressure when $P_C(t)$ are employed in POD application. When $P_C(t)$ are employed, POD results of all modes would be distorted by the mean value components, and it's impossible to identify $P_0$ and $P_F(t)$ separately. Consequently, characteristics of the fluctuating component, which is always the primary concern in wind pressure field analysis, can only be precisely identified with $P_0$ excluded in POD.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Baker, C.J. (2000), "Aspects of the use of proper orthogonal decomposition of surface pressure fields", Wind Struct., 3(2), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2000.3.2.097
  2. Bienkiewicz, B., Ham, H.J. and Sun, Y. (1993), "Proper orthogonal decomposition of roof pressure", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 50(1-3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90074-X
  3. Bienkiewicz, B., Tamura, Y., Ham, H.J., Ueda, H. and Hibi, K. (1995), "Proper orthogonal decomposition and reconstruction of multi-channel roof pressure", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 54-55, 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00066-M
  4. Carassale, L., Solari, G. and Tubino, F. (2007), "Proper orthogonal decomposition in wind engineering. Part 2: Theoretical aspects and some applications", Wind Struct., 10(2), 177-208. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.2.177
  5. Chatterjee, A. (2000), "An introduction to proper orthogonal decomposition", Current Sci., 78(7), 808-817.
  6. Chen, M.Y., Zhang, J.S. and Zhou, G.G. (2011), "Application of proper orthogonal decomposition technique in wind engineering of structures", Adv. Mater. Res., 250-253, 2678-2681. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.2678
  7. Chen, Y., Kopp, G.A. and Surry, D. (2004), "Spatial extrapolation of pressure time series on low buildings using proper orthogonal decomposition", Wind Struct., 7(6), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.6.373
  8. Cheng, L., Lam, K.M. and Wong, S.Y. (2015), "POD analysis of crosswind forces on a tall building with square and H-shaped cross sections", Wind Struct., 21(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2015.21.1.063
  9. Davenport, A.G. (1995), "How can we simplify and generalize wind loads?", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 54-55, 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00079-S
  10. Fiore, A. and Monaco, P. (2009), "POD-based representation of the alongwind equivalent static force for long-span bridges", Wind Struct., 12(3), 239-257. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.3.239
  11. Hoa, L.T. (2009), "Proper orthogonal decomposition and recent advanced topics in wind engineering", VNU J. Science, Mathematics - Physics, 25(1), 21-38.
  12. Holmes, J.D. (1990), "Analysis and synthesis of pressure fluctuations on bluff bodies using eigenvectors", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 33(1-2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90037-D
  13. Holmes, J.D., Sankaran, R., Kwok, K.C.S. and Syme, M.J. (1997), "Eigenvector modes of fluctuating pressures on low-rise building models", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 69-71, 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00198-0
  14. Jeong, S.H., Bienkiewicz B. and Ham, H.J. (2000), "Proper orthogonal decomposition of building wind pressure specified at non-uniformly distributed pressure taps", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 87(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00012-X
  15. Kareem, A. and Cermak, J.E. (1984), "Pressure fluctuations on a square building model in boundary-layer flows", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 16(1), 1753-1763.
  16. Kikuchi, H., Tamura, Y., Ueda, H. and Hibi, K. (1997), "Dynamic wind pressures acting on a tall building model - proper orthogonal decomposition", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 69-71, 631-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00193-1
  17. Letchford, C.W. and Mehta, K.C. (1993), "The distribution and correlation of fluctuating pressures on the Texas Tech Building", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 50(1-3), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90077-2
  18. Li, F.H., Gu, M., Ni, Z.H. and Shen S.Z. (2012), "Wind pressures on structures by proper orthogonal decomposition", J. Civil Eng. Architecture, 6(2), 238-243.
  19. Liang, Y.C., Lee, H.P., Lim, S.P., Lin, W.Z., Lee, K.H. and Wu, C.G. (2002), "Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications-Part I: Theory", J. Sound Vib., 252(3), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4041
  20. Loeve, M. (1978), Probability Theory II (4th Edn.), New York, Springer-Verlag.
  21. Lumley, J.L. (1970), Stochastic Tools in Turbulence, New York, Academic Press.
  22. Ricciardelli, F., de Grenet, E.T. and Solari G. (2002), "Analysis of the wind loading of a bridge deck box section using proper orthogonal decomposition", Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res., 29(3-4), 312-322.
  23. Solari, G. and Tubino, F. (2002), "A turbulence model based on principal components", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 17(4), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00016-4
  24. Solari, G., Carassale, L. and Tubino, F. (2007), "Proper orthogonal decomposition in wind engineering. Part 1: A state-of-the-art and some prospects", Wind Struct., 10(2), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.2.153
  25. Tamura, Y., Suganuma, S., Kikuchi, H. and Hibi, K. (1999), "Proper orthogonal decomposition of random wind pressure field", J. Fluid. Struct., 13(7-8), 1069-1095. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0242
  26. Tamura, Y., Ueda, H., Kikuchi, H., Hibi, K., Suganuma, S. and Bienkiewicz, B. (1997), "Proper orthogonal decomposition study of approach wind-building pressure correlation", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 72(1-3): 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00270-5
  27. Taylor, J.A. and Glauser, M.N. (2004), "Towards practical flow sensing and control via POD and LSE based low-dimensional tools", J. Fluids Eng. T. - ASME, 126(3), 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1760540
  28. Tubino, F. and Solari, G. (2007), "Gust buffeting of long span bridges: Double Modal Transformation and effective turbulence", Eng. Struct., 29(8), 1689-1707.
  29. Uematsu, Y., Kuribara, O., Yamada, M., Sasaki, A. and Hongo, T. (2001), "Wind-induced dynamic behavior and its load estimation of a single-layer latticed dome with a long span", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 89(14-15), 1671-1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00125-8
  30. Wang, L., Wang, Y., Li, Z.Q. and Zhang, Y. (2010), "Estimation of the vortex shedding frequency of a 2-D building using correlation and the POD methods", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98(12), 895-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.08.006

Cited by

  1. Statistical and modal analysis of surface pressure fluctuations in tornado-like vortices vol.32, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0012446
  2. Effect of aerodynamic modifications on the surface pressure patterns of buildings using proper orthogonal decomposition vol.32, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2021.32.3.227