DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal: A study using cone-beam computed tomography

  • Received : 2015.09.30
  • Accepted : 2016.01.26
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: Sufficient area in the interforaminal region is required for dental implant placement, and the anterior loop of the mandibular canal is located within the limits of this area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and extent of the anterior loop in a Brazilian sample population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: CBCT images from 250 patients (500 hemimandibles) obtained for various clinical indications were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the presence and length of the anterior loop. The length of the anterior loop was then compared based on gender, age, and the side of the mandible. The data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test and linear regression analysis. Results: An anterior loop was identified in 41.6% of the cases, and its length ranged from 0.25 mm to 4.00 mm (mean, $1.1{\pm}0.8mm$). The loop had a greater mean length and was significantly more prevalent in males (p=0.014). No significant differences were found between the right and left sides regarding length (p=0.696) or prevalence (p=0.650). Conclusion: In this study, a high prevalence of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal was found, and although its length varied greatly, in most cases it was less than 1 mm long. Although this is a prevalent anatomical variation, safety limits for the placement of implants in this region cannot be established before an accurate evaluation using imaging techniques in order to identify and preserve the neurovascular bundles.

Keywords

References

  1. Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1022-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02261.x
  2. Rosa MB, Sotto-Maior BS, Machado Vde C, Francischone CE. Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 388-92. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2648
  3. Filo K, Schneider T, Locher MC, Kruse AL, Lubbers H. The inferior alveolar nerve's loop at the mental foramen and its implications for surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 260-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2013.34
  4. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1933-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060197
  5. Kaya Y, Sencimen M, Sahin S, Okcu KM, Dogan N, Bahcecitapar M. Retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and spiral computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 919-25.
  6. de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PH, de Azambuja Berti-Couto S, Stinkens L, Moyaert K, Rubira-Bullen IR, et al. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 387-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0544-9
  7. Parnia F, Moslehifard E, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, Mojaver-Kahnamoui H. Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e420-5.
  8. Uchida Y, Yamashita Y, Goto M, Hanihara T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 1772-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.015
  9. Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, et al. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 744-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.352
  10. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1061-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1061
  11. Kuzmanovic DV, Payne AG, Kieser JA, Dias GJ. Anterior loop of the mental nerve: a morphological and radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 464-71. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00869.x
  12. Li X, Jin ZK, Zhao H, Yang K, Duan JM, Wang WJ. The prevalence, length and position of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve in Chinese, assessed by spiral computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2013; 35: 823-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1104-6
  13. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 265-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042
  14. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-78. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/15779208
  15. Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32: 343-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0570-3
  16. Ngeow WC, Dionysius DD, Ishak H, Nambiar P. A radiographic study on the visualization of the anterior loop in dentate subjects of different age groups. J Oral Sci 2009; 51: 231-7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.231

Cited by

  1. Prevalence and Length of the Anterior Loop of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Iranians vol.43, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-16-00212
  2. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review vol.88, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160548
  3. Morphometric Analysis of the Mental Foramen Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography vol.2018, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4571895
  4. Association between the Anatomy of the Mandibular Canal and Facial Types: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis vol.2018, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5481383
  5. Analysis of the frequency of visualization of morphological variations in anatomical bone features in the mandibular interforaminal region through cone-beam computed tomography vol.40, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2040-2
  6. Novel Use of Orbita Plates in Mandibular Body Fractures vol.17, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1082-7
  7. Assessment of Anterior Loop of Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Its Anatomic Variations with Age, Gender, and Dentition Status in Indian Population: A CBCT Study vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1813603