대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제32권8호
  • /
  • Pages.103-111
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건축의 원리로서 연속성의 형태에 관한 이론적 고찰 - 실내와 시내 사이 그리고 과거와 미래 사이 연속성을 중심으로 -

A Theoretical Study on the Form of Continuity as an Architectural Principle - Focused on the continuity between architectural space and urban space and between yesterday and tomorrow -

  • Kim, Myungshig (Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.27
  • 심사 : 2016.07.25
  • 발행 : 2016.08.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Architectural space and urban space can be integrated as a single concept of continuity. The two different and heterogeneous realities of spaces communicate with each other in a way that architecture connects both. The building form is articulated by the rapports and the resonance between them to provide human being with a private and public life-world. It is also articulated between the past, the present, and the future because it gains a figure as a revelation about the form of space and simultaneously the shape of time. It consists in a twofold form that discloses a physical connection between inside and outside, and a nonphysical connection between yesterday and tomorrow. There exists the spatial and temporal continuity as one of architectural principles. The paper theoretically explores, through literature review, the form of continuity between spaces, and times in order to establish its basis. The first site investigates the continuum of space that architecture makes its interior to connect with exterior. The second site gives an account of the continuity of the matter-forms and the continuum of the spatial forms in a way which architecture is understood by the sequential perception and experience. The third site deals with the significant nonphysical continuity in the shape of time, for architecture exposes the continued form imprinted by the course of history or its discontinuity. The paper clarifies the physical, spatial form of continuity between architectural space and urban space, the cognition on the form and space by the continued perception and experience, and the nonphysical, temporal continuity inherent in architecture. It comes to the conclusion that the form of continuity (both nonphysical and physical) ought to be considered as a significant design principle in the professional field of architecture. Ultimately, the paper aims at establishing and offering a theoretical basis on the form of continuity as a architectural principle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arnheim, R. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 162-3, 176, 204.
  2. Arnheim, R. (1992). To the Rescue of Art: Twenty-Six Essays. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 95, 98.
  3. Bacon, E. (1967). Design of Cities. London, Thames and Hudson, 103.
  4. Broadbent, G. (2005). Emerging Concepts in Urban Space Design. New York, Taylor & Francis, 47.
  5. De Carli, C. (1967). "Contro la realta finta." Interni, 1, 3.
  6. Fiedler, C., Goller, A., Hildebrand, A., Schmarsow, A., Vischer, R., & Wolfflin, H. (1994). Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873-1893. Santa Monica, The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities, 142.
  7. Focillon, H. (1992). The Life of Forms in Art. (La vie des forms, 1934). New York, Zone Books, 105.
  8. Giedion, S. (1982). Space, Time and Architecture. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 69-70.
  9. Healy, P. (2003). Beauty and The Sublime. Amsterdam, Sun, 76-79, 132-3, 135-6.
  10. Heckscher, A. (1962). The Public Happiness. New York, Atheneum Publishers, 102.
  11. Heidegger, M. (1969). Die Kunst und der Raum. Erker Verlag, St. Gallen, 10.
  12. Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, Language, Thought. (originally published in 1971), New York, Perennial Classics, 74.
  13. Holl, S. (2009). Urbanisms: Working with Doubt. New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 37.
  14. Kahn, L. (1971). "The Room, the Street and Human Agreement." AIA Journal, 56(3), 33-34.
  15. Kubler, G. (2008). The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things. (first published in 1962). New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 3-11, 56, 116.
  16. Le Corbusier. (1986). Toward a New Architecture. New York, Dover Publications, 48, 177.
  17. Le Corbusier. (1991). Precisions on the Present State of Architecture and City Planning: With an American Prologue, a Brazilian Corollary Followed by the Temperature of Paris and the Atmosphere of Moscow. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 77.
  18. Ockman, J. (1993). Architecture Culture 1943-1968. New York, Rizzoli, 201, 203.
  19. Rogers, E. N. (1955). "Le preesistenze ambientali e itemi pratici contemporanei." Casabella-Continuita, 204, 3, 5.
  20. Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. (first published in 1966). London, Architectural Press, 71, 84-5, 89.
  21. Vitale, S. (1928). L'estetica dell'architettura: saggio sullo sviluppo dello spirit construttivo. Bari, Laterza, 61.
  22. Zevi, B. (1957). Architecture as Space: How to Look at Architecture. (first published in Italian in 1948). New York, Horizon Press, 30, 277-8, 282.