Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Annual Heating Energy Demands of Standard Models for Light-Weight Wood Frame Houses in Korea - Focusing on the Standard Rural House and the Low-Energy Standard House -

국내 목조주택 표준모델의 난방에너지성능 분석 - 농어촌 표준주택과 저에너지 표준주택을 대상으로 -

  • Received : 2016.04.08
  • Accepted : 2016.08.18
  • Published : 2016.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Over the past decade, the demand for wood frame house has been consistently increased due to their environmental performance and comfortable indoor air quality. In this study, the annual heating energy demands of standard models for light-weight wood frame houses were analyzed to confirm the energy performance of supplied wood frame houses in Korea. The standard rural house and low-energy standard house were compared. As a result, the annual heating energy demands were most influenced by the difference of configuration of exterior envelope. The simulation results showed that annual heating energy demands of standard rural house were $103.9kWh/m^2a$ (A-type), $111.7kWh/m^2a$ (B-type) and the value of low-energy standard house was $48.3kWh/m^2a$. The most significant heat loss of standard rural house was transmission heat loss of windows even it has area of $11.44m^2$. In addition, the annual heating demands were changed according to local weather data and air-tightness performance.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통부

References

  1. Ahn, N., Cho, M., & Choi, J.(2013). A study on the airtightness performance analysis of low-energy house in korea, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 33(1), 334-338.
  2. Chang, K. (2003). Environment-friendly Wood House, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 47(5), 33-36.
  3. Shin, U., Yoon, J., & Baek, N. (2005). Experimental Study on Airtightness Performance of the House with High Levels of Insulation and Airtight Construction, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 25(4), 61-67.
  4. Yu, S., Kim, S., Seo, J., & Kim, S. (2013). Analysis of Energy Efficiency of Light-Weigh Wood Frame House and Wooden Passive House Using PHPP, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 29(8), 199-207.
  5. Park, S. (2012). Passive House Design Using PHPP, Journal of KIAEBS, 6(3), 39-47.
  6. Cha, J., Kim, S., Jeong S., Kim, S., & Choi, J. (2013). Consideration for Passive House Design standards, Journal of KIAEBS, 7(1), 38-47.
  7. Chun, S. (2013). Current Policy Status and Prospects of t he Korean Government for Building Energy, Air-Condition ing and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea, 42(2), 18-25.
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2015). Statistical Year Book of Molit, 491-503.
  9. Kwon, O., Kim, J., Kim, M., Seok, Y., & Jeong, J. (2010). Case Study of Residential Building Air Tightness in Korea based on Blower Door Test Approach, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 26(7), 303-310.
  10. Deutsche Industric Normen. (2008). DIN EN ISO 6946:2008-04. Retrieved December. 15, 2015 from https://www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-en-iso-6946/100557483
  11. Argeunon gwichon's Center. (2014). Rural Standard House. Retrieved December. 10, 2015 from http://www.returnfarm.com/rtf/m4/n42/farmHouse/farmHouseList.do
  12. Ministry of Land. (2015). Statistics on Building Permissi on and Commencement Works. Retrieved January. 25, 2016 from http://stat.molit.go.kr
  13. Passive House Institute Korea. (2015). Low-energy Stand ard House. Retrived December. 10, 2015 from http://phiko.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=z11_01