Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine

The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine (대한생식의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective study of single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer

  • Received : 2015.09.17
  • Accepted : 2016.01.30
  • Published : 2016.06.23
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinical outcomes of single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the hatching status of frozen-thawed blastocysts. Methods: Frozen-thawed blastocysts were divided into three groups according to their hatching status as follows: less-than-expanded blastocyst (${\leq}EdB$), hatching blastocyst (HgB), and hatched blastocyst (HdB). The female age and infertility factors of each group were evaluated. The quality of the single frozen-thawed blastocyst was also graded as grade A, tightly packed inner cell mass (ICM) and many cells organized in the trophectoderm epithelium (TE); grade B, several and loose ICM and TE; and grade C, very few ICM and a few cells in the TE. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were compared between each group. The data were analyzed by either t-test or chi-square analysis. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in average female ages, infertility factors, or the distribution of blastocyst grades A, B, and C in each group. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate of each group according to their blastocyst grade. However, there was a significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate between each group. In the HdB group, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were similar regardless of the blastocyst quality. Conclusion: There was an effect on the clinical outcomes depending on whether the blastocyst hatched during single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. When performing single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer, the hatching status of the frozen-thawed blastocyst may be a more important parameter for clinical outcomes than the quality of the frozen-thawed blastocyst.

Keywords

References

  1. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker K, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
  2. Alves da Motta EL, Alegretti JR, Baracat EC, Olive D, Serafini PC. High implantation and pregnancy rates with transfer of human blastocysts developed in preimplantation stage one and blastocyst media. Fertil Steril 1998;70:659-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00263-5
  3. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, Hackmon-Ram R, et al. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2004;81:567-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.031
  4. Schwarzler P, Zech H, Auer M, Pfau K, Gobel G, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2097-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh398
  5. Desai N, Goldfarb J. Examination of frozen cycles with replacement of a single thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:349-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60843-7
  6. Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem339
  7. Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Ohara M, Kawamura T. Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:531-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9275-5
  8. Han AR, Park CW, Lee HS, Yang KM, Song IO, Koong MK. Blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012;39:114-7. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2012.39.3.114
  9. Ishihara O, Araki R, Kuwahara A, Itakura A, Saito H, Adamson GD. Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertil Steril 2014;101:128-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025
  10. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2013;99:389-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044
  11. Heo YS, Yoon SH, Yoon HG, Cho HG, Yoon HG, Lee SW, et al. The studies on the development of human blastocyst embryos in IVF-ET program 1: the development of human blastocyst embryos by co-culture with cumulus cells. Korean J Fertil Steril 1996;23:155-62.
  12. Steinberg ML, Boulet S, Kissin D, Warner L, Jamieson DJ. Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome: United States, 1999 to 2010. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1937-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.134
  13. Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by prefreeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1199-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det054
  14. Okimura T, Kuwayama M, Segawa T, Takehara Y, Kato K, Kato O. Relations between the timing of transfer, expansion size and implantation ratesin frozen thawed single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2009;92(3 Suppl):S246.
  15. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
  16. Chimote NM, Mehta-Chimote BN, Chimote NN. Trophectoderm gradation and time of transfer are robust factors governing selection of best single blastocyst for transfer to predict implantation and live births in IVF [abstract P-179]. Hum Reprod 2004;29(Suppl 1):i191.
  17. Son WY, Yoon SH, Yoon HJ, Lee SM, Lim JH. Pregnancy outcome following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified on electron microscopy grids after induced collapse of the blastocoele. Hum Reprod 2003;18:137-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg029
  18. Lee SY, Jae BS, Lee SY, Son WY, Yoon SH, Lim JH. Optimization of a thawing method for human expanded blastocysts vitrified using EM-Grid after artificial shrinkage. Fertil Steril 2003;80 Suppl 3:147-8.
  19. Ryu EK, Hur YS, Ann JY, Maeng JY, Park M, Park JH, et al. Vitrification of mouse embryos using the thin plastic strip method. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012;39:153-60. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2012.39.4.153
  20. Goto S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M. Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2011;95:948-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.067
  21. Li T, Wang X, Yue C, Fang C. Comparison of pregnant outcomes of thawing blastocyst one day before transfer or not. Fertil Steril 2013;100(3 Suppl):S286.
  22. Tucker MJ, Cohen J, Massey JB, Mayer MP, Wiker SR, Wright G. Partial dissection of the zona pellucida of frozen-thawed human embryos may enhance blastocyst hatching, implantation, and pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:341-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90088-9
  23. Chimote NM, Chimote NN, Nath NM, Mehta BN. Transfer of spontaneously hatching or hatched blastocyst yields better pregnancy rates than expanded blastocyst transfer. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013;6:183-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.121420
  24. Kung FT, Lin YC, Tseng YJ, Huang FJ, Tsai MY, Chang SY. Transfer of frozen-thawed blastocysts that underwent quarter laser-assisted hatching at the day 3 cleaving stage before freezing. Fertil Steril 2003;79:893-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04846-X
  25. Ge HS, Zhou W, Zhang W, Lin JJ. Impact of assisted hatching on fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:589-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60466-X
  26. Hur YS, Park JH, Ryu EK, Yoon HJ, Yoon SH, Hur CY, et al. Effect of artificial shrinkage on clinical outcome in fresh blastocyst transfer cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2011;38:87-92. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2011.38.2.87
  27. Roy TK, Bradley CK, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent livebirth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.046
  28. Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon SH, Koh MW, Lim JH, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:423-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9736-8

Cited by

  1. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze vol.34, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0940-4
  2. Retrospective study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the presence of morphokinetic variables vol.45, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2018.45.1.52
  3. Associations of post-warming embryo or blastocyst development with clinical pregnancy in vitrified embryo or blastocyst transfer cycles vol.47, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.03321
  4. Laser‐assisted hatching on clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing single vitrified Blastocyst transfer: A propensity score–matched study vol.20, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12366