Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제29권9호
  • /
  • Pages.1331-1337
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Muscle Fiber and Meat Quality Characteristics in Different Japanese Quail Lines

  • Choi, Y.M. (Department of Animal Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hwang, S. (Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University) ;
  • Lee, K. (Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University)
  • 투고 : 2016.04.26
  • 심사 : 2016.06.16
  • 발행 : 2016.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this study was to compare the growth performance, fiber characteristics of the pectoralis major muscle, and meat quality characteristics in the heavy weight (HW) and random bred control (RBC) quail lines and genders. The HW male exhibited more than two times greater body (245.7 vs 96.1 g, p<0.05) and pectoralis major muscle (PMW; 37.1 vs 11.1 g, p<0.05) weights compared to the RBC female. This growth performance in the HW line was associated with a greater muscle fiber area (1,502 vs $663.0{\mu}m^2$, p<0.001) compared to the RBC line. Greater muscle mass of the HW male was accompanied by a higher percentage of type IIB fiber compared to the HW female (64.0% vs 51.0%, p<0.05). However, muscle fiber hyperplasia (increase in fiber number) has had a somewhat limited effect on PMW between the two lines. On the other hand, the HW line harboring a higher proportion of type IIB fiber showed rapid pH decline at the early postmortem period (6.23 vs 6.41, p<0.05) and lighter meat surface (53.5 vs 47.3, p<0.05) compared to the RBC line harboring a lower proportion of type IIB fiber. There were no significant differences observed in the measurement of water-holding capacity including drip loss (2.74% vs 3.07%, p>0.05) and cooking loss (21.9% vs 20.4%, p>0.05) between the HW and RBC lines. Therefore, the HW quail line developed by selection from the RBC quail, was slightly different in the meat quality characteristics compared to the RBC line, and a marked difference was found in growth performance between the two quail lines.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bottinelli, R., R. Betto, S. Schiaffino, and C. Reggiani. 1994. Unloaded shortening velocity and myosin heavy chain and alkali light chain isoform composition in rat skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 478:341-349. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020254
  2. Brooke, M. H. and K. K. Kaiser. 1970. Three 'myosin adenosine triphosphatase' systems: the nature of their pH lability and sulphydryl dependence. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 18:670-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/18.9.670
  3. Cherel, Y., M. Hurtrel, M. F. Gardahaut, F. Merly, C. Magras-Resch, J. Fontaine-Perus, and M. Wyers. 1994. Comparison of postnatal development of anterior latissimus dorsi (ALD) muscle in heavy- and light-weight strains of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Growth Dev. Aging 58:157-165.
  4. Chiang, W., A. Booren, and G. Strasburg. 2008. The effect of heat stress on thyroid hormone response and meat quality in turkeys of two genetic lines. Meat Sci. 80:615-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.02.012
  5. Choi, Y. M. and B. C. Kim. 2009. Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest. Sci. 122:105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.015
  6. Choi, Y. M., S. Shin, M. P. Wick, J. H. Choe, and K. Lee. 2013. Muscle fiber characteristics of pectoralis major muscle as related to muscle mass in different Japanese quail lines. Animal 7:1665-1670. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001298
  7. Choi, Y. M., Y. C. Ryu, and B. C. Kim. 2007. Influence of myosin heavy- and light chain isoforms on early postmortem glycolytic rate and pork quality. Meat Sci. 76:281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.11.009
  8. Choi, Y. M., Y. Suh, J. Ahn, and K. Lee. 2014a. Muscle hypertrophy in heavy weight Japanese quail line: Delayed muscle maturation and continued muscle growth with prolonged upregulation of myogenic regulatory factors. Poult. Sci. 93:2271-2277. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03844
  9. Choi, Y. M., Y. Suh, S. Shin, and K. Lee. 2014b. Skeletal muscle characterization of Japanese quail line selectively bred for lower body weight as an avian model for delayed muscle growth with hypoplasia. PLoS ONE 9:e95932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095932
  10. CIE (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage). 1978. Recommendations on uniform color spaces - color differences equations, psychrometic color terms (Supplement No. 2). CIE Publication No. 15 (E1.3.1), Paris, France.
  11. Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, J. L. Emmert, and C. M. Owens. 2007. Meat quality of slow-and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poult. Sci. 86:2245-2255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2245
  12. FASS (The Federation of Animal Science Societies). 1999. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. 1st rev. edn. Federation of Animal Sciences Societies, Savoy, IL, USA.
  13. Fowler, S. P., D. R. Campion, H. L. Marks, and J. O. Reagan. 1980. An analysis of skeletal muscle response to selection for rapid growth in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Growth 44:235-252.
  14. Honikel, K. O. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49:447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
  15. Huff-Lonergan, E. and S. M. Lonergan. 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 71:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
  16. Jeong, D. W., Y. M. Choi, S. H. Lee, J. H. Choe, K. C. Hong, H. C. Park, and B. C. Kim. 2010. Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs. Meat Sci. 86:607-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.011
  17. Karlsson, A. H., R. E. Klont, and X. Fernandez. 1999. Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 60:255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00098-6
  18. Lind, A. and D. Kernell. 1991. Myofibrillar ATPase histochemistry of rat skeletal muscles: a "two-dimensional" quantitative approach. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39:589-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/39.5.1826695
  19. Lopez, K. P., M. W. Schilling, and A. Corzo. 2011. Broiler genetic strain and sex effects on meat characteristics. Poult. Sci. 90:1105-1111. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01154
  20. Narinc, D., T. Aksoy, E. Karaman, A. Aygun, M. Z. Firat, and M. K. Uslu. 2013. Japanese quail meat quality: Characteristics, heritabilities, and genetic correlations with some slaughter traits. Poult. Sci. 92:1735-1744. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03075
  21. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. edn. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  22. Oksbjerg, N., P. Henckel, T. Rolph, and T. Erlandsen. 1994. Effects of salbutamol, a ${\beta}_2$-adrenergic agonist, on muscles of growing pigs fed different levels of dietary protein. I. Muscle fibre properties and muscle protein accretion. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 44:12-19.
  23. Petracci, M., M. Bianchi, and C. Cavani. 2009. The European perspective on pale, soft, exudative conditions in poultry. Poult. Sci. 88:1518-1523. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00508
  24. Pette, D. and R. S. Staron. 2001. Transitions of muscle fiber phenotypic profiles. Histochem. Cell Biol. 115:359-372.
  25. Picard, B., C. Jurie, M. P. Duris, and G. Renand. 2006. Consequences of selection for higher growth rate on muscle fibre development in cattle. Livest. Sci. 102:107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2005.12.001
  26. Rehfeldt, C., I. Fiedler, G. Dietl, and K. Ender. 2000. Myogenesis and postnatal skeletal muscle cell growth as influenced by selection. Livest. Prod. Sci. 66:177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00225-6
  27. Rehfeldt, C., M. Henning, and I. Fiedler. 2008. Consequences of pig domestication for skeletal muscle growth and cellularity. Livest. Sci. 116:30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.017
  28. Remignon, H., A. D. Mills, D. Guemene, V. Desrosiers, M. Garreau-Mills, M. Marche, and G. Marche. 1998. Meat quality traits and muscle characteristics in high and low fear lines of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) subjected to acute stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:372-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669888926
  29. Remignon, H., M. F. Gardahaut, G. Marche, and F. H. Ricard. 1995. Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscle fibers without changing their typing in chickens. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 16:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122527
  30. Ruusunen, M. and E. Puolanne. 2004. Histochemical properties of fibre types in muscles of wild and domestic pigs and the effect of growth rate on muscle fibre properties. Meat Sci. 67:533-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.12.008
  31. Ryu, Y. C. and B. C. Kim. 2005. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics, postmortem metabolic rate, and meat quality of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci. 71:351-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.015
  32. SAS Institute. 2009. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9.3. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  33. Scheuermann, G. N., S. F. Bilgili, S. Tuzun, and D. R. Mulvaney. 2004. Comparison of chicken genotypes: myofiber number in pectoralis muscle and myostatin ontogeny. Poult. Sci. 83:1404-1412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1404
  34. Shin, S., Y. M. Choi, Y. Suh, and K. Lee. 2015. Delta-like 1 homolog (DLK1) inhibits proliferation and myotube formation of avian QM7 myoblasts. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 179:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2014.09.006
  35. Velleman, S. G., C. S. Coy, J. W. Anderson, R. A. Patterson, and K. E. Nestor. 2003. Effect of selection for growth rate and inheritance on posthatch muscle development in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 82:1365-1372. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.9.1365
  36. Velleman, S. G., C. S. Coy, J. W. Anderson, R. A. Patterson, and K. E. Nestor. 2002. Effect of selection for growth rate on embryonic breast muscle development in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 81:1113-1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.8.1113

피인용 문헌

  1. Study on the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of the MyoD1 gene in Guanling bovine vol.8, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11795G
  2. Poultry Meat Quality in Relation to Muscle Growth and Muscle Fiber Characteristics vol.37, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.6.873
  3. Correlation of Marbling Characteristics with Meat Quality and Histochemical Characteristics in Longissimus Thoracis Muscle from Hanwoo Steers vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e12
  4. MEAT COLOUR CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTIVE TYPES DOMESTIC QUAILS vol.17, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2019.01.007
  5. Effect of chronic AICAR treatment on muscle fiber composition and enzyme activity in skeletal muscle of rats vol.49, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1889563