정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.421-432
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미국 영국 독일 컴퓨터 교육과정에서 한국 컴퓨터 교육의 시사점

An Implications of Computer Education in Korea from the U.S., U.K. and Germany Computer Curriculums

  • 김갑수 (서울교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Kim, Kapsu (Dept. of Computer Education, Seoul National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.22
  • 심사 : 2016.08.30
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

21세기 지식정보 사회에서 미래 세대에 대한 컴퓨터 교육은 매우 중요하다. 따라서 선진국인 미국, 영국, 독일은 컴퓨터 교육을 어떻게 하고 있는지 알아보는 것은 매우 중요하다. 미국의 경우에는 NETS 교육과정과 ACM 교육과정을 알아보고, 영국의 국가 수준의 컴퓨터 교육과정을 알아보고 또한 독일에서 국가수준의 컴퓨터 교육과정을 알아본다. 미국, 영국, 독일의 교육과정에서는 컴퓨터 과학, 정보 기술, 디지털 리터러시가 포함되어 있고, 컴퓨터 교과가 독립적으로 되어 있고, 최소한의 시수를 초등학교에서는 17시간 이상 한다는 것을 알 수 있다. 2015년 개정된 우리나라 초등학교 컴퓨터 교육과정은 독립교과로 운영되지 않기 때문에 정체성이 없고. 내용으로는 소프트웨어 교육만 포함되어 있고, 시간수도 17시간이라는 제한이 매우 문제이다.

The 21st century computer education is very important for the future generations in the knowledge and information society. Therefore, developed countries that are the US, UK, and Germany, it is very important to find out how the computer education. In the US, the NETS and ACM K12 curriculum are investigated, In the UK and Germany national level computer curriculums are looked out. USA, UK, and Germany's curriculum includes computer science, information technology, digital literacy, and computer curriculum is independent, at least in the elementary schools computer education can be seen that more than 17 hours. After the revised national curriculum at 2015 is amended in korea. compared to the developed countries to derive the problems of the Korean revised national curriculum 2015. The revised 2015 Korean elementary school computer education, has no identity because it is not operated as an independent subject. Software will include education only. A very limited time of 17 hours may be a problem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barr, V. & Stephenson, S. (2011, March). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science community? ACM Inroads, (2)1, 48-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
  2. Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., & Kazakoff, E. R. (2014, March). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers and Education, 72, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
  3. CAS (2013A). Computing in the national curriculum:A guide for primary teachers. Computing At School.
  4. CAS (2013B). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for secondary teachers. Computing At School Computing At School.
  5. Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Daniel Moix,Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Dianne O'Grady-Cuniff, Chris Stephenson, Anita Verno (2011). CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards Revised 2011.
  6. Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Daniel Moix,Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Dianne O' Grady-Cuniff, Chris Stephenson, Anita Verno (2016). CSTA K-12 COMPUTER SCIENCE STANDARDS REVISED 2016 CSTA STANDARDS TASK FORCE.
  7. German Informatics Society (GI) (2008). Grundsatze und Standards fur die Informatik in der Schule. Bildungsstandards Informatik fur die Sekundarstufe I (2008) (in German).
  8. Grover, S. & Pea, R. (2013, January/February). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
  9. Hong, M. H. (2014). A Study on ICT Competences of Turkey and Korea Focus on PISA 2009 and PISA 2012. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.151
  10. Kim Kapsu, etc (2014). A Study on Contents of Information Science Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.161
  11. Kim, Kapsu (2015). A Study on ICT Competences of Korean Students Focus on PISA 2009 and 2012. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.233
  12. Kim, Kapsu (2010). A Study on Programming Language Instruction Strategies of Improving the creative and logical thinking for Elementary Students. JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 8(2), 63-70.
  13. Kim, Kapsu (2016). A Recognition Analysis of Elementary Teachers for Software Education of 2015 Revised Korea Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.1.47
  14. ISTE standards (2016). Redefining learning in a technology-driven world A report to support adoption of the ISTE Standards for Students June 2016.
  15. Lye, S. Z., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014, December). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  16. Ministry of Education (2015). The revised national curriculum 2015 for Primary and Secondary Schools, Vol.2015-75, No. 10.
  17. Ministry of Education (2000). Information and Communication Technology Education Guidelines.
  18. Ministry of Education (2005). Information and Communication Technology Education Guidelines.
  19. OECD (2013). PISA2012 Results. www.oecd.org/pisa.
  20. Tucker, A., Deek, F., Jones, J., McCowan, D., Stephenson, C., and Verno, A. (2002). A model curriculum for K-12 computer science, Report of the ACM K-12 Education Task Force Computer Science Curriculum Committee.
  21. Twining, P., Raffaghelli, J., Albion, P., & Knezek, D. (2013, August 5). Moving education into the digital age: the contribution of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 426-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12031
  22. Wing, J. M. (2008, July 31). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118