DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Dietary Energy Levels on the Physiological Parameters and Reproductive Performance of Gestating Gilts

  • Jin, S.S. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, S.W. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang, J.C. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, W.L. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, J.H. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Y.Y. (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.04.06
  • Accepted : 2016.05.25
  • Published : 2016.07.01

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary energy levels on the physiological parameters and reproductive performance of gestating first parity sows. A total of 52 F1 gilts ($Yorkshire{\times}Landrace$) were allocated to 4 dietary treatments using a completely randomized design. Each treatment contained diets with 3,100, 3,200, 3,300, or 3,400 kcal of metabolizable energy (ME)/kg, and the daily energy intake of the gestating gilts in each treatment were 6,200, 6,400, 6,600, and 6,800 kcal of ME, respectively. During gestation, the body weight (p = 0.04) and weight gain (p = 0.01) of gilts linearly increased with increasing dietary energy levels. Backfat thickness was not affected at d110 of gestation by dietary treatments, but increased linearly (p = 0.05) from breeding to d 110 of gestation. There were no significant differences on the litter size or litter birth weight. During lactation, the voluntary feed intake of sows tended to decrease when the dietary energy levels increased (p = 0.08). No difference was observed in backfat thickness of the sows within treatments; increasing energy levels linearly decreased the body weight of sows (p<0.05) at d 21 of lactation and body weight gain during lactation (p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the chemical compositions of colostrum and milk. Therefore, these results indicated that high-energy diets influenced the bodyweight and backfat thickness of sows during gestation and lactation. NRC (2012) suggested that the energy requirement of the gestation gilt should be between 6,678 and 7,932 kcal of ME/d. Similarly, our results suggested that 3,100 kcal of ME/kg is not enough to maintain the reproductive performance for gilts during gestation with 2 kg feed daily. Gilts in the treatment 3,400 kcal of ME/kg have a higher weaning number of piglets, but bodyweight and backfat loss were higher than other treatments during lactation. But bodyweight and backfat loss were higher than other treatments during lactation. Consequently, an adequate energy requirement of gestating gilts is 6,400 kcal of ME/d.

Keywords

References

  1. Almeida, F. R. C. L., R. N. Kirkwood, F. X. Aherne, and G. R. Foxcroft. 2000. Consequences of different patterns of feed intake during estrous cycle in gilts on subsequent fertility. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1566-1563.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. National Research Council, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  3. Armstrong, J. D., J. H. Britt, and R. R. Kraeling. 1986. Effect of restriction of energy during lactation on body condition, energy metabolism, endocrine changes and reproductive performance in primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1915-1925. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.6361915x
  4. Baidoo, S. K., F. X. Aherne, R. N. Kirkwood, and G. R. Foxcroft. 1992. Effect of feed intake during lactation and after weaning on sow reproductive performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:911-917. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-103
  5. Boyd, R. D., K. J. Touchette, G. C. Castro, M. E. Johnston, K. U. Lee, and In K. Han. 2000. Recent advances in amino acid and energy nutrition of prolific sows. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1638-1652. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1638
  6. Christon, R., G. Saminadin, H. Lionet, and B. Racon. 1999. Dietary fat and climate alter food intake, performance of lactating sows and their litters and fatty acid composition of milk. Anim. Sci. 69:353-365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980005092X
  7. Dourmad, J. Y., M. Etienne, J. Noblet, and D. Causeur. 1997. Prediction of the chemical composition of the reproductive sows from their bodyweight and backfat depth-Utilization for determining the energy rcordance. J. Rech. Porc. France. 29:255-262.
  8. Gamble, M. S. and G. A. Cook. 1985. Alteration of the apparent Ki of carnitine palmitoyltransferase for malonyl-CoA by the diabetic state and reversal by insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 260:9516-9519.
  9. Hahn, J. D., R. R. Biehl, and D. H. Baker. 1995. Ideal digestible lysine for early- and late-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 73:773-784. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.733773x
  10. Jang, Y. D., S. K. Jang, D. H. Kim, H. K. Oh, and Y. Y. Kim. 2014. Effects of dietary protein levels for gestating gilts on reproductive performance, blood metabolites and milk composition. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27:83-92. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13369
  11. Jindal, R., J. R. Cosgrove, F. X. Aherne, and G. R. Foxcroft. 1996. Effect of nutrition on embryonal mortality in gilts: Association with progesterone. J. Anim. Sci. 74:620-624. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.743620x
  12. Kemp, B., N. M. Soede, F. A. Helmond, and M. W. Bosch. 1995. Effects of energy source in the diet on reproductive hormones and insulin during lactation and subsequent estrus in multiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3022-3029. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73103022x
  13. Kongsted, A. G. 2005. A review of the effect of energy intake on pregnancy rate and litter size-discussed in relation to grouphoused non-lactating sows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97:13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.02.001
  14. Kirkwood, R. N. and P. A. Thacker. 1988. Nutritional factors affecting embryonic mortality in pigs. Pig News Info. 9:15-21.
  15. Long, H. F., W. S. Ju, L. G. Piao, and Y. Y. Kim. 2010. Effect of dietary energy levels of gestating sows on physiological parameters and reproductive performance. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23:1080-1088. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.10053
  16. Mitre, R., M. Etienne, S. Martinais, H. Salmon, P. Allaume, P. Legrand, and A. B. Legrand. 2005. Humoral defence improvement and haematopoiesis stimulation in sows and offspring by oral supply of shark-liver oil to mothers during gestation and lactation. Br. J. Nutr. 94:753-762. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20051569
  17. Mateo, R. D., J. A. Carroll, Y. Hyun, S. Smith, and S. W. Kim. 2009. Effect of dietary supplementation of n-3 fatty acids and elevated concentrations of dietary protein on the performance of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 87:948-959. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-0964
  18. Noblet, J., J. Y. Dourmad, and M. Etienne. 1990. Energy utilization in pregnant and lactating sows: Modeling of energy requirements. J. Anim. Sci. 68:562-572. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.682562x
  19. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  20. NRC. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  21. Piao, L. G., W. S. Ju, H. F. Long, and Y. Y. Kim. 2010. Effects of various feeding methods for gestating gilts on reproductive performance and growth of their progeny. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23:1354-1363. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.10064
  22. Quesnel, H. and A. Prunier. 1998. Effect of insulin administration before weaning on reproductive performance in feed restricted primiparous sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 51:119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00061-X
  23. Ruiz, M. E., R. C. Ewan, and V. C. Speer. 1971. Serum metabolites of pregnant and hysterectomized gilts fed two levels of energy. J. Anim. Sci. 32:1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.3261153x
  24. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  25. Shimizu, S., K. Inoue, Y. Tani, and H. Yamada. 1979. Enzymatic microdetermination of serum free fatty acids. Analytical biochemistry. 98:341-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90151-9
  26. Whang, K. Y. and R. A. Easter. 2000. Blood urea nitrogen as an index of feed efficiency and lean growth potential in growing finishing-swine. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 13:811-816. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.811
  27. Whitley, N. C., M. Thomas, J. L. Ramirez, A. B. Moore, and N. M. Cox. 2002. Influences of parity and level of feed intake on reproductive response to insulin administration after weaning in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1038-1043. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8041038x
  28. Williams, I. H., W. H. Close, and D. J. A. Cole. 1985. Strategies for sow nutrition: Predicting the response of pregnant animals to protein and energy intake. In: Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (Eds. W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole). Butterworth, London, UK. pp. 133-147.
  29. Xue, J. L., Y. Koketsu, G. D. Dial, J. E. Pettigrew, and A. Sower. 1997. Glucose tolerance, luteinizing hormone release, and reproductive performance of first-litter sows fed two levels of energy during gestation. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1845-1852. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7571845x
  30. Yang, Y., S. Heo, Z. Jin, J. Yun, P. Shinde, J. Choi, B. Yan, and B. Chae. 2008. Effects of dietary energy and lysine intake during late gestation and lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, milk composition and reproductive performance in multiparous sows. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 62:10-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701780227

Cited by

  1. Colostrum and milk quality of sows fed different diets during mid-pregnancy vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/93953/2018
  2. Effects of dietary energy and lysine levels on physiological responses, reproductive performance, blood profiles, and milk composition in primiparous sows vol.62, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.334