대한정형도수물리치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.35-41
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-3680(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-7282(eISSN)
대한정형도수물리치료학회 (Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)
권호 표지

수정된 리버스 식스 테이핑 적용이 편평족의 균형과 보행에 미치는 영향 - 사전연구

The Effect of Modified Reverse-Six Taping on the Balance and Gait Performance in Pes Planus - Pilot study

  • Yang, Seong-hwa (Dept. of physical Therapy, Kyung-in Medical Rehabilitation Center) ;
  • Shin, Young-il (Dept. of physical Therapy, Korea National College of Welfare) ;
  • Lee, Jun-young (Dept. of physical Therapy, Seoul North Municipal Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.04.06
  • 심사 : 2016.06.14
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of modified reverse-six taping on the balance and gait performance in Pes Planus. Methods: A total of twelve subjects (4 males, 8 females) in Pes Planus participated in this study. Navicular drop test was used to evaluate Pes Planus. Balance performance(anterior-posterior; A-P, medial-lateral; M-L), overall) was evaluated using the Biodex balance system in two difference condition(no-taping, with reverse-six taping). Gait performance (cadence, velocity) was evaluated using GAITRite System in two difference condition (no-taping, with reverse-six taping). Results: There were significant improvements of A-P and overall in the balance performance after using reverse-six taping (p<.05). there was no significant improvements of M-L balance performance. and, there were no statistical difference of cadence and velocity in the gait performance after using reverse-six taping. Conclusions: This study found that modified reverse-six taping in Pes Planus was improve the balance performance. but dose not affect the gait performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 대한정형외과학회. 정형외과학(7판). 최신의학사. 2013.
  2. 민경기, 박광용, 박승환. 편평족의 환자 맞춤형 인솔 보조기가 양발속도에 미치는 영향. 재활복지공학회논문지. 2009;2(1):19-25.
  3. 박광용. 기능성 발보조기 착용 전 후 시상면의 발목각도 변화에 관한 연구. 경기대학교 대체의학대학원, 석사학위논문. 2008.
  4. 박승범, 박재영, 김경훈. 정상족과 편평족의 Arch Support 사용에 따른 운동역학적 분석. 한국 운동역학학회지. 2010;20(1):91-99.
  5. 박정주, 김예은, 조은진. 편평족에서 트레드밀 보행동안 전경골근과 장비골근의 근전도 활동에 대한 세반회내 테이핑 방법들 간 비교. 한국신경재활학회지. 2012;2(1):31-37.
  6. 서태수. 청년층의 편평족 실태 조사. 대한물리치료학회지. 1997;9(1):97-101.
  7. 엄주리, 문동철, 김종순. 유연성 평발에 적용한 로우-다이 테이핑에 의한 균형 수행력의 변화. 대한물리의학회지. 2014;9(4):355-361. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2014.9.4.355
  8. 이정훈. 테이핑 적용 양식이 근력, 근지구력 및 유연성에 미치는 영향. 남부대학교, 석사학위논문. 2006.
  9. 채석우, 박광용, 김영서. 기능성 발보조기의 족부형태별 균형유지에 미치는 영향. 재활복지공학회논문지. 2011;5(1):47-52.
  10. Brody DM. Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982;13:541-558
  11. Cheung RT, Chung RC, Ng GY. Efficacies of different external controls for excessive foot pronation: A meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(9):743-751. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.079780
  12. Cornwall MW, Lebec M, DeGeyter J, et al. The reliability of the modified reverse-6 taping procedure with elastic tape to alter the height and width of the medial longitudinal arch. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(4):381-392.
  13. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG, Fair A. The effect of exercise and time on the height and width of the medial longitudinal arch following the modified reverse-6 and the modified augmented low-dye taping procedures. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(5):635-643.
  14. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM. Effects of Pronated and Supinated Foot Postures on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41-46.
  15. Delahunt E, O'Driscoll J, Moran K. Effects of taping and exercise on ankle joint movement in subjects with chronic ankle instability: a preliminary investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1418-1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.024
  16. Franettovich M, Chapman A, Vicenzino B. Tape that increases medial longitudinal arch height also reduces leg muscle activity: A preliminary study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):593-600. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318162134f
  17. Franettovich M, Chapman AR, Blanch P, et al. Augmented low-Dye tape alters foot mobility and neuromotor control of gait in individuals with and without exercise related leg pain. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3(1)5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-5
  18. Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in standing position. Gait Posture. 2007;25(1):127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.005
  19. Loudon JK, Jenkis W, Loudon KL. The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(2):91-97. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.24.2.91
  20. Meier K, Mcpoil TG, Cornwall MW, et al. Use of antipronation taping to determine foot orthoses prescription: A case series. Research in Sports Medicine. 2008;16(257):257-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620802310842
  21. Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop. 2010;4:107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0239-9
  22. Mulligan EP, Cook PG. Effect of plantar intrinsic muscle training on medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic function. Man Ther. 2013;18(5):425-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.02.007
  23. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;26(2):35
  24. Neumann A Donald. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System, Functional for Physical Rehabilitation 2nd. 2009.
  25. Pereira HM, de Campos TF, Santos MB, et al. Influence of knee position on the postural stability index registered by the Biodex Stability System. Gait Posture. 2008;28(4):668-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.003
  26. Smith M, Brooker S, Vicenzino B, et al. Use of anti- pronation taping to assess suitability of orthotic prescription: case report. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(2):111-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60103-3
  27. Takata Y, Matsuoka S, Okumura N, et al. Standing balance on the ground -the influence of flatfeet and insoles. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(12):1519-1521. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1519
  28. Tudor A, Ruzic L, Sestan B, et al. Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):e386-392. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2262
  29. Van Uden CJ, Besser MP. Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-13
  30. Vicenzino B, Feilding J, Howard R, et al. An investigation of the anti-pronation effect of two taping methods after application and exercise. Gait Posture. 1997;5(1):1-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(95)01061-0
  31. Vicenzino B, Franettovich M, McPoil T, et al. Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running. Br J Sprots Med. 2005;39(12):939-943 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.019158
  32. Vicenzino B, McPoil T, Russel T, et al. Anti-pronation tape changes foot posture but not plantar ground contact during gait. The Foot. 2006;16(2):91-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2006.02.005
  33. Wang WJ, Crompton RH. Analysis of the human and ape foot during bipedal standing with implications for the evolution of the foot. J Biomech. 2004;37(12):1831-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.036