Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Problem Solving Analysis of Gifted Students in Information based on PISA Problem Solving Tool

PISA의 문제해결력 도구를 이용한 정보 영재 학생의 문제해결력 분석

  • Received : 2016.04.08
  • Accepted : 2016.04.17
  • Published : 2016.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to analyze how is the gifted in Informatics student's cognitive features different from others and present standard for screening. So ultimately, I hope this study contribute to the promising perspective and curriculum development for gifted elementary school students in information science. And hopefully give an Implications for the way forward as an information special education by study of problem solving skills that underlie the learning ability. These skills are being able to collect, analyze, synthesize and apply the informations so that make sustainable development possible. Therefor, the ultimate goal of this study is to provide better education for the gifted in Informatics student's basic learning skills.

본 연구의 목적은 정보영재학생들의 인지적인 특징을 비교하고 그를 통해 정보영재학생들의 판별과 관찰기준을 제시하며 나아가 적합한 교육과정을 개발하는 데 도움이 되고자 하는 데 있다. 이에 영재학생들의 지속적인 발전과 개발을 위한 기초정신능력이자, 다양한 정보를 수집하고 분석하며 종합하고 적용하는 등 학습능력의 바탕이 되는 '문제해결력'에 대한 연구를 통하여 앞으로 정보 분야의 영재교육이 나아가야 할 방향에 대해 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 "2012 PISA 컴퓨터 기반 문제해결력 평가틀을 검사도구로 사용하여 정보영재 학생들에게 특징적으로 나타나는 우수한 측면과 보완이 요구되는 특성을 분석함으로써 정보영재학생들을 위한 교육과정이 지향해야 할 목표에 대한 방향을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, youngseon, Lee, soonyoung, and Kim, kapsu (2005). Analysis of non-intellectual Characteristics of the Gifted Elementary School in Computers. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 9(3), 377-386.
  2. Han, misook, and Lee, youngjun (2012). Design of Algorithm Education Contents for the Informatics Gifted Secondary Students. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(1), 192-195.
  3. Jin, younghun, and Son, jeongwoo (2011). Effects of Gifted Students' Creative Problem Solving Ability by Team-Based Learning. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 21(3), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.3.703
  4. Jun, woochun (2013). A Study on Correlation Anaysis of Academic Performance Per Subject for the Gifted Children in IT. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(3), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.3.407
  5. Marland, S. P. Jr. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented-Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education.
  6. OECD (2011). PISA 2012 Field Trial Problem Solving Framework. (Vol. I). Paris: OECD.
  7. OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving. (Vol. V). Paris: OECD.
  8. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  9. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model : A Guide for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted and Talented, Wethersfield, CT : Creative Learning Press.
  10. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Can heuristics be taught?, In J. Lochhead & J. Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction, 315-338. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
  11. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic.
  12. Seo, youngmin, and Lee, youngjun (2010). A Subject Integration Robot Programming Instruction Model to Enhance the Creativity of Information Gifted Students. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 13(1), 19-26.
  13. Terman, L .M. and M. H. Oden (1947). The gifted child grows up. Vol4. Genetic studies of genius. Stanford University Press.
  14. Toffler, A. (1989). The Third Wave, Bantam Books.
  15. Woolfolk, A. E. (1995). Educational Psychology, (6th ed), London, Allyn and Bacon.