DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity analysis of probabilistic seismic behaviour of wood frame buildings

  • Gu, Jianzhong (Architectural and Engineering Technology, Thompson Rivers University)
  • Received : 2016.03.21
  • Accepted : 2016.06.23
  • Published : 2016.07.25

Abstract

This paper examines the contribution of three sources of uncertainties to probabilistic seismic behaviour of wood frame buildings, including ground motions, intensity and seismic mass. This sensitivity analysis is performed using three methods, including the traditional method based on the conditional distributions of ground motions at given intensity measures, a method using the summation of conditional distributions at given ground motion records, and the Monte Carlo simulation. FEMA P-695 ground motions and its scaling methods are used in the analysis. Two archetype buildings are used in the sensitivity analysis, including a two-storey building and a four-storey building. The results of these analyses indicate that using data-fitting techniques to obtain probability distributions may cause some errors. Linear interpolation combined with data-fitting technique may be employed to improve the accuracy of the calculated exceeding probability. The procedures can be used to quantify the risk of wood frame buildings in seismic events and to calibrate seismic design provisions towards design code improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2009), "Quantification of building seismic performance factors", FEMA P-695 report, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.
  2. Ceccotti, A. and Foschi, R.O. (1999), "Reliability assessment of wood shear walls under earthquake excitation", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, Balkema, Brookfield, Vermont.
  3. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  4. Ellingwood, B., Rosowsky, D., Li, Y. and Kim, J. (2004), "Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards", J. Struct. Eng., 130(12), 1921-1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921)
  5. Filiatrault, A., Christovasilis, I., Wanitkorkul, A. and van de Lindt, J. (2010), "Experimental seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building", J. Struct. Eng., 136(3), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000112
  6. Filiatrault, A. and Folz, B. (2002), "Performance-based seismic design of wood framed buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 128(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(39)
  7. Fischer, D., Filiatrault, A., Folz, B., Uang, C.M. and Seible, F. (2001), "Shake table tests of a two-story woodframe house", CUREE Rep. No. W-06, Task 1.1.1, Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, Richmond, California.
  8. Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2001), "Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls", J. Struct. Eng., 127(4), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(433)
  9. Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2004), "Seismic analysis of woodframe structures II: model implementation and verification", J. Struct. Eng., 130(9), 1361-1370. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1361)
  10. Li, Y., Yin, Y., Ellingwood, B.R. and Bulleit, W.M. (2010), "Uniform hazard versus uniform risk bases for performance-based earthquake engineering of light-frame wood construction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1199-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.989
  11. Pang, W., Rosowsky, D.V., Ellingwood, B.R. and Wang Y. (2009), "Seismic fragility analysis and retrofit of conventional residential wood-frame structures in the Central United States", J. Struct. Eng., 135(3), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(262)
  12. Pei, S., van de Lindt, J. and Popovski, M. (2012), "Approximate R-factor for cross laminated timber walls in multi-story buildings", J. Archit. Eng., 19(4), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000117
  13. Rosowsky, D.V. (2002), "Reliability-based seismic design of wood shear wall", J. Struct. Eng., 128(11), 1439-1453. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:11(1439)
  14. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  15. van de Lindt, J., Pei, S., Pryor, S.E., Shimizu, H. and Isoda, H. (2010), "Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building", J. Struct. Eng., 136(10), 1262-1272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000222
  16. van de Lindt, J., Rosowsky, D., Pang, W. and Pei, S. (2013), "Performance-based seismic design of midrise woodframe buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 139(8), 1294-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000653
  17. Wang, C.H. and Foliente, G.C. (2006), "Seismic reliability of low-rise nonsymmetric woodframe buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 132(5), 733-744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(733)
  18. Zhang, J. and Foschi, R.O. (2004), "Performance-based design and seismic reliability analysis using designed experiments and neural networks", Prob. Eng. Mech., 19(3), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.02.009

Cited by

  1. The Moment-Independent Importance Analysis of Structural Seismic Requirements Based on Orthogonal Polynomial Estimation vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9572192
  2. Seismic performance of South Nias traditional timber houses: A priority ranking based condition assessment vol.18, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.6.731
  3. Reliability and fragility assessment of mid- and high-rise wood buildings subjected to seismic excitation vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1725066
  4. Seismic fragility analysis of wood frame building in hilly region vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.097