Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic transient analysis of systems with material nonlinearity: a model order reduction approach

  • Casciati, F. (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia) ;
  • Faravelli, L. (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia)
  • Received : 2015.09.26
  • Accepted : 2016.05.06
  • Published : 2016.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Model Order Reduction (MOR) denotes the theory by which one tries to catch a model of order lower than that of the real model. This is conveniently pursued in view of the design of an efficient structural control scheme, just passive within this paper. When the nonlinear response of the reference structural system affects the nature of the reduced model, making it dependent on the visited subset of the input-output space, standard MOR techniques do not apply. The mathematical theory offers some specific alternatives, which however involve a degree of sophistication unjustified in the presence of a few localized nonlinearities. This paper suggests applying standard MOR to the linear parts of the structural system, the interface remaining the original unreduced nonlinear components. A case study focused on the effects of a helicopter land crash is used to exemplify the proposal.

Keywords

References

  1. Basu, B., Bursi, O.S., Casciati, F. et al. (2014), "A European association for the control of structures joint perspective. Recent studies in civil structural control across Europe", Struct. Control Health Monit., 21(12), 1414-1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1652
  2. Casciati, F, and Casciati, S. (2006), "Structural health monitoring by Lyapunov exponents of non-linear time series" , Struct. Control Health Monit., 13(1), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.141
  3. Casciati, F. and Casciati, S. (2016), "Designing the control law on reduced-order models of large structural systems", Struct. Control Health Monit., 23(4) ,707-718. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1805
  4. Casciati, F. and Faravelli, L. (1991), Fragility analysis of complex structural systems, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.
  5. Casciati, F. and Faravelli, L. (2012), "Model order reduction issues for integrated structural control design", Adv. Sci. Technol., 83, 37. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.83.37
  6. Casciati, F. and Faravelli, L. (2014), "Sensor placement driven by a model order reduction (MOR) reasoning", Smart Struct. Syst., 13(3), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.343
  7. Casciati, S. (2014), "Differential evolution approach to reliability-oriented optimal design", Probab. Eng. Mech., 36, 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.001
  8. Casciati, S. and Borja, R.L. (2004), "Dynamic FE analysis of south Memnon colossus including 3D soil-foundation-structure interaction", Comput. Struct., 82(20-21), 1719-1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.02.026
  9. Casciati, S. and Faravelli, L. (2014), "Quantity vs. quality in the model order reduction (MOR) of a linear system", Smart Struct. Syst., 13(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.1.099
  10. Casciati, S. and Osman, A. (2005), "Damage assessment and retrofit study for the Luxor Memnon colossi", Struct. Control Health Monit., 12(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.53
  11. Casciati, S., Chassiakos, A.G. and Masri, S.F. (2014), "Toward a paradigm for civil structural control", Smart Struct. Syst., 14(5), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.981
  12. Faravelli, L. and Bigi, D. (1990), "Stochastic finite-elements for crash problems", Struct. Saf., 8(1-4), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90034-M
  13. Farhat, C., Avery, Ph., Chapman, T. and Cortial, J. (2014), "Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy-based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 98(9), 625-662. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4668
  14. Farhat, C., Chapman, T. and Avery, Ph. (2015), "Structure-preserving, stability, and accuracy properties of the energy-conserving sampling and weighting method for the hyper reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng, 102(5), 1077-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4820
  15. http://fas.org/nuke/intro/aircraft/afman32-1123.pdf (1999)
  16. http://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/150-5390-2b/150_5390_2b.doc (2004)
  17. http://www.mathworks.com/index.html?s_tid=gn_loc_drop (2004)
  18. http://www.mscsoftware.com/it/product/marc (2004)
  19. https://www.wbdg.org/ccb/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_260_01.pdf (2008)
  20. Marchese, R. (2015), Propagazione spazio-temporale degli effetti di un'esplosione (in Italian), Civil Engineering Master Thesis, University of Pavia.

Cited by

  1. Conceiving Meta-structures for Civil Engineering Applications vol.199, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.066
  2. Applications of noise barriers with a slanted flat-tip jagged cantilever for noise attenuation on a construction site 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317747779
  3. Inelastic response analysis of bridges subjected to non-stationary seismic excitations by efficient MCS based on explicit time-domain method pp.1573-269X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4477-6
  4. An inerter‐equipped vibrating barrier for noninvasive motion control of seismically excited structures vol.27, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2474