Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics (대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구)

The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics (대한수학교육학회)
권호 표지

A Meta-Analysis of Research Trends in Mathematics Learning Disabilities

수학학습장애 연구 동향 메타분석

  • Received : 2016.07.10
  • Accepted : 2016.08.11
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was designed as a meta-analysis to investigate the research trends in mathematics learning disabilities(MLD) area. The results of this study were as follows: The 201 researches targeted for the analysis can be categorized 4: characteristic of students with MLD, screening students with MLD, interventional teaching for students with MLD, and et cetera. Also, the outcomes of researches regarding intervention in MLD determined to have a large effect resulted in a total average of 0.958. Especially, as a result of analysing the effect size in accordance with teaching method variables in group-case designed researches, the effect was largest when direct instruction and strategy instruction was given. The effect was largest when the frequency of intervention was over 16 and under 20. The results in this study be summed up as follows. MLD can be served as a foundation in setting a direction for further research to improve in Korea.

본 연구는 국내와 국외의 수학학습장애 분야에서 수행된 연구들의 전체적인 흐름을 분석하고, 수학학습장애 학생에 대한 중재 연구의 효과를 메타분석 하였다. 연구 결과, 분석 대상 논문 201편은 크게 4가지의 주제로서 수학학습장애 학생의 특성, 수학학습장애 학생의 선별, 수학학습장애 학생을 위한 중재 교수, 기타(메타분석, 교사인식 및 교육과정)로 구분되었다. 또한 수학학습장애 중재 연구는 집단 대상 연구의 전체 평균 효과 크기가 .958로 나타나 수학학습장애 학생의 중재는 효과가 큰 것으로 파악되었다. 특히, 교수방법의 효과크기는 전략교수와 직접교수를 혼합한 교수에서 가장 크게 나타났다. 중재횟수는 16회 이상 20회 이하일 때 효과가 크게 나타났으며 횟수가 증가할수록 효과크기가 작아졌다. 이러한 메타분석 결과는 후속 수학학습장애 연구 방향을 설정하는데 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동일, 이대식, 신종호 (2009). 학습장애아동의 이해와 교육(2판). 학지사.
  2. 김영표 (2008). 수학 문장제 문제해결력 중재 효과 메타분석. 단국대학교 대학원. 박사학위논문.
  3. 송혜향 (2003). 의학, 간호학, 사회과학 연구의 메타분석법. 서울: 청문각.
  4. 오성삼 (2009). 메타분석의 이론과 실제. 건국대학교 출판부.
  5. 이성용.김진호 (2011). 자기교시 중재 효과에 대한 메타분석. 특수교육학연구, 제 46권 제3호, 163-189.
  6. 전윤희, 장경윤(2013). 학습장애 또는 학습부진 학생들의 수학문장제 문제해결력 중재효과에 대한 메타분석. 특수교육학연구, 47(4), 139-163.
  7. 전윤희, 장경윤(2014). 학습부진 또는 학습장애 위험군 학생들의 비와 비례 문장제 문제해결 향상시키기. 학교수학, 16(4), 659-675.
  8. 특수교육진흥법 (1994). 국가법령정보센터. http://law.go.kr/LSW.
  9. 한국교육개발원 (2004). 국제 교육동향 제1호 [OECD 정책보고] 교육과 평등. http://edpolicy.kedi.re.kr/
  10. Council for Learning Disabilities: CLD, 2013). http://www.council-for-learning-disabilities.org/mathematics-disabilities.
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
  13. Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic deficits. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
  14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. Schumather R. F., & Seethaler, P. M. (2013). Instructional intervention for students with mathematics learning disabilities. Swanson, Handbook of Learning Disabilities(second ed.). New York: Guilford.
  15. Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilties : Cognitive, neuropsychological, and gentic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.345
  16. Gersten. R., Chard. D. J., Jayanthi. M., Baker. S.K., Morphy. P., & Flojo. J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202-1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
  17. Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Ward, D. (2013). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). Handbook of Learning Disabilities(second ed.). New York: Guilford.
  18. Healy, L., & Powell, A. B. (2013). Understanding and Overcoming "Disadvantage" in Learning Mathematics. Clements, M. A., Bishop, A. J., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (eds). Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer.
  19. Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H. L. (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review. 29, 102-119.
  20. Kirk, S. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for School mathematics. 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준, 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 옮김, 경문사.
  22. Seo, Y., Bryant, D. P. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instructionon the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53, 913-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.002
  23. Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084184
  24. Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). Handbook of Learning Disabilities (second ed.). New York: Guilford.
  25. Tanaka, H., Black, J., Hulme, C., Leanne, S,, Kesler, S., & Whitfield, G., (2011). The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychological Science, 22, 1442-1451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419521
  26. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computerassisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in studetns at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes form two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y
  27. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction. The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
  28. Xin, Y. P. & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problem for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education. 32(4), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903200402