Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Content Structure Focusing on Three Systems of Action for the 2009 Revised Current Home Economics Curriculum

2009 개정 현행 가정과 교육과정을 위한 세 행동체계 중심의 내용체계 개발

  • Ju, Sueun (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Dongkuk University) ;
  • Yoo, Taemyung (Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 주수언 (동국대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 유태명 (이화여자대학교 교육대학원 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2016.06.07
  • Accepted : 2016.06.22
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design curriculum content structure integrating three systems of actions for 2009 revised current home economics curriculum. For the development of content structure and content elements, a development team of two home economics scholars, a cooperating team of three home economics teachers, and an expert team of 15 home economics teachers and professors were organized. Phase 1 of curriculum development was developed by integrating three systems of actions with traditional home economics content areas of clothing, food, housing, consumption, and family by the development team. It is examined by the cooperating team and in phase 2 is recommended to build matrix of units of the current curriculum and the three systems of actions. The final phase of curriculum development illustrated a content structure integrating the sub-units of 2009 revised current curriculum and the three systems of action following the expert group's professional opinion.

본 연구는 2009 개정 현행 가정과 교육과정에서 실행할 수 있는 세 행동체계 중심의 교육과정 안을 개발하여 새로운 관점에서 큰 어려움 없이 개별 가정과 교사가 활용할 수 있도록 돕고자 하였다. 세 행동체계에 대한 본질적 이해는 2009 개정 현행 교육과정에서는 물론 2015 개정 교육과정의 실행에도 필수적으로 요구되는 부분이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2명의 개발진, 3명의 검토진, 15명의 전문가 협의진을 구성하고 3차안에 걸쳐 세 행동체계 중심 교육내용 체계를 개발하였다. 1차안은 의, 식, 주, 가족 아동, 소비 가정경역과 세 행동체계를, 2차안은 2009 개정 현행 가정과 교육과정의 중단원 수준에서 세 행동체계를, 최종안은 2009 개정 현행 가정과 교육과정의 소단원 수준에서 세 행동체계를 접목하여 내용체계를 개발하였다. 이 교육과정의 실행을 위한 지원체계를 모색하여 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, M. M. (1978). A conceptual scheme and decision-rules for the selection and organization of home economics curriculum content. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
  2. Brown, M. M. & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: A definition. Washington, DC : American Home Economics Association.
  3. Chae J-H (1996). Concerns of Home Economics Teachers on Ohio's Work and Family Life Curriculum. Family and Environment Research, 34(4), 327-343.
  4. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Translated by J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  5. Johnson, J. & Fedje, C. (1999). Family and Consumer Sciences curriculum: Toward a critical science approach. Education and Technology Division, American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences.
  6. Laster, J. F. & Thomas, R. G.(ed) (1997). Thinking for ethical action in families and communities. AAFCS.
  7. Laster, J. (2008). Nurturing critical literacy through practical problem solving. Journal of the Japan Association of Home Economics Education, 50(4), 1-12.
  8. Lee C-S, Choi Y-H & Yoo T-M (2002). A study on the systematization of objectives and contents of school 'practical arts' and 'technology & home economics'(1). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  9. Lee C., Wang S-S & Kim M. (2004). Analysis and Evaluation of the Content Relevance in Practical Arts(Technology･ Home Economics) Subject. Korean Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  10. Lee H-J & Cho J-S (2005). Importance of objectives of housing unit in Home Economics by three systems of action of Home Economics teachers in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(4), 117-131.
  11. Lee K., Jin E., Kim K., Chae J-H, You J., & Kim S. (2010). A study on the curriculum improvements by subject in the revised national curriculum of 2009. Korean Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  12. Lee Y-S (2005). 교육과정 개정을 위한 가정교과의 대안적 모형. Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference.(pp.75-93).
  13. Maryland Department of Education (2007). Maryland Family and Consumer Science Voluntary State Curriculum. http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/NR/rdonlyres/CBD7EC17-9343-43BD-B168-00DEF57A7A6E/20361/FACS_VSC_Chart_060707.pdf.
  14. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Science (2008). National Standard for Family and Consumer Sciences Education. http://www.nasafacs.org/national-standards-and-competencies.html
  15. NCIC (2016). http://ncic.kice.re.kr/ Retrieved on May 30, 2016.
  16. Ohio Department of Education (1994). Work and family life curriculum guide. Columbus, Ohio.
  17. Oh Y-H & Chae J-H (2005). Middle school Home Economics teachers' family value and needs on learning objectives of family life area according to the three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(2), 239-255.
  18. Robert, D. (1980). Theory, curriculum development and unique events of practice. In H. Munby and G. Orpwood, & T. Russel. (eds.). Seeing curriculum in a new light: Essays from Science Education. 65-87 Toronto: OISE Press.
  19. Ryu S-H (2000). A study on the relationship between curriculum orientation and professional teaching practice of home economics teachers. Family and Environment Research, 38(8), 159-168.
  20. Ryu H-R, Chong Y-S, & Chae J-H (1997). A study of needs perception toward the educational purposes of Home Economics subject in middle school. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 6(1), 111-127.
  21. Staaland, E. & Strom, S. (1996). Family, Food, and Society: A Teacher's Guide. Wisconsin Department of Consumer Sciences.
  22. Thomas, R. G., & Laster, J. F. (1998). Inquiry into thinking. Education and Technology Division, American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences.
  23. Yang J-S (2016). The Ideal Portrait of Human Being Pursuing in Home Economics Education from a Critical Science Perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, Gyeongsang National University, Gyeong Nam, Korea.
  24. Yoo N-S & Kim Y-N (1997). Teachers' needs assessment of food/nutrition of secondary Home Economics education for three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 9(1), 83-94.
  25. Yoo T-M & Lee S-H (2010). Practical problem focused family & consumer sciences instruction-the theory & practice. Seoul : BookKorea.

Cited by

  1. Habermas의 세 행동체계를 융합한 초·중·고등학교 가정교과 식생활 교육과정 개발 vol.32, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.117