DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Use of Fermented Soybean Meals during Early Phase Affects Subsequent Growth and Physiological Response in Broiler Chicks

  • Kim, S.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, T.H. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, S.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Chang, K.H. (CJ Cheiljedang Ltd.) ;
  • Cho, S.J. (CJ Cheiljedang Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, K.W. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • An, B.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.08
  • 심사 : 2016.01.26
  • 발행 : 2016.09.01

초록

The objectives of this experiment was to evaluate the subsequent growth and organ weights, blood profiles and cecal microbiota of broiler chicks fed pre-starter diets containing fermented soybean meal products during early phase. A total of nine hundred 1-d-old chicks were randomly assigned into six groups with six replicates of 25 chicks each. The chicks were fed control pre-starter diet with dehulled soybean meal (SBM) or one of five experimental diets containing fermented SBM products (Bacillus fermented SBM [BF-SBM], yeast by product and Bacillus fermented SBM [YBF-SBM]; Lactobacillus fermented SBM 1 [LF-SBM 1]; Lactobacillus fermented SBM 2 [LF-SBM 2]) or soy protein concentrate (SPC) for 7 d after hatching, followed by 4 wk feeding of commercial diets without fermented SBMs or SPC. The fermented SBMs and SPC were substituted at the expense of dehulled SBM at 3% level on fresh weight basis. The body weight (BW) during the starter period was not affected by dietary treatments, but BW at 14 d onwards was significantly higher (p<0.05) in chicks that had been fed BF-SBM and YBF-SBM during the early phase compared with the control group. The feed intake during grower and finisher phases was not affected (p>0.05) by dietary treatments. During total rearing period, the daily weight gains in six groups were 52.0 (control), 57.7 (BF-SBM), 58.5 (YBF-SBM), 52.0 (LF-SBM 1), 56.7 (LF-SBM 2), and 53.3 g/d (SPC), respectively. The daily weight gain in chicks fed diet containing BF-SBM, YBF-SBM, and LF-SBM 2 were significantly higher values (p<0.001) than that of the control group. Chicks fed BF-SBM, YBF-SBM, and LF-SBM 2 had significantly lower (p<0.01) feed conversion ratio compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in the relative weight of various organs and blood profiles among groups. Cecal microbiota was altered by dietary treatments. At 35 d, chicks fed on the pre-starter diets containing BF-SBM and YBF-SBM had significantly increased (p<0.001) lactic acid bacteria, but lowered Coli-form bacteria in cecal contents compared with those fed the control diet. The number of Bacillus spp. was higher (p<0.001) in all groups except for LF-SBM 1 compared with control diet-fed chicks. At 7 d, jejunal villi were significantly lengthened (p<0.001) in chicks fed the fermented SBMs vs control diet. Collectively, the results indicate that feeding of fermented SBMs during early phase are beneficial to the subsequent growth performance in broiler chicks. BF-SBM and YBF-SBM showed superior overall growth performance as compared with unfermented SBM and SPC.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) International. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Arlington, VA, USA.
  2. Batal, A. B. and C. M. Parsons. 2002. Effect of fasting versus feeding oasis after hatching on nutrient utilization in chicks. Poult. Sci. 81:853-859. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.853
  3. Caspary, W. F. 1992. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 55:299S-308S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/55.1.299s
  4. Caruso, M., A. Demonte, and V. A. Neves. 2012. Histomorphometric study of role of lactoferrin in atrophy of the intestinal mucosa of rats. Health 4:1362-1370. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2012.412198
  5. Chah, C. C., C. W. Carlson, G. Semeniuk, I. S. Palmer, and C. W. Hesseltine. 1975. Growth-promoting effects of fermented soybeans for broilers. Poult. Sci. 54:600-609. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0540600
  6. Choct, M., Y. Dersjant-Li, J. McLeish, and M. Peisker. 2010. Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: A review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian Australas J. Anim. Sci. 23:1386-1398. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90222
  7. Ducan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  8. Feng, J., X. Liu, Z. R. Xu, Y. Y. Liu, and Y. P. Lu. 2007a. Effects of Aspergillus oryzae 3.042 fermented soybean meal on growth performance and plasma biochemical parameters in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 134:235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.018
  9. Feng, J., X. Liu, Z. R. Xu, Y. Z. Wang, and J. X. Liu. 2007b. Effects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. Poult. Sci. 86:1149-1154. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1149
  10. Hirabayashi, M., T. Matsui, H. Yano, and T. Nakajima. 1998. Fermentation of soybean meal with Aspergillus usamii reduces phosphorus excretion in chicks. Poult. Sci. 77:552-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.4.552
  11. Hong, K. J., C. H., Lee, and S. W. Kim. 2004. Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and feed soybean meals. J. Med. Food 7:430-435. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2004.7.430
  12. Jeong, J. S. and I. H. Kim. 2015. Comparative efficacy of up to 50% partial fish meal replacement with fermented soybean meal or enzymatically prepared soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microflora in weaned pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 86:624-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12335
  13. Lee, B. K., J. Y. Kim, J. S. Kim, S. J. You, B. K. An, E. J. Kim, and C. W. Kang. 2009. Nutritional value of soybean meal from various geographic origin and effect of their dietary supplementation on performance of broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 51:217-224. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2009.51.3.217
  14. Li, C. Y., J. J. Lu, C. P. Wu, and T. F. Lien. 2014. Effects of probiotics and bremelain fermented soybean meal replacing fish meal on growth performance, nutrient retention and carcass traits of broilers. Livest. Sci. 163:94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.02.005
  15. Mathivanan, R., P. Selvaraj, and K. Nanjappan. 2006. Feeding of fermented soybean meal on broiler performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5:868-872. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.868.872
  16. Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 238:235-237.
  17. Nir, I., Z. Nitsan, and M. Mahagna. 1993. Comparative growth and development of digestive organs and of some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417607
  18. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  19. NRC (National Research Council). 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th rev. edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  20. SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute. 2002. SAS User's Guide. Statistics, version. 8edn. Statistical Analysis System Institute. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  21. Scholten, R. H. J., C. M. C. Van der Peet-Schwering, L. A. den Hartog, M. Balk, J. W. Schrama, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2002. Fermented wheat in liquid diets: Effects on gastrointestinal characteristics in weanling piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1179-1186. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8051179x
  22. Spackman, D. H., W. H. Stein, and S. Moore. 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in the chromatography of amino acid. Anal. Chem. 30:1190-1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60139a006
  23. Zuidhof, M. J., B. L. Schneider, V. L. Carney, D. R. Korver, and F. E. Robinson. 2014. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial boilers from 1957, 1873, and 2005. Poult. Sci. 93:2970-2982. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04291

피인용 문헌

  1. Mixed fermentation of soybean meal by protease and probiotics and its effects on the growth performance and immune response in broilers vol.47, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1637344
  2. Soy Intake Since the Prepubertal Age May Contribute to the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis in Adulthood vol.22, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2018.0160
  3. Identification of immunogenic epitopes of two soybean glycinin proteins in chicken vol.31, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2019.1700930
  4. Partial Substitution of Fermented Soybean Meal for Soybean Meal Influences the Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Broiler Chickens vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020225
  5. The Effect of Diet with Fermented Soybean Meal on Blood Metabolites and Redox Status of Chickens vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0009
  6. Effects of Fermented Soybean Meal Supplementation on the Growth Performance and Cecal Microbiota Community of Broiler Chickens vol.10, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061098
  7. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on the energy status and antioxidant capacity in heart and liver of cold-stressed broilers vol.33, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0542
  8. Effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with high-temperature fermented soybean meal in antibiotic-growth-promoter-free diets on growth performance, organ weights, serum indexes, intestinal flor vol.269, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114616
  9. Identification of epitopes in the α and β subunits of soybean β-conglycinin immunogenic in chickens vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2021.1911960
  10. Effects of Soy Protein Concentrate in Starter Phase Diet on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemical Indices, Carcass Traits, Immune Organ Indices and Meat Quality of Broilers vol.11, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020281
  11. Effects of Different Fermented Feeds on Production Performance, Cecal Microorganisms, and Intestinal Immunity of Laying Hens vol.11, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102799