한국초지조사료학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.150-158
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2287-5824(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5832(eISSN)
한국초지조사료학회 (The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Teosinte (Zea mays ssp. mexicana) 신품종 극동 6호에 관한 생육특성, 수량성 및 사료가치

Growth Characteristics, Yield and Nutritive Values of New Teosinte, 'Geukdong 6'

  • Cui, Yong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Moo (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.12
  • 심사 : 2016.06.06
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 최근 개발되어 국내에 보급하고 있는 Teosinte 품종인 극동 6호의 생육특성, 수량성 및 사료가치를 평가하여, Teosinte 신품종 재배 및 이용을 위한 기초자료로 활용하고자 실시하였다. 실험설계는 옥수수(T1)와 수수${\times}$수단그라스 교잡종(T2)을 대조구로 하고 Teosinte 신품종인 극동 6호(T3)를 처리구로 한, 3처리 3반복 난괴법으로 배치하여 실시하였다. 초장은 T2구가 가장 높게 나타났으며(p<0.05), 엽폭, 엽수, 경의 굵기, 경경도, 건물수량은 T1구가 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05), 그리고 엽장, 분얼수, 생초수량은 T3구가 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 조단백질과 조회분은 T3구가 가장 높게 나타났으며(p<0.05), 조지방은 T1구가 가장 높았으며(p<0.05), ADF와 NDF에서는 T2구가 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). Brix degree를 비롯하여 Fructose, Glucose, Dextran, Isomerose, Inverted sugar와 같은 당 종류별 함량에 있어서는 T2 > T3 > T1구 순으로 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 총 무기물 함량은 T3 > T2 > T1구 순으로 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 사일리지에 있어서 pH는 T1구가 3.82로 가장 높았으며 lactate 함량은 T3 > T2 > T1구 순으로 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 청예작물에 대한 기호성은 한우에서는 T1 > T3 > T2구 순으로 나타났고, 꽃사슴에서는 T3 > T1 > T2구 순으로 나타났으며 재래염소에서는 T1 > T2 > T3구 순으로 높게 나타났다. 그러고 사일리지를 제조하여 급여시 기호성을 보게 되면 한우, 꽃사슴, 재래염소에서 T1 > T3 > T2구 순으로 높게 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 볼 때 Teosinte 신품종인 극동 6호는 대조 작물에 비하여 경이 부드럽고, 엽수가 많아 단백질 함량이 높았지만, 기호성은 사일리지용 옥수수 보다는 떨어지고, 수수${\times}$수단그라스 교잡종 보다는 높은 특징을 가지고 있다. 특히 높은 수분함량으로 인하여 건물수량은 적지만 생초 수량이 높아 청예용으로 유리한 작물로 생각 된다. 그러나 Teosinte 신품종인 극동 6호에 대한 파종시기, 재식밀도, 비료량 및 수확시기 등에 체계적인 재배 방법에 대한 규명이 이루어진 후 Teosinte 신품종인 극동 6호에 대한 정확한 평가가 이루어지는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

This study was conducted to evaluate growth characteristics, yield and feed value of newly developed domestic teosinte (Geukdong 6) compared to widely cultivated silage corn hybrid (31N27) and sorghum ${\times}$ sudangrass hybrid (P877F). Geukdong 6, a new single cross (Teosinte ${\times}$ Suwon 19) variety, is a teosinte (Zea may L. ssp. maxicana) developed by the Geukdong 6 of agricultural company corporation (GACC) in An-dong province. This field experiment was designed in a randomized block design with three replications and consisted of silage corn (T1), sorghum x sudangrass hybrid (T2) and Geukdong 6 (T3). Leaf length, number of leaves, number of tillers and fresh yield of T3 were higher than that of T1 and T2 (p<0.05). Dry matter yield of T3 was lower than that of T1 (p<0.05). In particular, T3 ($0.1kg/cm^2$) showed to be very tender compared to other T1 ($0.5kg/cm^2$) and T2 ($0.5kg/cm^2$), (p<0.05). The crude protein content of T3 as 8.25% was higher than that of T2 (5.90%), (p<0.05). However, there was no significant differences between T1 (8.14%). The brix degree of T2 was higher than that of T1 and T3 (p<0.05). T3 showed higher content of total minerals compared to T1 and T2 (p<0.05). The relative palatability of T3 was higher than T1 and T2 (p<0.05), when fed to deer as soiling crop. However, it showed a lower than T1 in Korean native cattle and korean native goats. The relative palatability of the silage shown in order of T1> T3> T2 in korean native cattle, spotted deer, and korean native goats. As mentioned above the results, Geukdong 6 (T3) could be recommended as using of soiling and lab silage, when high fresh yield, tender stem, number of many leaf, content of high crude protein, and palatability higher than sorghum ${\times}$ sudangrass hybrid were considered.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of analysis. 16th ed. Association of analytical chemist, Washington, DC., USA.
  2. Buchanan-Smith, J.G. 1990. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Science. 50:253-260.
  3. Doebley, J. 2004. The Genetics of maize evolution. Annual Reviews Genetics. 38:37-59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425
  4. Edwards, R.A., Donaldson, E. and MacGregor, A.W. 1967. Ensilage of whole crop barley. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 19:656.
  5. Gangstadt, E.O. 1964. Physical and chemical composition of grass sorghum as related to palatability Crop Science. 4:269-273. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400030009x
  6. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture. handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington DC.
  7. Hwang, K.J., Park, H.S., Park, N.G., Jeong, H.Y., Ko, M.S., Kim, M.C., Song, S.T. and Kim, D.W. 2009. Effect of cattle manure application on mineral contents of grazing pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 29(1):37-42. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.037
  8. Jeon, B.T., Moon, S.H. and Lee, S.M. 2012. A comparative studies on the growth characteristics and feed components of sorghum X sudangrass hybrids at paddy field cultivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.29
  9. Ji, H.C., Kim, M.J., Lee, S.H., Choi, G.J., Kim, K.Y., Park, H.S. and Kim, W.H. 2012. Agronomic characteristics and yield of silage corn hybrids 'cap 444NG'. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(1):9-14. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.9
  10. Ji, H.C., Lee, J.K., Kim, K.Y., Yoon, S.H., Lim, Y.C., Kwon, O.D. and Lee, H.B. 2009. Evaluation of agronomic characteristics, forage production and quality of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field in southern region of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 29(1):13-18. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.013
  11. Ji, H.C., Lee, S.H., Yoon, S.H., Kwon, O.D., Choi, G.J., Kim, W.H., Kim, K.Y. and Lim, Y.C. 2010. Growth, forage production and quality of sorghum, Sorghum X Sudangrass and Sudangrass hybrids at paddy field in southern region of Korea. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 30(2):109-114. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.2.109
  12. Jorgensen, N.A. and Crowley., J.W. 1972. Corn silage for wisconsin cattle. Coop. Extension Programs. Bull. A1178. pp 6-7.
  13. Kim, W.S., Hwang, J.H., Lee, J.H., Kim, E.J., Jeon, B.T., Moon, S.H. and Lee, S.M. 2012. A comparative study on the growth characteristics and nutritional components of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field cultivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(1):15-18. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.15
  14. Ko, Y.D. 1969. A study on the starch pulp silage 1. A study on the potato starch pulp silage. Chinju National Agricultural Collage. 11:180.
  15. Lee, J.K., Kim, J.G., Shin, D.E., Yoon, S.H., Kim, W.H., Seo, S. and Park, G.J. 2000. Effects of cutting frequency on yield and nutritive value between heading and headless varieties of sorghum X sudangrass hybrid. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 20(4):237-242.
  16. Lee, S.M. 2005. Effect of the cultivation method and cutting time on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and voluntary intake in Sorghum x Sudangrass hybrid. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 25(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2005.25.1.007
  17. Lee, S.M. and Lee, J.H. 2010. Effects of seeding dates and growth periods on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and feed value of corn for silage in paddy field. Korean Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 52(5):441-448. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2010.52.5.441
  18. Lee S.M., Kim, B.T., Hwang, J.H., Jeon, B.T. and Moon, S.H. 2007. Effect of plowing frequency and sowing dates on the agronomic characteristics, feed value, weed yield and palatability of silage corn. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 27(3):209-218. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.3.209
  19. Lee S.M., Moon, S.H. and Jeon, B.T. 1996. Effect of mixed- culture soil on growth characteristics and nutrient yield or silage corn. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 16(4):283-290.
  20. Lee, S.S., Yun, S.H., Seo, J.M., Yang, S.K., Kim, H.K., Ryu, S.H., Park, J.Y. and Kim, S.K. 2004. Silage productivity of Korean improved and introduced maize hybrids. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 24(4):323-334. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.4.323
  21. Park, N.B., Kwack, C.H. and Ko, Y.D. 1984. Effect of formic acid addition on the quality of barley silage in accordance with growth stage. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 4(3): 214-219.
  22. Rabas, D.L., Schmid, A.R. and Mertc. 1970. Influence of temperature on the feeding growth carbohydrate composition of three alfalfa cultivars. Agronomy Journal. 62:762. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060023x
  23. SAS. 2002. SAS user's guide; Statistics. SAS Inst. Inc. NC.
  24. Seo, S. and Kim, D.A. 1984. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cutting management on the carbohydrate reserves, regrowth, and dry matter yield of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid[sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] for forage production. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 3(2):58-66.
  25. Smith, A.E. 1972. A method for quantifying carbohydrate fraction in forage plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 20: 238-239. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60180a009
  26. Son, B.Y., Baek, S.B., Kim, J.T., Lee, J.S., Hwang, J.J., Kwon, Y.U., Ji, H.J., Huh, C.S. and Park, J.Y. 2012. A now silage cross maize hybrid for grain and silage, 'Pyeongangok'. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(3):203-208. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.3.203
  27. Son, B.Y., Baek, S.B., Kim, J.T., Lee, J.S., Kim, W.H., Roh, J.H., Kim, S.L., Jung, G.H., Kwon, Y.U., Ji, H.J., Huh, C.S. and Park, J.Y. 2014. A new single cross maize hybrid for silage and grain, 'Cheongdaok' with lodging tolerance. Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 46(2):172-177. https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.2.172
  28. Son, B.Y., Kim, J.T., Song, S.Y., Baek, S.B., Kim, C.K. and Kim, J.D. 2009. Comparison of yield and forage quality of silage corns at different planting dates. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 29(3):179-186. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.3.179
  29. Son, B.Y., Moon, H.G., Jung, T.W., Kim, S.J. and Kim, J.D. 2006. Comparison of agronomic characteristics, yield and feed value of different corn hybrids for silage. Korean Journal of Crop Science. 51(3):233-238.
  30. Stoneberg, E.G., Schaller, F.W., Hull, D.O., Meyer, V.M., Wickersham, T., Geasler, M.R. and Nelson, D.K. 1974. Silage Production and use. Iowa State University. Ext. P. 417.
  31. Takano, N. and Yamashita, Y. 1970. Studies on the various affecting the qualities of grass silage. II. Effects of growth stage on the silage quality, digestibility and nutrients intake. Journal of the Japan Grassland Science. 16:22-28.
  32. Woolford, M.K. 1975. Microbiological screening of the straight chain fatty acids (C1-C12) as potential silage additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 26:219-228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740260213