디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제14권6호
  • /
  • Pages.133-142
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

명품브랜드 위조품 태도의 영향요인에 관한 종합적 연구: 중국소비자를 중심으로

A Synthetic Study of Influential Factors on Attitudes toward the Counterfeit of Prestige Brand: Focused on Chinese Consumers

  • 오지원 (금오공대 컨설팅대학원) ;
  • 왕위 (금오공대 경영학과) ;
  • 김귀곤 (금오공대 경영학과)
  • Oh, Ji-Won (Graduate School of Consulting, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Wang, Wei (Dept. of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Gwi-Gon (of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.02
  • 심사 : 2016.06.20
  • 발행 : 2016.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 브랜드의 이미지 및 위조품의 진품과의 제품 유사성이 명품 위조품태도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보는 것이다. 특히 지각된 브랜드 글로벌성의 조절효과와 함께 진품에 대한 태도가 위조품 태도에 미치는 영향도 살펴보았다. 연구의 결과 첫째, 브랜드 이미지는 진품(위조품)태도 모두에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 상징적 브랜드 이미지가 진품(위조품)태도 모두에 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 둘째, 지각된 브랜드 글로벌성의 조절효과도 확인되었다. 즉 브랜드이미지가 진품태도에 미치는 영향은 지각된 브랜드 글로벌성에 따라 차이가 유의하지 않았지만, 위조품태도에 미치는 영향은 지각된 브랜드 글로벌성이 높은 경우에 더 선호되는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 위조품의 진품과의 제품유사성은 위조품태도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 지각된 품질유사성이 위조품태도에 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 진품태도는 위조품 태도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 연구결과는 진품과 위조품의 관계에서 상징적인 측면의 브랜드이미지와 기능적인 측면의 제품유사성이 위조품 태도에 미치는 영향을 종합적으로 이해하는데 이론적 기초를 제공할 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to test the effects of brand image and product similarity with the original on the attitude toward the counterfeit of prestige brand. Especially this study is focused on the moderating effect of perceived bland globalness (PBG) and the influence of the original attitude on the counterfeit one. The results of this study are as follows 1) brand image has a positive impact on the counterfeit attitude as well as the original one. And symbolic image is more positive than functional image on the both of them. 2)The moderating effect of PBG appeared between brand image and attitude. Namely, there is no statistical difference according to PBG in the effect of brand image on the original attitude. But the effect of brand image on the counterfeit attitude is higher in case of high PBG. 3) Product similarity of the counterfeit with the original has a positive impact on only the counterfeit attitude. And the similarity of perceived quality is more positive than appearance similarity on the counterfeit attitude. 4) The original attitude has a positive impact on the counterfeit one.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Narea, Kim,"The effect of brand concept and brand attachment on evaluating brand line extensions and parent brand". M.A. degree, Hanyang University. 2012.
  2. Hae Ryong Kim and Moon Kyu Lee & Na Min Kim, "Determinants and Consequences of the Brand Attachment", Journal of the korea Society of Consumer Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp45-65, 2005.
  3. Seung-Hwe Koo, "Consumer Propensity and Luxury Brands Counterfeit(fake) Purchased between Study on the Relationship : Focusing on the Moderating Role of Self-esteem", Journal of the korea Practical Science Forum of Advertising & Public Relations, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp85-107, 2011.
  4. Jung Hee, Park, "The Effect of Consumer Attitude towards the Counterfeit Brand om Attitude towards the Original Brand: Focused on Fashion Luxury. Unpublished master's thesis", Seoul National University. Seoul. 2004.
  5. Yong Seok Cheon and Jong Woo Jun, "Strategic Effects of Global Brand Positioning on Brand Perceptions and Purchase Intentions A Focus on Consumers of the Brand Origin Country" The Korean journal of advertising and public relations, Vol. -, No. 92, 2012.
  6. Rha JY, Rhee KC, Yeo JS, Kim RD, Jun SM, "Counterfeit consumption in Korea: Who buys what, and why?" J Consumer Stud Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.273-298, 2010.
  7. Hye Jung,Park, and Kyung sook Jeon, "Purchasing Intentions toward Originals and Counterfeits: Foreign Fashion Luxury Brands". Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing Industry, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.530-536, 2006.
  8. Hye-Jung Park and Kyung-Sook Jeon, "Determinants of Purchasing Counterfeit Luxury Brands" Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.286-295, 2006.
  9. Zhong Yuan Sun and Seog Ju Chang, "A Study on the Correlation between Forged Brand Quality and Purchase Intentions based on Types of Preference of Luxury Brands" Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp.337-353, 2013. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.337
  10. Seung Hee Lee and Mi Young Kim & Soo Kyeong Park , "The Study of the Consumers' Attitudes toward Fashion Counterfeit and Brand Equity - Focusing on mediate Role of Brand Attachment". Journal of the Korean Consupmtion Association , Vol.10, No.3, pp.87-104, 2007.
  11. Seung Yeob Yu & Na Mi Kim, "A Comparison Counterfeit Goods use Behavior in Korea and China Consumer: focus on Motivation, Benefit and Cost Factor". Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp.117-124, 2012.
  12. Seung Soo Han, "The Influence of Self-expressive Consuming Propensity on Brand Attachment : Focused on the Net-effect by Controlling Social Desirability", The Journal of Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies,Vol. 49 No. 6, pp.493-516, 2005.
  13. In-Sik Jung and Gwi-Gon Kim, "A Study on Globalness of Brands and Consumer Behavior" International business review, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp.165-178, 2004. https://doi.org/10.21739/IBR.2004.06.8.1.165
  14. C. Min Han ,Seul Li Lee, and Sang Youp Rhee, "Brand Globalness vs. Country Image -Are Global Brands Immune from Country-of-origin Effects? " Korean Academy of International Business, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp.1-23, 2011.
  15. Choong-Min Han, "The 21st Century and globalization of the world market", Korea Institute of Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 12, pp.47-50, 1999.
  16. Aaker, D. A., "Managing brand equity". The Free Press, New York, 1991.
  17. Aaker, D. A. & Keller, K. L., "Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extension", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp.27-41, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252171
  18. Barnett, J., "Shopping for Gucci on Canal Street: Reflections on Status Consumption, Intellectual Property and the Incentive Thesis", Virginia Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp.1381-1423, 2005.
  19. Batra, Rajeeve, V. Ramaswamy, D. Alden, J-B Steenkamp and S. Ramachander, "Effects of Brand Local/Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Conutries", Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.83-95, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_3
  20. Cordell, V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick,R. "Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of Lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants". Journal of Business Research,Vol. 35, pp.41-53, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7
  21. Dubois, B. & Duquesne, P., "The Market for Luxury Goods: Income Versus Culture", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.35-44, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569310024530
  22. Holt, Douglas B., "How Consumers Consume: Towarda Typology of Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, 22(June), pp.1-25, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1086/209431
  23. Keller, K. L. "Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity", Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River,NJ, 1998.
  24. Kapferer, J. N., Strategic Brand Management, 2nd edn, Kogan Page: Dover, NH, 1997.
  25. Low, George S. and Lamb, Charles J, "The measurement and Dimensionality of Brand Associations". Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp.350-370, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010356966
  26. Nia, A & Zaichkowsky, L., "Do Counterfeit Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brand?", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp.458-497, 2000.
  27. Ozsomer, Aysegul and Selin Altaras, "Global Brand Purchase Likelihood: A Critical Synthesis and an Integrated Conceptual Framework", Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 1-28, 2008.
  28. Prendergast, M., Podus, D., Chang, E. and Urada, D."The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies". Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 67, pp.53-72, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00014-5
  29. Plummer, J. T., "How Personality Makes a Difference". Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp.79-63, 1985. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-40-6-79-83
  30. Silverstein, M. j. and Fiske, N."Luxuty for the masses. Harvard Business Review", Vol. 81, No. 4, pp.48-57, 2003.
  31. Steenkamp, J-B E. M., B. Rajeev., and D.L. Alden, "How Perceived Brand Globalness Greates Brand Value", Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, pp.53-65, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400002
  32. Wee, C., Tan, S., & Cheok, K, "Non-price determinants of intention to Purchase counterfeit goods", International Marketing Review, Vol. 12, pp.1-46, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)90020-9
  33. Wiedmann, K. P,. Hennigs, N., Siebels, A, "Value-based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior",2009.
  34. Yoo, Jae-Mee. "The Impact of Counterfeiting on the Consumers' Attitude toward Luxury Brand: Comparison Study between Genuine-Item Consumers vs. Counterfeit-Item Consumers." Journal of Consumer Studies22(2): pp.114-137,2011.
  35. Incheon Development Institute of Korea Home page, http://hanzhong.idi.re.kr, The latest trends China. Vol. 153, p.2, March 23, 2015.
  36. DOI: http://choonsik.blogspot.kr/2016/01/2015.html

피인용 문헌

  1. Moral and Ethical Antecedents of Attitude Toward Counterfeit Luxury Products: Evidence from Pakistan vol.54, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1480365