한국수정란이식학회지 (Journal of Embryo Transfer)

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.117-121
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2508-755X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0178(eISSN)
한국수정란이식학회 (The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of a short-term in vitro exposure time on the production of in vitro produced piglets

  • Hwang, In-Sul (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwon, Dae-Jin (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwak, Tae-Uk (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Young (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hyung, Nam-Woong (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yang, Hyeon (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Oh, Keon Bong (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ock, Sun-A (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Eung-Woo (Animal Genetics and Bioinformatics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Im, Gi-Sun (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hwang, Seongsoo (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.12
  • 심사 : 2016.06.24
  • 발행 : 2016.07.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although piglets have been delivered by embryo transfer (ET) with in vitro produced (IVP) embryos and blastocysts, a success rate has still remained lower level. Unlike mouse, human, and bovine, it is difficult to a production of piglets by in vitro fertilization (IVF) because of an inappropriate in vitro culture (IVC) system in pig. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate whether minimized exposure time in IVC can improve the pregnancy and delivery rates of piglets. Immediately after IVM, the oocytes were denuded and co-incubated with freshly ejaculated boar semen for 3.5 to 4 hours at $38.5^{\circ}C$ under 5% $CO_2$ in air. To avoid long-term exposure to in vitro state, we emitted IVC step after IVF. After that the presumptive zygotes were transferred into both oviducts of the surrogate on the same day or 1 day after the onset of estrus. Pregnancy was diagnosed on day 28 after ET and then was checked regularly every month by ultrasound examination. The 3 out of 4 surrogates were determined as pregnant (75%) and a total of 5 piglets (2 females and 3 males) were delivered at $118.3{\pm}2.5$ days of pregnancy period. In conclusion, a short-term exposure time may be an important factor in the production of IVP-derived piglets. It can be apply to the in vitro production system of transgenic pig by IVF, cloning, and pronuclear microinjection methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Cantley TC, Rieke A and Day BN. 1998. Coculture with follicular shell pieces can enhance the developmental competence of pig oocytes after in vitro fertilization: relevance to intracellular glutathione. Biol. Reprod. 58:213-218. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.213
  2. Ahn KS, Kim YJ, Kim M, Lee BH, Heo SY, Kang MJ, Kang YK, Lee JW, Lee KK, Kim JH, Nho WG, Hwang SS, Woo JS, Park JK, Park SB and Shim H. 2011. Resurrection of an alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-targeted miniature pig by recloning using postmortem ear skin fibroblasts. Theriogenology 75:933-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.11.001
  3. Bavister BD. 1995. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum. Reprod. Update 1:91-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/1.2.91
  4. Chen Z, Hagen DE, Elsik CG, Ji T, Morris CJ, Moon LE and Rivera RM. 2015. Characterization of global loss of imprinting in fetal overgrowth syndrome induced by assisted reproduction. PNAS, USA. 112:4618-4623. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422088112
  5. Chen Z, Robbins KM, Wells KD and Rivera RM. 2013. Large offpring syndrome a bovine model for the human loss-of-imprinting overgrowth syndrome Beckwith-Wiedemann. Epigenetics 8:591-601. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.24655
  6. Dobrinsky JR, Johnson LA and Rath D. 1996. Development of a culture medium (BECM-3) for porcine embryos: effects of bovine serum albumin and fetal bovine serum on embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 55:1069-1074. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.5.1069
  7. Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Moreira P, Bilbao A, Jimenez A, Perez-Crespo M, Ramirez MA, Rodriguez De Fonseca F, Pintado B and Gutierrez-Adan A. 2004. Long-term effect of in vitro culture of mouse embryos with serum on mRNA expression of imprinting genes, development, and behavior. PNAS, USA. 101:5880-5885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308560101
  8. Georgiou AS, Gil MA, Alminana C, Cuello C, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Martinez EA and Fazeli A. 2011. Effects of complement component 3 derivatives on pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 46:1017-1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01777.x
  9. Hidenobu S and Ken H. Epigenetic and genetic alterations of the imprinting disorder Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and related disorders. J. Hum. Genet. 2013. 58:402-409. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2013.51
  10. Hwang IS, Kim SW, Byun SJ, Kim KW, Chung HK, Park JJ, Gobianand K, Park JK and Yoo JG. 2012. The effect of horse serum on in vitro development of porcine parthenogenetic embryos. Reprod. Biol. 12:25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60075-8
  11. Hwang IS, Kwon DJ, Kwak TU, Lee JW, Im GS and Hwang S. 2016. Improved survival and developmental rates in vitrified-warmed pig oocytes after recovery culture with coenzyme Q10. Cryo Letters 37:59-67.
  12. Hwang S, Oh KB, Kwon DJ, Ock SA, Lee JW, Im GS, Lee SS, Lee K and Park JK. 2013. Improvement of cloning efficiency in minipigs using post-thawed donor cells treated with roscovitine. Mol. Biotechnol. 55:212-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9671-7
  13. Kikuchi K, Nagai T, Motlik J, Shioya Y and Izaike Y. 1993. Effect of follicle cells on in vitro fertilization of pig follicular oocytes. Theriogenology 39:593-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90246-2
  14. Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi N, Kaneko H, Akita T and Nagai T. 2002. Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol. Reprod. 66:1033-1041. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.4.1033
  15. Kobayashi M, Asakuma S, and Fukui Y. 2007. Blastocyst production by in vitro maturation and development of porcine oocytes in defined media following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote 15:93-102 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199406004035
  16. Koo DB, Kim YJ, Yu I, Kim HN, Lee KK and Han YM. 2005. Effects of in vitro fertilization conditions on preimplantation development and quality of pig embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 90:101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.005
  17. Lee HG, Lee HC, Chung HJ, Hwang IS, Choi MS, Byun SJ, Lee S, Kim MJ, Woo JS, Chang WK, Lee P, Lee HT and Park JK. 2008. Study on the reproductive function in transgenic pig harboring human erythropoietin (hEPO) gene. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 32:117-121.
  18. Lee HG, Lee HC, Kim SW, Lee P, Chung HJ, Lee YK, Han JH, Hwang IS, Yoo JI, Kim YK, Kim HT, Lee HT, Chang WK and Park JK. 2009. Production of recombinant human von Willebrand factor in the milk of transgenic pigs. J. Reprod. Dev. 55:484-490. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.20212
  19. Lee J, Hyun SH and Lee E. 2012. A comparative study on the parthenogenetic development of pig oocytes cultured in north carolina state university-23 and porcine zygote medium-3. J. Emb. Trans. 27:121-126.
  20. McEvoy TG. 2003. Manipulation of domestic animal embryos and implications for development. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 38:268-275. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00443.x
  21. Misumi K, Hirayama Y, Suzuki M, Nakai M, Kaneko H, Noguchi J and Kikuchi K. 2014. Production of middle white piglets after transfer of embryos produced in vitro. J. Reprod. Dev. 60:246-249. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2013-088
  22. Moon HJ, Shim JH, Hwang IS, Park MR, Kim DH, Ko YG, Park CK, Im GS. 2009. Effect of FBS (fetal bovine serum) and pFF(porcine follicular fluid) on in vitro maturation development of porcine parthenogenetic and nuclear transfer embryos. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 33:85-91.
  23. Park HD, Zhu YC and Park YS. 2014. Effects of vitamin k1 on the developmental and survival rate of porcine in vitro fertilized embryos. J. Emb. Trans. 29:73-81. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.1.73
  24. Park JK, Lee YK, Lee P, Chung HJ, Kim S, Lee HG, Seo MK, Han JH, Park CG, Kim HT, Kim YK, Min KS, Kim JH, Lee HT and Chang WK. 2006. Recombinant human erythropoietin produced in milk of transgenic pigs. J. Biotechnology 122:362-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.021
  25. Petters RM and Wells KD. 1993. Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. (Suppl) 48:61-73.
  26. Shim JH, Park MR, Yang BC, Ko YG, Oh KB, Lee JW, Woo JS, Park EW, Park SB, and Hwang S. 2009. Developmental characteristics of SCNT pig embryos knocked-out of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 33:157-162.
  27. Walker SK, Hartwich KM and Seamark RF. 1996. The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: Concepts and challenges. Theriogenology 45:111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00360-K
  28. Wright RW Jr. 1977. Successful culture in vitro of swine embryos to the blastocyst stage. J. Anim. Sci. 44:854-858. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.445854x
  29. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM and Iwamura S. 2002. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66:112-119. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112