Corrosion Science and Technology

The Corrosion Science Society of Korea (한국부식방식학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Role of Ca in Modifying Corrosion Resistance and Bioactivity of Plasma Anodized AM60 Magnesium Alloys

  • Received : 2016.01.28
  • Accepted : 2016.06.26
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The effect of alloying element Ca (0, 1, and 2 wt%) on corrosion resistance and bioactivity of the as-received and anodized surface of rolled plate AM60 alloys was investigated. A plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) was carried out to form anodic oxide film in $0.5mol\;dm^{-3}\;Na_3PO_4$ solution. The corrosion behavior was studied by polarization measurements while the in vitro bioactivity was tested by soaking the specimens in Simulated Body Fluid (1.5xSBF). Optical micrograph and elemental analysis of the substrate surfaces indicated that the number of intermetallic particles increased with Ca content in the alloys owing to the formation of a new phase $Al_2Ca$. The corrosion resistance of AM60 specimens improved only slightly by alloying with 2 wt% Ca which was attributed to the reticular distribution of $Al_2Ca$ phase existed in the alloy that might became barrier for corrosion propagation across grain boundaries. Corrosion resistance of the three alloys was significantly improved by coating the substrates with anodic oxide film formed by PEO. The film mainly composed of magnesium phosphate with thickness in the range $30-40{\mu}m$. The heat resistant phase of $Al_2Ca$ was believed to retard the plasma discharge during anodization and, hence, decreased the film thickness of Ca-containing alloys. The highest apatite forming ability in 1.5xSBF was observed for AM60-1Ca specimens (both substrate and anodized) that exhibited more degradation than the other two alloys as indicated by surface observation. The increase of surface roughness and the degree of supersaturation of 1.5xSBF due to dissolution of Mg ions from the substrate surface or the release of film compounds from the anodized surface are important factors to enhance deposition of Ca-P compound on the specimen surfaces.

Keywords

References

  1. L. C. Li, J. C. Gao, Y. Wang, Surf. Coat. Tech., 185, 92 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.004
  2. F. Witte, V. Kaese, H. Haferkamp, E. Switzer, A. Meyer-Lindberg, C. J. Wirth, H. Windhagen, Biomaterials, 26, 3557 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049
  3. G. Song, Corros. Sci., 49, 1696 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.001
  4. Z. Li, X. Gu, S. Lou, Y. Zheng, Biomaterials, 29, 1329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021
  5. M. B. Kannan, R. K. S. Raman, Biomaterials, 29, 2306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.003
  6. S. Virtanen, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 176, 1600 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.05.028
  7. J. Vormann, Mol. Aspects Med., 24, 27 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00089-4
  8. O. Lunder, Corrosion Rev., 15, 439 (1997).
  9. B. Kondori, R. Mahmudi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 2014 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.043
  10. J. Z. Ilich, J. E. Kerstetter, J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 19, 715 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2000.10718070
  11. Anawati, H. Tanigawa, H. Asoh, S. Ono, Corros. Sci., 70, 212 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.01.032
  12. L. Muller, F. A. Muller, Acta Biomater. 2, 181 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2005.11.001
  13. A. A. Nayeb-Hashemi, J. B. Clark, Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, 8, 58 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02868900
  14. H. I. Kaplan, J. Hryn and B. Clow, Magnesium Technology 2000, p. 279 (TMS, 2000).