Performance Evaluation of Aprons according to Lead Equivalent and Form Types

방사선 방어용 앞치마의 납당량, 형태에 따른 성능 평가

  • Kim, Ki-Won (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital at Gangdong) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Hyun (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital at Gangdong) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Yeol (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital at Gangdong) ;
  • Lee, Ik-Pyo (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital at Gangdong) ;
  • Hwang, Sun-Gwang (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital at Gangdong) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University)
  • 김기원 (강동경희대병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최성현 (강동경희대병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김기열 (강동경희대병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이익표 (강동경희대병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 황선광 (강동경희대병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 동경래 (광주보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2016.09.29
  • Accepted : 2016.12.07
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

The apron is one of the essential protectors to reduce the exposure dose of radiological technologists. This study is to provide a guideline for purchasing the aprons with excellent performance and to help reducing the exposure dose by measuring the shielding ration and uniformity of aprons according to lead equivalent and form types. The shielding ratio of aprons were measured by using radiation generator and dosimeter. Exposure conditions were 81 kVp, 25 mAs, source to image receptor distance (SID) 100 cm and field of view (FOV) $17^{{\prime}{\prime}}{\times}17^{{\prime}{\prime}}$. Exposure areas for front type and around type aprons were divided into 9 areas and for 2 pieces type aprons were divided into 3 areas of top and 4 areas of skirt. The uniformity of aprons were measured by using fluoroscopy and Image J. The 4 regions of interest (ROI) were set into acquired images and measured uniformity by measuring the standard deviation of pixel intensity in ROIs. In continuous shielding ration measurement of aprons according to exposure area, there was not statistical significance (P>0.05). In ANOVA test of aprons, there was statistical significance (P<0.01). In the results of sheilding ratio, although the aprons had equal lead equivalent, there were difference in shielding ratio from 83.59% to 98.15%. In the results of uniformity, the front type aprons with equal lead equivalent indicated the similar uniformity. However, the around type and 2 pieces type apron with equal lead equivalent indicated the different uniformity each other, from 1.8 to 22.2. If the performance evaluation in this study were conducted regularly before and after purchase the aprons, the exposure does to patients and radiological technologists could be reduced.

Keywords