DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

To Use Facebook for Good: Usage, Cyberbullying Involvement, and Perceived Social Support

  • Received : 2016.02.23
  • Accepted : 2016.08.17
  • Published : 2016.08.29

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the extent of Facebook usage and social well-being with consideration of cyberbullying involvement using a person-oriented approach. Survey data were collected from a sample of 312 secondary students from Grades 7 and 8 in Hong Kong. Levels of cyberbullying involvement, Facebook usage and perceived social support were investigated. Participants were classified into three clusters based on the different levels of Facebook usage and cyberbullying victimization through cluster analyses (i.e., frequent Facebook user/noncyberbullied victim, frequent Facebook user/cyberbullied victim, and uninvolved). Our results showed that frequent Facebook users who are cyberbullied tend to engage in cyberbullying perpetration significantly more than the frequent Facebook users who are not cyberbullied, even when the latter reported higher Facebook usage. This result provides some support for the idea that cyberbullying victimization has additional value on top of the level of usage in explaining one's participation in cyberbullying perpetration. As expected, frequent Facebook users who were not cyberbullied reported the highest perceived social support among the three groups. What is even more interesting is the equal level of perceived social support found between the cyberbullied victims and the uninvolved. Our results suggest that, although limiting adolescents' Internet use might reduce their risks of being involved in cyberbullying, it might also take away the potential benefits they could get from interacting with the online community. Benefits of using the person-oriented approach in the study of cyberbullying are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Accordino, D. B., & Accordino, M. P. (2011). An exploratory study of face-to-face and cyberbullying in sixth grade students. American Secondary Education, 40(1), 14-30.
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6
  3. Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001
  4. Beckman, L., Hagquist, C., & Hellstrom, L. (2013). Discrepant gender patterns for cyberbullying and traditional bullying-An analysis of Swedish adolescent data. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1896-1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.010
  5. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH
  6. Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. ACM CHI 2010: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1909-1912.
  7. Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estevez, A., Villardon, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors' profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
  8. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68
  9. Census and Statistics Department (2013). Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics. Retrieved from website: http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B10100032013AN13B0100.pdf
  10. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389
  11. Erdur-Baker, O. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of Internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341260
  12. Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revision. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 233-254.
  13. Gore, P. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modelling (pp. 297-321). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  14. Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G. A., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
  15. Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). "I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life": Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society, 6, 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804044331
  16. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant behavior, 29, 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
  17. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
  18. Hong Kong Breakthrough (2013). 香港靑少年媒體使用情況 [Internet usage among Hong Kong adolescents]. Retrieved from website: https://www.breakthrough.org.hk/ir/Research/51_Youth_media_usage_2013/figure.pdf
  19. Hong Kong Federal of Youth Group (2010). A Study on Cyber-bullying among Hong Kong Secondary Students. Retrieved from website: http://yrc.hkfyg.org.hk/files/yrc/yrc_ys44.pdf
  20. Huang, Y. Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581-1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005
  21. Internet World Stats. (2015). Internet usage statistics: The Internet big picture. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  22. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?-Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x
  23. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
  24. Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., ... & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PloS ONE, 8(8), e69841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069841
  25. Kwan, G. C. E., & Skoric, M. M. (2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014
  26. Leung, A. N. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2013). Game on? Online friendship, cyberbullying, and psychosocial adjustment in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 32, 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.2.159
  27. Mark, L., & Ratliffe, K. T. (2011). Cyber worlds: New playgrounds for bullying. Computers in the Schools, 28(2), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.575753
  28. Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22(3), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600677805
  29. Park, S., Na, E. Y., & Kim, E. M. (2014). The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.002
  30. Riebel, J., Jaeger, R. S., & Fischer, U. C. (2009). Cyberbullying in Germany-An exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 298-314.
  31. Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). 'I h8 u': Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 643-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903071918
  32. Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
  33. Snell, P. A., & Englander, E. K. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization and behaviors among girls: Applying research findings in the field. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 510-514. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.510.514
  34. Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2136
  35. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
  36. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  37. Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimisation and perpetration. Children & Society, 25(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x
  38. Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
  39. Ward, J. H. (1963), Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
  40. Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of Internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S14-S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
  41. Wong, D. S., Chan, H. C. O., & Cheng, C. H. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.006
  42. Wong, N. (in press). Risk factors of cyberbullying: A moderating role of culture. In M. F. Wright (Ed.), A social-ecological approach to cyberbullying. Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
  43. Yang, S. J., Stewart, R., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., Dewey, M. E, ... Yoon, J. S. (2013). Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: A 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-012-0374-6
  44. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007
  45. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics, 118, e1169-e1177. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0815
  46. Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Tian, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, F., & Morrison, C. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and Its Risk Factors among Chinese High School Students. School Psychology International, 34(6), 630-647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479692
  47. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2

Cited by

  1. Hot Topics of Teenage Students’ Cyberbullying Based on Web of Science vol.8, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.84036