DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Traditional Dairy Products in Baotou and Bayannur of Midwestern Inner Mongolia and q-PCR Analysis of Predominant Species

  • Wang, Dan (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Wenjun (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Ren, Yan (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • De, Liangliang (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Donglei (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Yang, Yanrong (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Bao, Qiuhua (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Heping (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University) ;
  • Menghe, Bilige (Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2016.02.17
  • Accepted : 2016.06.08
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

In this study, traditional culture method and 16S rRNA gene analysis were applied to reveal the composition and diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of fermented cow milk, huruud and urum from Baotou and Bayannur of midwestern Inner Mongolia. Also, the quantitative results of dominant LAB species in three different types of dairy products from Baotou and Bayannur were gained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) technology. Two hundred and two LAB strains isolated from sixty-six samples were identified and classified into four genera, namely Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and twenty-one species and subspecies. From these isolates, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (32.18%), Lactobacillus plantarum (12.38%) and Leuconosto mesenteroides (11.39%) were considered as the dominated LAB species under the condition of cultivating in MRS and M17 medium. And the q-PCR results revealed that the number of dominant species varied from samples to samples and from region to region. This study clearly shows the composition and diversity of LAB existing in fermented cow milk, huruud and urum, which could be considered as valuable resources for LAB isolation and further probiotic selection.

Keywords

Introduction

Traditional dairy products are the natural habitats of microbes, especially lactic acid bacteria. The Mongolian race is well-known for their production and consumption of dairy products; thus, a large number of natural LAB strains presented in these dairy products have passed from generation to generation during the households manufacturing process. Baotou and Bayannur are located in the midwest of Inner Mongolia with rich natural pastoral areas, which could contributed to the dairy production. The local inhabitants use traditional methods to produce unique and diverse fermented foods and the numerous households have developed and handed down their own characteristic dairy products. These traditional fermented dairy products include fermented cow milk, urum, huruud, kumiss, tarag (fermented milk of cows, yaks, goats or camels), airag (an alcoholic fermented horse milk), yak milk, goat milk, kurut and so on, what’s more, these products were made by natural fermentation without adding any commercial starter cultures. Rhee et al. (2011) suggested that lactic acid bacteria are widely distributed in natural fermented foods as indigenous microflora. Also previous studies have been performed to analyze the diversity of the microbial species existing in traditional fermented dairy products in various locations, such as Turkey (Gurses and Erdogan, 2006), Africa (Mathara et al., 2004), Italy (Losio et al., 2014), Mongolia (Takeda et al., 2013), Iran (Azadnia and Khan Nazer, 2009), Morocco (Ouadghiri et al., 2009) etc.

Our research team has integrally and systematically analyzed the biodiversity of LAB in various conventional dairy foods in different minority regions of China, for instance, Yunnan (Liu et al., 2009), Sichuan (Bao et al., 2012b), Gansu (Bao et al., 2012a), Qinghai (Sun et al., 2010), eastern Inner Mongolia (Liu et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2011), Tibetan (Chen et al., 2010) and Xinjiang (Sun et al., 2009). In addition, we have already screened out numerous novel strains for their functional properties and desirable beneficial effects, including Lactobacillus (Lb.) casei Zhang (Wu et al., 2009), Lb. plantarum P-8 (Wang et al., 2013) and Lb. helveticus H9 (Chen et al., 2014). Our previous studies have demonstrated that traditional dairy products are rich sources for isolating precious LAB resources.

To our knowledge, there were only limited studies that described LAB composition present in urum, huruud in midwestern Inner Mongolia. Here, we isolated and characterized the LAB communities in sixty-six samples of urum, huruud and fermented cow milk that were collected from two regions named Baotou and Bayannur in midwestern Inner Mongolia by traditional culture method and 16S rRNA gene analysis. To precisely depict the dominant LAB populations, quantitative polymerase chain reaction method was applied.

 

Materials and Methods

Collection of samples

Three types of samples including fermented cow milk (fermented at room temperature with the household’s traditional starter), huruud (dry curd of cheese produced by boiling the spontaneously fermented cow milk and squeezing the sediment) and urum (cow milk spontaneously fermented over a day at room temperature in the household’s traditional wooden cask and then on the surface of the dairy would form the thin cream called urum) were produced by nomadic families. Sixty-six samples were collected from thirteen sampling sites located in two cities called Baotou and Bayannur, the midwest of Inner Mongolia, in June 2015. About 50 mL of each sample was aseptically collected and stored in sterile polyethylene bottle. The collected samples were then transported to our laboratory in a vehicle-mounted refrigerator kept at 4℃, followed by longer term storage at 80℃ in the laboratory until further microbiological analysis and LAB isolation. The information of samples is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.DM: samples from Baotou; BM: samples from Bayannur.

Enumeration and isolation of LAB

One milliliter of a sample was mixed with 9 mL sterile physiological saline (0.85% w/v, NaCl) to make an initial dilution. Serial dilutions were made for each sample and then 1 mL of the appropriate dilution was mixed with the melted MRS agar to enumerate the total LAB with the pour plate method. Cycloheximide at a concentration of 0.01% (v/v) was added to the MRS plates in order to prevent the growth of fungi. Meanwhile, the appropriate dilution were evenly spread onto the MRS (Difco Laboratories, USA) and M17 (Oxoid Ltd., UK) plates before being incubated under anaerobic condition at 30℃ for 48-72 h. Colonies with distinct morphological differences (based on color, shape, size, rough or smooth surface) were selected and then purified using another agar plate of the same culture medium. The catalase activity and Gram reaction of all the isolates were assessed. Gram-positive, catalase-negative and non-motile microorganisms were preserved in 10% (w/v) skim milk containing 0.1% (w/v) sodium glutamate and stored at 80℃.

16S rRNA gene sequences analysis

DNA was extracted from strains that grew in MRS and M17 culture broth at 37℃ by a revised cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. Purified DNA template was diluted to 100 ng/μL for 16S rRNA gene amplification. The 27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1495R (5’-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3’) primers were used for amplification of the partial 16S rRNA gene (Liu et al., 2009).

The PCR mix (50 μL) contained 2 μL DNA templates (100 ng/μL), 5 μL 10 × buffer (Mg2+), 4 μL dNTP (10 mmol/L), 1.5 μL primer FA-27F (10 pmol/μL), 1.5 μL primer RA-1495R (10 pmol/μL) , 0.5 μL Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) and 35.5 μL tri-distilled water. The thermal cycling program consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94℃ for 5 min and 30 cycles of 94℃ for 1 min, 58℃ for 1 min and 72℃ for 2 min with a final extension at 72℃ for 10 min and 4℃ for heat preservation. PCR amplification was carried out on an automatic thermal cycler (PTC-200, MJ Research, USA). The sequencing of purified products was performed by Shanghai Sangni Biosciences Corporation of China. Subsequently, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of all isolates were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, http://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for BLAST search. MEGA version 6.0 software (http://www.mega software.net) was used to create phylogenetic trees by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method.

Quantification of predominant LAB in dairy products

Total DNA of each sample was extracted as described previously (Lick et al. 1996; Xu et al. 2014). The DNA quality was checked by the spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis. All extracted DNA were stored at 20℃ until further processing. The predominant LAB in traditional dairy products in Baotou and Bayannur of midwestern Inner Mongolia were enumerated by q-PCR, as listed in Table 2.

Table 2.Specific primer pairs used for q-PCR Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc.

Q-PCR was carried out on an ABI Step-One detection system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The PCR mix (20 μL) contained 2 μL DNA templates (100 ng/μL), 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq, 0.4 μL 50 × ROX, 0.4 μL primer F, 0.4 μL primer R and 6.8 μL tri-distilled water. The thermal cycling program consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95℃ for 20 s and 40 cycles of 95℃ for 20 s, 60℃ for 40 s and 72℃ for 50 s. Melting curve analysis was performed at 95℃ for 15 s, 75℃ for 1 min and 95℃ for 15 s to assess the specificities of the amplifications.

 

Results

Enumeration of total LAB

The average count of total LAB of the three types of dairy food samples collected from Baotou and Bayannur are presented in Table 1. The LAB viable counts of these sixty-six samples ranged from 6.74 to 9.15 Log CFU/mL. As can be seen from Table 1, the average count of LAB from urum in Bayannur was 8.7 Log CFU/mL, which was slightly higher than that of Baotou (8.01 Log CFU/mL). No significant difference was shown between the LAB counts of fermented cow milk and huruud collected from the two sampling cities. Urum and huruud collected from Baotou showed a lower average LAB count than fermented cow milk. In contrast, urum from Bayannur had the highest detectable LAB compared to huruud and fermented cow milk.

16S rRNA gene sequences and phylogenetic analysis

After isolation and purification, we obtained two hundred and thirty-seven Gram-positive and catalase-negative isolates, which were presumptively identified as LAB. Subsequently, 60% of the isolates were rod-shaped (67 and 75 isolates cultivated from MRS and M17, respectively), while the remaining ones were cocci (70 and 25 isolates cultivated from MRS and M17, respectively).

To precisely confirm the identity of these isolates at species level, the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene (around 1,400 bp) was determined and searched with the NCBI BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for their closest relatives/reference strains with an homology of over or equal to 99%. Phylogenetic tree analysis (Fig. 1) was performed to reveal the relationship between the representative isolates and the known reference strains.

Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showing the phylogenetic placement of representative strains isolated from traditional dairy products. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replications) greater than 50% are given at nodes. Scale bar: 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide.

The phylogenetic analysis categorized all isolates into five clusters (−) and eight sub-clusters (i-viii), including four genera and twenty-one species and subspecies (Fig. 1). Cluster and cluster were the Lactobacillus (Lb.) group, containing the sub-cluster i, ii, iii, v (Lb. buchneri, Lb. otakiensis, Lb. diolivorans, Lb. brevis, Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lb. plantarum, Lb. rhamnosus, Lb. casei, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lb. paracasei, Lb. helveticus, Lb. kefiranofaciens). Cluster was the Enterococcus (E.) group including E. faecalis, E. sulfureus, E. durans, E. faecium. Cluster was the Lactococcus (Lac.) lactis subsp. lactis group. Cluster was the Leuconostoc (Leu.) containing sub-cluster vii, viii (Leu. lactis, Leu. pseudomesenteroides, Leu. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides, Leu. mesenteroides).

Diversity of isolated LAB strains

These 202 LAB isolates belonged to 21 species and subspecies (Table 3). The obtained nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank and assigned the following accession numbers: KP63871 to KP64073.

Table 3.E., Enterococcus; Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc. n: the number of samples. -: not detected.

Lac. lactis subsp. lactis was the largest taxonomic group, consisting 65 strains (32% of the total isolates). The second most frequent species was Lb. plantarum, comprising 12.3% of all isolates, followed by Leu. mesenteroides accounting for 11.33% of the total isolates. The amounts of LAB in fermented cow milk from Baotou and Bayannur accounted for 28.7% and 44% of all isolates, respectively (Table 3). And the number of LAB in urum from Baotou and Bayannur accounted for 5.45% and 11.39% of all isolates, respectively, which showed that the same type of fermented dairy food produced in different regions had variable microbial diversity and composition. Nevertheless, the amount of LAB in huruud from these two regions showed no significant difference.

Quantification of Predominant LAB by q-PCR

The average quantities of Lb. plantarum, Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, Leu. mesenteroides of samples from Baotou were 5.26±0.9, 8.58±0.9, 4.43±1.01 (Log CFU/mL; mean±SD), respectively, whereas the quantities of samples from Bayannur were 6.17±1.32, 9.67±0.73, 4.92±0.86 (Log CFU/mL; mean±SD), accordingly. The bacterial amount of Lac. lactis subsp. lactis in Baotou samples was significantly lower (p<0.05) than that in Bayannur samples (Fig. 2A). The bacterial amount of Lb. plantarum in huruud was significantly lower (p<0.05) than that in fermented cow milk and urum (Fig. 2B). The quantities of Lac. lactis subsp. lactis was not significantly different between huruud and urum, however, that was significantly lower (p<0.05) than the quantities in fermented cow milk samples. The numbers of Leu. mesenteroides in fermented cow milk reached 5.47±0.41 (Log CFU/mL; mean±SD), which was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that in huruud and urum, representing 4.25±0.41and 3.51±0.36 (Log CFU/mL; mean±SD), respectively.

Fig. 2.(A) Box plots showing the enumeration of Lb. plantarum, Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, Leu. mesenteroides of traditional dairy products in Baotou (Bt-) and Bayannur (By-), (B) Box plots showing the enumeration of Lb. plantarum, Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, Leu. mesenteroides in fermented cow milk (F-), urum (U-) and huruud (H-). Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc. *Significant difference (p<0.05).

 

Discussion

The Mongolian ethnic group has developed and maintained their unique style fermented dairy products from one generation to the next. During the process of natural selection, good quality LAB strains have been reserved and handed down in these traditional fermented products. In recent years, more and more studies concerning the microbial composition and microorganism resources in traditional dairy products has been conducted. The conventional home-made dairy products such as fermented cow milk, huruud and urum play important roles in the Mongolian diet because of their nutritive value and economic value. However, the quality of these products is not homogenous and lack of quality standards. Thus, in order to preserve the dairy quality as well as to further expand the probiotic potential of these Mongolian style fermented products, it is of interest to study the microbial diversity of these products and to analyze isolated strains’ desirable properties.

The studied samples had a generally high LAB count (ranging from 6.74 to 9.15 CFU/mL) compared with some previous reports on other types of natural dairy foods (Liu et al. 2012; Watanabe et al. 2008). It may suggest that a high viability of LAB in the Mongolian styled products, which is an important requirement for further functional food development. Therefore, it may useful to further characterize the microbial diversity and composition of these conventional dairy products. A previous study (Watanabe et al., 2008) on the LAB diversity in 22 samples of airag and 31 samples of tarag of Mongolia showed that the identification of 367 isolates of LAB classified into 6 genera (including Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus and Streptococcus) and 19 species and subspecies by phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. Dewan and Tamang (2007) conducted a research on 58 samples of Himalayan ethnic fermented milk products and a total of 128 isolates of LAB were isolated and classified into 3 genera and 10 species and subspecies.

In this study, we revealed the LAB composition of conventional Mongolian dairy products by traditional culture method as well as 16S rRNA gene sequence-phylogenetic analysis and the results indicate the obvious difference in species diversity compared with previous studies (Dewan and Tamang 2007; Watanabe et al. 2008). These compositional differences are likely due to the types of dairy source, the process of dairy food production, sampling sites, environmental factors etc. A previous study (Zamfir et al., 2006) on the LAB diversity in sour cream of Romanian found that the predominant species were Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, Leu. mesenteroides, E. durans, E. faecium. Torres-Llanez et al. (2006) conducted a research on artisanal Mexican Fresco cheese, they concluded that the predominant LAB were Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, E. faecium and Lb. casei. Bulut et al. (2005) carried out a research on the traditional Comek peynr cheese from the Cappadocia region and reported E. faecium, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei as the prevalent bacteria.

In our study, the predominant LAB cultivated with MRS and M17 culture medium of fermented cow milk, huruud, and urum from midwestern Inner Mongolia were Lac. lactis subsp. lactis (65 isolates), Lb. plantarum (25 isolates), Leu. mesenteroides (23 isolates). All these results suggest that the genera of LAB species was finite, however, the species distribution and the quantity was various in dairy production. Also, the microbial composition is related to the fermentation time. Sakai et al. (2014) conducted a research on detecting the microbial community composition during production of Takanazuke and they found that the species, amount and the proportion of microflora changed during the fermentation process.

To obtain more accurate quantitative information of the dominant LAB, we utilized q-PCR method that is economical, easy to perform and provides more accurate quantitative data. The results indicate that the quantity of the same species varied greatly between sample types. This may suggest that the microbial difference was related to the unique household methods as well as the variation of the intrinsic starter composition. Even though no considerable difference was observed in the quantity of Lb. plantarum and Leu. mesenteroides in samples collected from both regions, significant variation was observed in the quantity of Lac. lactis subsp. lactis, with a much higher quantity in the samples from Bayannur compared to Baotou (Fig. 2A). Similarly, Yu et al. (2015) conducted a research on fermented dairy products of Russia by q-PCR analysis and found that the amounts of Lb. plantarum, Lb. helveticus, Lb. acidophilus were not significantly different, while the amounts of other species, namely Lb. delbrueckiii subsp. bulgaricus, Lb. fermentum, Lb. paracasei, were significantly different among three Russian cities. Although the sampling sites chosen in this study might geographically close, it already contribute to the difference in the microbial composition between similar sample types.

 

Conclusion

In this study, traditional culture method and 16S rRNA gene analysis as well as q-PCR were applied to analyze the diversity and composition of traditional dairy products (including fermented cow milk, huruud and urum) from Baotou and Bayannur, midwest of Inner Mongolia. A total of two hundred and two LAB isolates were identified and classified into twenty-one species and subspecies. Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides were considered as the predominated LAB species among these sixty-six samples under the condition of cultivating in MRS and M17 culture medium. Q-PCR were performed to quantify the dominant LAB and the result revealed that the number of predominant species varied from samples to samples and from region to region. This research contributes to an understanding of the composition and diversity of LAB in traditional dairy products of midwestern Inner Mongolia, which could provide some raw data and strain resources for further study involved in probiotics strain selection and starter culture design.

References

  1. Azadnia, P. and Khan Nazer, A. (2009) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional drinking yoghurt in tribes of Fars province. Iranian J. Vet. Res. 10, 235-240.
  2. Bao, Q., Liu, W., Yu, J., Wang, W., Qing, M., Chen, X., Wang, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., and Qiao, J. (2012a) Isolation and identification of cultivable lactic acid bacteria in traditional yak milk products of Gansu Province in China. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 58, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.58.95
  3. Bao, Q., Yu, J., Liu, W., Qing, M., Wang, W., Chen, X., Wang, F., Li, M., Wang, H., and Lv, Q. (2012b) Predominant lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented yak milk products in the Sichuan province of China. Dairy Sci. Technol. 92, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-012-0061-x
  4. Bulut, C., Gunes, H., Okuklu, B., Harsa, S., Kilic, S., Sevgi Coban, H., and Fazil Yenidunya, A. (2005) Homofermentative lactic acid bacteria of a traditional cheese, Comlek peyniri from Cappadocia region. J. Dairy Res. 72, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029904000536
  5. Chen, X., Du, X., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Sun, Z., Liu, W., Li, L., Sun, T., and Zhang, H. (2010) Isolation and identification of cultivable lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented milk of Tibet in China. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 63, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2010.00595.x
  6. Chen, Y., Liu, W., Xue, J., Yang, J., Chen, X., Shao, Y., Kwok, L. Y., Bilige, M., Mang, L., and Zhang, H. (2014) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus helveticus strains from traditional fermented dairy foods and antihypertensive effect of fermented milk of strain H9. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 6680-6692. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7962
  7. Dewan, S. and Tamang, J. P. (2007) Dominant lactic acid bacteria and their technological properties isolated from the Himalayan ethnic fermented milk products. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 92, 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-007-9163-5
  8. Gurses, M. and Erdogan, A. (2006) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tulum cheese during ripening period. Int. J. Food Prop. 9, 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910600596126
  9. Lick, S., Keller, M., Bockelmann, W., and Heller, K. (1996) Optimized DNA extraction method for starter cultures from yoghurt. Milchwissenschaft 51, 183-186.
  10. Liu, W., Bao, Q., Qing, M., Chen, X., Sun, T., Li, M., Zhang, J., Yu, J., Bilige, M., and Sun, T. (2012) Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from Tarag in eastern inner Mongolia of China by 16S rRNA sequences and DGGE analysis. Microbiol. Res. 167, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2011.05.001
  11. Liu, W., Sun, Z., Zhang, J., Gao, W., Wang, W., Wu, L., Sun, T., Chen, W., Liu, X., and Zhang, H. (2009) Analysis of microbial composition in acid whey for dairy fan making in Yunnan by conventional method and 16S rRNA sequencing. Curr. Microbiol. 59, 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9423-x
  12. Losio, M. N., Bozzo, G., Galuppini, E., Martella, V., Bertasi, B., Pavoni, E., and Finazzi, G. (2014) Silter cheese, a traditional Italian dairy product: A source of feasible probiotic strains. Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 492-498.
  13. Marco, M. and Kleerebezem, M. (2008) Assessment of realtime RT-PCR for quantification of Lactobacillus plantarum gene expression during stationary phase and nutrient starvation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 587-594.
  14. Mathara, J. M., Schillinger, U., Kutima, P. M., Mbugua, S. K., and Holzapfel, W. H. (2004) Isolation, identification and characterisation of the dominant microorganisms of kule naoto: The Maasai traditional fermented milk in Kenya. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 94, 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.008
  15. Olsen, K., Brockmann, E., and Molin, S. (2007) Quantification of Leuconostoc populations in mixed dairy starter cultures using fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103, 855-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03298.x
  16. Ouadghiri, M., Vancanneyt, M., Vandamme, P., Naser, S., Gevers, D., Lefebvre, K., Swings, J., and Amar, M. (2009) Identification of lactic acid bacteria in Moroccan raw milk and traditionally fermented skimmed milk 'lben'. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106, 486-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04016.x
  17. Passerini, D., Beltramo, C., Coddeville, M., Quentin, Y., Ritzenthaler, P., Daveran-Mingot, M.-L., and Le Bourgeois, P. (2010) Genes but not genomes reveal bacterial domestication of Lactococcus lactis. PLoS One 5, e15306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015306
  18. Rhee, S.J., Lee, J.-E., and Lee, C.-H. (2011) Importance of lactic acid bacteria in Asian fermented foods. Microb. Cell Fact. 10, S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S5
  19. Sakai, M., Ohta, H., Niidome, T., and Morimura, S. (2014) Changes in microbial community composition during production of Takanazuke. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 20, 693-698. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.20.693
  20. Sun, T., Zhao, S., Wang, H., Cai, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, H. (2009) ACE-inhibitory activity and gamma-aminobutyric acid content of fermented skim milk by Lactobacillus helveticus isolated from Xinjiang koumiss in China. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 228, 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0969-9
  21. Sun, Z., Liu, W., Gao, W., Yang, M., Zhang, J., Wu, L., Wang, J., Menghe, B., Sun, T., and Zhang, H. (2010) Identification and characterization of the dominant lactic acid bacteria from kurut: The naturally fermented yak milk in Qinghai, China. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 56, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.56.1
  22. Takeda, S., Fujimoto, R., Takenoyama, S., Takeshita, M., Kikuchi, Y., Tsend-Ayush, C., Dashnyam, B., Muguruma, M., and Kawahara, S. (2013) Application of probiotics from Mongolian dairy products to fermented dairy products and its effects on human defecation. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 19, 245-253. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.19.245
  23. Torres-Llanez, M., Vallejo-Cordoba, B., Díaz-Cinco, M., Mazorra-Manzano, M., and González-Córdova, A. (2006) Characterization of the natural microflora of artisanal Mexican Fresco cheese. Food Control 17, 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.04.004
  24. Wang, Z., Bao, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Yao, G., Wang, S., and Zhang, H. (2013) Effect of soymilk fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum P-8 on lipid metabolism and fecal microbiota in experimental hyperlipidemic rats. Food Biophys. 8, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-012-9282-z
  25. Watanabe, K., Fujimoto, J., Sasamoto, M., Dugersuren, J., Tumursuh, T., and Demberel, S. (2008) Diversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in Airag and Tarag, traditional fermented milk products of Mongolia. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9604-3
  26. Wu, R., Wang, W., Yu, D., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Sun, Z., Wu, J., Meng, H., and Zhang, H. (2009) Proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new probiotic bacterium isolated from traditional home-made koumiss in Inner Mongolia of China. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2321-2338. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M800483-MCP200
  27. Xu, H., Liu, W., Gesudu, Q., Sun, Z., Zhang, J., Guo, Z., Zheng, Y., Hou, Q., Yu, J., and Qing, Y. (2014) Assessment of the bacterial and fungal diversity in home-made yoghurts of Xinjiang, China by pyrosequencing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95, 2007-2015.
  28. Yu, J., Wang, H., Zha, M., Qing, Y., Bai, N., Ren, Y., Xi, X., Liu, W., Menghe, B., and Zhang, H. (2015) Molecular identification and quantification of lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented dairy foods of Russia. J. Dairy Sci. (in press).
  29. Yu, J., Wang, W., Menghe, B., Jiri, M., Wang, H., Liu, W., Bao, Q., Lu, Q., Zhang, J., and Wang, F. (2011) Diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated with traditional fermented dairy products in Mongolia. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 3229-3241. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3727
  30. Zamfir, M., Vancanneyt, M., Makras, L., Vaningelgem, F., Lefebvre, K., Pot, B., Swings, J., and De Vuyst, L. (2006) Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in Romanian dairy products. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2005.10.002

Cited by

  1. Phenotype and genotype of  lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from the tiger grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus alimentary tract vol.6, pp.2046-1402, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12734.1
  2. Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented milk products in Xinjiang, China vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/08905436.2019.1574230
  3. Investigating the bacterial microbiota of traditional fermented dairy products using propidium monoazide with single-molecule real-time sequencing vol.102, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15756
  4. Newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from silage targeting biofilms of foodborne pathogens during milk fermentation vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1618-0
  5. Construction of a shuttle expression vector for lactic acid bacteria vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-019-0013-4
  6. Fermented Seeds (“Zgougou”) from Aleppo Pine as a Novel Source of Potentially Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria vol.7, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120709
  7. Optimization of the Production of ε -Poly-L-Lysine by Novel Producer Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Traditional Dairy Products vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2145656
  8. A high-throughput system for screening high diacetyl-producing lactic acid bacteria in fermented milk in 96-well microplates vol.14, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00321-2
  9. Evaluation of the probiotic attributes of Bacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented African locust bean seeds (Parkia biglobosa), “daddawa” vol.70, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01564-x
  10. Determination of bacteriocin-encoding genes of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional dairy products of Luxor province, Egypt vol.6, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-020-00031-3
  11. Screening of Antimicrobial and Adhesive Activity of Lactobacilli Isolated from the National Food Products from Different Districts of the Karaganda Region (Kazakhstan) vol.9, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7053
  12. High throughput screening of technological and biopreservation traits of a large set of wild lactic acid bacteria from Brazilian artisanal cheeses vol.100, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103872
  13. Enhancement of the antibacterial potential of plantaricin by incorporation into silver nanoparticles vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00093-z
  14. Optimization of lactic acid production from agro-industrial wastes produced by Kosakonia cowanii vol.5, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100228