Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An experimental study of vibration control of wind-excited high-rise buildings using particle tuned mass dampers

  • Lu, Zheng (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Wang, Dianchao (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Masri, Sami F. (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California) ;
  • Lu, Xilin (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • Received : 2015.09.26
  • Accepted : 2016.05.06
  • Published : 2016.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A particle tuned mass damper (PTMD) system is the combination of a traditional tuned mass damper (TMD) and a particle damper (PD). This paper presents the results of an experimental and analytical study of the damping performance of a PTMD attached to the top of a benchmark model under wind load excitation. The length ratio of the test model is 1:200. The vibration reduction laws of the system were explored by changing some system parameters (including the particle material, total auxiliary mass ratio, the mass ratio between container and particles, the suspending length, and wind velocity). An appropriate analytical solution based on the concept of an equivalent single-unit impact damper is presented. Comparison between the experimental and analytical results shows that, with the proper use of the equivalent method, reasonably accurate estimates of the dynamic response of a primary system under wind load excitation can be obtained. The experimental and simulation results show the robustness of the new damper and indicate that the damping performance can be improved by controlling the particle density, increasing the amount of particles, and aggravating the impact of particles etc.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Aly, A.M. (2013), "Vibration control of high-rise buildings for wind: a robust passive and active tuned mass damper", Smart Struct. Syst., 13(3), 473-500. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.473
  2. ASCE Manual of Practice No. 67 on Wind Tunnel Studies of Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE.(2003).
  3. Andreaus, U., Baragatti, P. and Placidi, L. (2016), "Experimental and numerical investigations of the responses of a cantilever beam possibly contacting a deformable and dissipative obstacle under harmonic excitation" , Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 80(1), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2015.10.007
  4. Andreaus, U., Chiaia, B. and Placidi, L. (2013a), "Soft-impact dynamics of deformable bodies", Continuum Mech. Therm., 25(2), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-012-0266-5
  5. Andreaus, U., Placidi, L. and Rega, G. (2010), "Numerical simulation of the soft contact dynamics of an impacting bilinear oscillator", Commun. Nonlinear Sci, Numer, Simul.,15(9), 2603-2616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.015
  6. Andreaus, U., Placidi, L. and Rega, G. (2013b), "Microcantilever dynamics in tapping mode atomic force microscopy via higher eigenmodes analysis", J. Appl. Phys., 113(22), 224302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4808446
  7. Bryce, L.F., Eric, M.F. and Steven, E.O. (2000), "Effectiveness and predictability of particle damping", Proceedings of the SPIE's 7th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, International Society for Optics and Photonics
  8. Campbell, R. (1995). "A true tall tale about the Hancock Tower", Boston Globe. 3.
  9. Clinton, J.F., Bradford, S.C., Heaton, T.H. and Favela, J. (2006), "The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050052
  10. Chiaia, B., Kumpyak, O., Placidi, L. and Maksimov, V. (2015), "Experimental analysis and modeling of two-way reinforced concrete slabs over different kinds of yielding supports under short-term dynamic loading", Eng. Struct.. 96, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.054
  11. Dell'Isola, F., Della Corte, A., Greco, L. and Luongo, A. (2015). "Plane bias extension test for a continuum with two inextensible families of fibers: A variational treatment with Lagrange multipliers and a perturbation solution", Int. J. Solids Struct., 81, 1-12.
  12. Esteki, K., Bagchi, A. and Sedaghti, R. (2015), "Semi-active control of seismic response of a building using MR fluid-based tuned mass damper", Smart Struct. Syst., 16(5), 807-833. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.5.807
  13. Ghorbani-Tanha, A.K., Noorzad, A. and Rahimian, M. (2009), "Mitigation of wind-induced motion of Milad Tower by tuned mass damper", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 18(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.421
  14. Gu, M. and Peng, F. (2002), "An experimental study of active control of wind-induced vibration of super-tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 90(12), 1919-1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00298-2
  15. Gu, M. and Quan, Y. (2004), "Across-wind loads of typical tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 92(13), 1147-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.06.004
  16. Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F. and Yao, J.T.P. (1997), "Structural control: past, present, and future", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 123(9), 897-971. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
  17. Hu, L., Huang, Q.B. and Liu, Z.X. (2008), "A non-obstructive particle damping model of DEM", Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des., 4(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-007-9053-z
  18. Karamodin, A. and Haji Kazemi, H. (2015), "Nonlinear control of structure using neuro-predictive algorithm", Smart Struct. Syst., 16(6), 1133-1145. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1133
  19. Lu, X. and Chen, J. (2011a), "Mitigation of wind-induced response of Shanghai Center Tower by tuned mass damper", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.659
  20. Lu, X. and Chen, J. (2011b), "Parameter optimization and structural design of tuned mass damper for shanghai centre tower", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(4), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.649
  21. Lu, Z., Lu, X.L., Lu, W.S. and Masri, S.F. (2012), "Shaking table test of the effects of multi-unit particle dampers attached to an MDOF system under earthquake excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41(5), 987-1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1170
  22. Lu, Z., Lu, X.L. and Masri, S.F. (2010), "Studies of the performance of particle dampers under dynamic loads", J. Sound Vib., 329(26), 5415-5433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.027
  23. Lu, Z., Masri, S.F. and Lu, X.L. (2011a), "Parametric studies of the performance of particle dampers under harmonic excitation", Sturct. Control Health Monit., 18(1), 79-98.
  24. Lu, Z., Masri, S.F. and Lu, X.L. (2011b), "Studies of the performance of particle dampers attached to a two-degree-of-freedom system under random excitation", J. Vib. Control, 17(10), 1454-1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546310370687
  25. Lu, Z., Wang, D.C. and Li, P.Z. (2014), "Comparison study of vibration control effects between suspended tuned mass damper and particle damper", J. Shock Vib.. 2014.
  26. Masri, S.F. and Ibrahim, A.M. (1973), "Response of the impact damper to stationary random excitation", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 53(1), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913319
  27. Masri, S.F. and Ibrahim, A.M. (1972), "Stochastic excitation of a simple system with impact damper", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 1(4), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290010404
  28. Naeim, F., Lew, M. and Carpenter, L.D. (2011), "Performance of tall buildings in Santiago, Chile during the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.675
  29. Papalou, A. and Masri, S.F. (1996), "Performance of particle dampers under random excitation", J. Vib. Acoust. - T- Asme. 118(4), 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2888343
  30. Papalou, A. and Strepelias, E. (2014), "Effectiveness of particle dampers in reducing monuments' response under dynamic loads", Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 23(2),128-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2014.943913
  31. Petersen, N.R. (1980), "Design of large scale tuned mass dampers", Struct. Control, 581-596.
  32. Piccardo, G., Tubino, F. and Luongo, A. (2015), "Equivalent nonlinear beam model for the 3-D analysis of shear-type buildings: Application to aeroelastic instability", Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 80, 52-65.
  33. Quan, Y. (2002), "Super high-rise building's wind loads and response in across-wind direction", Ph.D. Dissertation, Tongji University, Shanghai.
  34. Saeki, M. (2002), "Impact damping with granular materials in a horizontally vibrating system", J. Sound Vib., 251(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3985
  35. Samali, B., Kwok, K., Wood, G. and Yang, J. N. (2004), "Wind tunnel tests for wind-excited benchmark building", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 130(4), 447-450. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(447)
  36. Sharma, S., Vig, R. and Kumar, N. (2015), "Active vibration control: considering effect of electric field on coefficients of PZT patches", Smart Struct. Syst., 16(6), 1091-1105. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1091
  37. Sims, N.D., Amarasinghe, A. and Ridgway, K. (2005), "Particle dampers for workpiece chatter mitigation", Manuf. Eng., 16(1), 825-832.
  38. Smart Structures Technology Laboratory (SSTL). (2002), "Structural control: Benchmark comparisons",
  39. Tanaka, H. and Mak, C. (1983), "Effect of tuned mass dampers on wind induced response of tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 14, 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90037-5
  40. Vickery, B.J., Davenport, A.G. and Wargon, C. (1970), An Investigation Of The Behaviour In Wind Of The Proposed Centrepoint Tower In Sydney, Australia, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  41. Warnitchai, P. and Hoang, N. (2006), "Optimal placement and tuning of multiple tuned mass dampers for suppressing multi-mode structural response", Smart Struct. Syst., 2(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.1.001
  42. Yan, W., Xu, W.B., Wang, J. and Chen, Y.J. (2013), "Experimental research on the effects of a tuned particle damper on a viaduct system under seismic loads", J. Bridge Eng., 19(3).
  43. Yang, J.N., Agrawal, A.K., Samali, B. and Wu, J.C. (2004), "Benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings", J. Eng. Mech.- ASCE, 130(4), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(437)
  44. Yao, J.T.P. (1972), "Concept of structural control", J. Struct. Div. - ASCE, 98(7), 1567-1574.

Cited by

  1. Momentum exchange impact damper design methodology for object-wall-collision problems 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317703202
  2. Investigation into the influence of particles' friction coefficient on vibration suppression in gear transmission vol.108, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.10.015
  3. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of a Laminated Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall with a Vertical Seam vol.7, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060629
  4. Studies on Pounding Response Considering Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction under Seismic Loads vol.9, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122219
  5. Preliminary Study on the Damping Effect of a Lateral Damping Buffer under a Debris Flow Load vol.7, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7020201
  6. Research on the impact of surface properties of particle on damping effect in gear transmission under high speed and heavy load vol.98, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.05.021
  7. Particle impact dampers: Past, present, and future vol.25, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2058
  8. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of a superimposed reinforced concrete shear wall structure vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1412
  9. An equivalent method for optimization of particle tuned mass damper based on experimental parametric study 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.048
  10. Base Pounding Model and Response Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures under Earthquake Excitation vol.7, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121238
  11. Study on Adaptive-Passive and Semi-Active Eddy Current Tuned Mass Damper with Variable Damping vol.10, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010099
  12. Experimental investigation on dynamic characterization and seismic control performance of a TLPD system vol.26, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1350
  13. Numerical analysis of a shaking table test on dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction under earthquake excitations vol.26, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1382
  14. Studies on passive flexible protection to resist landslides caused by the May 12, 2008, Wenchuan earthquake vol.26, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1372
  15. Studies on Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Columns with Grouted Splice Sleeve vol.7, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060571
  16. Experimental Study on the Performance of Polyurethane-Steel Sandwich Structure under Debris Flow vol.7, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101018
  17. Particle damping: Noise characteristics and large-scale simulation 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317716345
  18. Theoretical study and experimental validation on the energy dissipation mechanism of particle dampers 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2125
  19. Experimental parametric study on wind-induced vibration control of particle tuned mass damper on a benchmark high-rise building vol.26, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1359
  20. Serviceability-based damping optimization of randomly wind-excited high-rise buildings vol.26, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1371
  21. Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers vol.44, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015
  22. Studies on damping behavior of vertically mixed structures with upper steel and lower concrete substructures vol.26, pp.17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1392
  23. Experimental and analytical study on the performance of particle tuned mass dampers under seismic excitation vol.46, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2826
  24. Damping behaviors of granular particles in a vertically vibrated closed container vol.321, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.020
  25. Optimization design and experimental verification of track nonlinear energy sink for vibration control under seismic excitation vol.24, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2033
  26. Application of an Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm in an Optimum Tuned Mass Damper Design for a Pedestrian Bridge vol.8, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020175
  27. Discrete element method-based collapse simulation, validation and application to frame structures 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1373133
  28. Optimizing parameters of tuned mass damper subjected to critical earthquake vol.27, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1460
  29. Parametric Study on Dynamic Response of FRP Masonry Structures under the Impacts of Debris Flow vol.2018, pp.1875-9203, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4527571
  30. Bidirectional wind response control of 76-story benchmark building using active mass damper with a rotating actuator vol.25, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2216
  31. Comparative Studies on Structures with a Tuned Mass Damper and a Particle Damper vol.31, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000878
  32. Shaking table test and numerical simulation on vibration control effects of TMD with different mass ratios on a super high-rise structure vol.27, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1470
  33. Experimental study on seismic performance of L-shaped partly precast reinforced concrete shear wall with cast-in-situ boundary elements pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1602
  34. Optimization and application of multiple tuned mass dampers in the vibration control of pedestrian bridges vol.62, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.1.055
  35. Self-control of high rise building L-shape in plan considering soil structure interaction vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2017.6.3.229
  36. Performance-based optimal design of tuned impact damper for seismically excited nonlinear building vol.160, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.042
  37. Experimental study on seismic behavior of steel plate reinforced concrete composite shear wall vol.160, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.050
  38. Evaluating the use of a new type of impact damper for internal turning tool bar in deep holes vol.101, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3039-x
  39. New Numerical Results from Simulations of Beams and Space Frame Systems with a Tuned Mass Damper vol.12, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081329
  40. A system of multiple controllers for attenuating the dynamic response of multimode floor structures to human walking vol.23, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.5.467
  41. Dynamic Response Control of a Wind-Excited Tall Building with Distributed Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers vol.19, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455419500597
  42. Experimental research on the multilayer compartmental particle damper and its application methods on long-period bridge structures vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0509-z
  43. TMD effectiveness in nonlinear RC structures subjected to near fault earthquakes vol.24, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.24.4.447
  44. Research on the Application of an Information System in Monitoring the Dynamic Deformation of a High-Rise Building vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3714973
  45. Wind-induced responses and dynamic characteristics of a super-tall building under a typhoon event vol.25, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.1.081
  46. An integrated damping system for tall buildings vol.29, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1724
  47. Influence of stainless steel impact damper on tribological properties during boring process vol.46, pp.p1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.260
  48. A hybrid seismic isolation system toward more resilient structures: Shaking table experiment and fragility analysis vol.38, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102194
  49. Evaluation of TMD Performance in Footbridges Using Human Walking Probabilistic Models vol.4, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration4020021
  50. Study on the damping mechanisms of a suspended particle damper attached to a wind turbine tower vol.33, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2021.33.1.103
  51. A practical combination method for wind-induced responses of high-rise buildings: Based on the correlation of extremes vol.36, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.016