Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A combined approach to non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession

  • Yang, SungEun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul St. Mary's Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, HyeJin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul St. Mary's Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jin, Sung-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Seoul St. Mary's Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2016.01.12
  • Accepted : 2016.03.17
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with gingival recession require specific consideration on both aspects of hard and soft tissue lesion. In the restorative aspect, careful finishing and polishing of the restorations prior to mucogingival surgery is the critical factor contributing to success. Regarding surgery, assessment of the configuration of the lesion and the choice of surgical technique are important factors. The precise diagnosis and the choice of the proper treatment procedure should be made on the basis of both restorative and surgical considerations to ensure the successful treatment of NCCLs.

Keywords

References

  1. Mair LH. Wear in dentistry - current terminology. J Dent 1992;20:140-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90125-V
  2. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:725-733. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  3. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of three dentine bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions without enamel etching. Aust Dent J 1988;33:177-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb01311.x
  4. Zucchelli G, Gori G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions: a decision-making process. J Periodontol 2011;82:1713-1724. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110080
  5. Jonck LM, Grobbelaar CJ. Strating H. The biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cement in joint replacement: bulk testing. Clin Mater 1989;4:85-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(89)90001-2
  6. Vandewalle KS, Vigil G. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent 1997;45:254-260.
  7. Deliberador TM, Martins TM, Furlaneto FA, Klingenfuss M, Bosco AF. Use of connective tissue graft for the coverage of composite resin-restored root surfaces in maxillary central incisors. Quintessence Int 2012;43:597-602.
  8. Lucchesi JA, Santos VR, Amaral CM, Peruzzo DC, Duarte PM. Coronally positioned flap for treatment of restored root surfaces: a 6-month clinical evaluation. J Periodontol 2007;78:615-623. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060380
  9. Santamaria MP, Ambrosano GM, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum AW, Sallum EA. Connective tissue graft and resin glass ionomer for the treatment of gingival recession associated with noncarious cervical lesions: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2011;31:e57-e63.
  10. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 1985;5:8-13.
  11. Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Mounssif l, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L. Predetermination of root coverage. J Periodontol 2010;81:1019-1026. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090701
  12. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival surgery. In: Lang NP, Karring T, editors. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1994. p193-209.
  13. Camargo PM, Lagos RA, Lekovic V, Wolinsky LE. Soft tissue root coverage as treatment for cervical abrasion and caries. Gen Dent 2001;49:299-304.
  14. Schatzle M, Land NP, Anerud A, Boysen H, Burgin W, Loe H. The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280109.x
  15. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol 2000;71:1506-1514. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506
  16. Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol 2006;77:714-721. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050038
  17. Bignozzi I, Littarru C, Crea A, Vittorini Orgeas G, Landi L. Surgical treatment options for grafting areas of gingival recession association with cervical lesions: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:371-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12058
  18. Alkan A, Keskiner I, Yuzbasioglu E. Connective tissue grafting on resin ionomer in localized gingival recession. J Periodontol 2006;77:1446-1451. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060021
  19. Martins TM, Bosco AF, Nobrega FJ, Nagata MJ, Garcia VG, Fucini SE. Periodontal tissue response to coverage of root cavities restored with resin materials: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2007;78:1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060457
  20. Gomes SC, Miranda LA, Soares I, Oppermann RV. Clinical and histologic evaluation of the periodontal response to restorative procedures in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2005;25:39-47.
  21. Bruno JF. Connective tissue graft technique assuring wide root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 1994;14:126-137.
  22. Harris RJ. Connective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patients. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2002;22:463-471.
  23. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-720. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715