DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cone penetrometer incorporated with dynamic cone penetration method for investigation of track substructures

  • Hong, Won-Taek (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Byun, Yong-Hoon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Kim, Sang Yeob (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Sub (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2015.07.13
  • Accepted : 2016.02.17
  • Published : 2016.08.25

Abstract

The increased speed of a train causes increased loads that act on the track substructures. To ensure the safety of the track substructures, proper maintenance and repair are necessary based on an accurate characterization of strength and stiffness. The objective of this study is to develop and apply a cone penetrometer incorporated with the dynamic cone penetration method (CPD) for investigating track substructures. The CPD consists of an outer rod for dynamic penetration in the ballast layer and an inner rod with load cells for static penetration in the subgrade. Additionally, an energy-monitoring module composed of strain gauges and an accelerometer is connected to the head of the outer rod to measure the dynamic responses during the dynamic penetration. Moreover, eight strain gauges are installed in the load cells for static penetration to measure the cone tip resistance and the friction resistance during static penetration. To investigate the applicability of the developed CPD, laboratory and field tests are performed. The results of the CPD tests, i.e., profiles of the corrected dynamic cone penetration index (CDI), profiles of the cone tip and friction resistances, and the friction ratio are obtained at high resolution. Moreover, the maximum shear modulus of the subgrade is estimated using the relationships between the static penetration resistances and the maximum shear modulus obtained from the laboratory tests. This study suggests that the CPD test may be a useful method for the characterization of track substructures.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References

  1. Al-Qadi, I.L., Xie, W., Roberts, R. and Leng, Z. (2010), "Data analysis techniques for GPR used for assessing railroad ballast in high radio-frequency environment", J. Transportation Eng. - ASCE, 136(4), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000088
  2. Anbazhagan, P., Lijun, S., Buddihima, I. and Cholachat, R. (2011), "Model track studies on fouled ballast using ground penetrating radar and multichannel analysis of surface wave", J. Appl. Geophys., 74, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.05.002
  3. ASTM D4633 (2005), "Standard test method for energy measurement for dynamic penetrometers", Annual Book of ASTM Standard, 04.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  4. ASTM D6951 (2009), "Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications", Annual Book of ASTM Standard, 04.03, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  5. Bemben, S.M. and Myers, H.J. (1974), "The influence of rate of penetration on static cone resistance in connecticut river valley varved clay", Proceedings of the European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm, 33-34.
  6. Byun, Y.H., Kim, J.H. and Lee, J.S. (2013), "Cone penetrometer with a helical-type outer screw rod for evaluation of the subgrade condition", J. Transportation Eng. - ASCE, 139, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000504
  7. Carpenter, D., Jackson, P.J. and Jay, A. (2004), "Enhancement of the GPR method of railway trackbed investigation by the installation of radar detectable geosynthetics", NDT & E Int., 37, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.06.003
  8. Chebli, H., Clouteau, D. and Schmitt, L. (2008), "Dynamic response of high-speed ballasted railway tracks: 3D periodic model and in situ measurements", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28, 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.05.007
  9. Cho, G.C., Lee, J.S. and Santamarina, J.C. (2004), "Spatial variability in soils: High resolution assessment with electrical needle probe", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 130(8), 843-850. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(843)
  10. Clark, M., McCann, D.M. and Forde, M.C. (2002), "Infrared thermographic investigation of railway track ballast", NDT & E Int., 35, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(01)00032-9
  11. Correia, A.G., Martins, J., Caldeira, L., Neves, D., Maranha, E. and Delgado, J. (2009), "Comparison of in situ performance-based tests methods to evaluate moduli of railway embankments", In Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields. 8th International Conference, IL, 1331-1340.
  12. De Lima, D.C. and Tumay, M.T. (1991), "Scale effects in cone penetration tests", Proceedings of the Geotechnical Engineering Congress, Boulder, Colorado.
  13. Gallagher, G.P., Leiper, Q., Wiliamson, R., Clark, M.R. and Forde, M.C. (1999), "The application of time domain ground penetrating radar to evaluate railway track ballast", NDT & E Int., 32, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00025-0
  14. Hugenschmidt, J. (2000), "Railway track inspection using GPR", J. Appl. Geophys., 43, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00054-3
  15. Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R. and Lee, W. (2008), "Effect of Penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in saturated clayey soils", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 134(8), 1142-1153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1142)
  16. Kim, R., Lee, W. and Lee, J.S. (2010), "Temperature-compensated cone penetration test mini-cone using fiber optic sensors", Geotech. Test. J., 33(3), 243-252.
  17. Lee, C., Lee, J.S., An, S. and Lee, W. (2010), "Effect of secondary impacts on SPT rod energy and sampler penetration", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 136(3), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000236
  18. Lee, J.S. and Santamarina, J.C. (2005), "Bender element: Performance and signal interpretation", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 131(9), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063)
  19. Lee, W., Shin, D.H., Yoon, H.K. and Lee, J.S. (2009), "Micro-cone penetrometer for more concise subsurface layer detection", Geotech. Testing Journal, ASTM, 32(4), 358-364.
  20. Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1997), Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 352.
  21. McHenry, M.T. and Rose, J.G. (2012), Railroad subgrade support and performance indicators: a review of available laboratory and in-situ testing methods, Department of Civil Engineering and Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, KY, 39.
  22. Pile Dynamics Inc. (2000), PDA-W Users manual, OH.
  23. Sancio, R.B. and Bray, J. (2005). "An assessment of the effect of rod length on SPT energy calculations based on measured field data", Geotech. Testing Journal, ASTM, 28(1), 1-9.
  24. Santamarina, J.C. and Fratta, D. (1998), Introduction to discrete signals and inverse problems in civil Engineering, ASCE Press, Virginia, 327.
  25. Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F. and Chung, R.M. (1985), "Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation", J. Geotech. Eng., 111(12), 1425-1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)
  26. Skempton, A.W. (1986), "Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation", Geotechnique, 36(3), 425-447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425
  27. Tumay, M.T., Kurup, P.U. and Boggess, R.L. (1998), "A continuous intrusion electronic miniature cone penetration test (CIM-CPT) system for site characterization", Proceedings of the International Conference on Site Characterization 98, Atlanta, GA.
  28. Vo, P.T., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Zhou, J.L., Listowski, A., Du, B., Wei, Q. and Bui, X. T. (2015), "Stormwater quality management in rail transportation - Past, present and future", Sci. Total Environ., 512-513, 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.072
  29. Yoon, H.K., Jung, S.H. and Lee, J.S. (2011), "Characterization of subsurface spatial variability by cone resistivity penetrometer", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(7), 1064-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.03.012
  30. Yoon, H.K. and Lee, J.S. (2012), "Microcones configured with full-bridge circuits", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 41, 119-127.

Cited by

  1. 크로스홀 형태의 동적 콘 관입기를 이용한 노반의 강성특성 평가 vol.34, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2018.34.2.55
  2. Assessing subgrade strength using an instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer vol.59, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.03.005