DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Robot Curriculum to consider Conceptual Understanding and Learning Activities for Elementary School

개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 초등학교 로봇 교육과정 모델 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Chul (Dept. of Computer Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 김철 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2016.12.12
  • Accepted : 2016.12.16
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

As the 4th industrial revolution has progressed in recent years, the importance of robot education in elementary school education is increasing. In this paper, I suggested robot education framework to consider conceptual understanding and learning activities based on the 2014, 2015 KAIE software education standard curriculum for elementary school. The framework is reconstructed the 7 stages, In order to generalize the standardized model of the software curriculum, the achievement criteria should be prepared according to the content system of the curriculum considering the conceptual understanding and learning activities proposed in this paper, and if the educational contents are developed and utilized, it is expected to contribute to the activation of robot education in addition to elementary school software education.

최근 4차 산업혁명이 진행됨에 따라 초등학교 교육현장에서도 로봇교육의 중요성이 높아지고 있다. 본 논문에서는 2014, 2015 한국정보교육학회 정보과 교육과정모델을 기반으로 초등학교 SW교육에서 로봇분야 관한 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 초등학교 로봇 교육과정을 제안하였다. 이는 2015 소프트웨어 표준모델에서 제시한 무학년제 7단계를 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 내용체계로 재구성 하였다. 소프트웨어 교육과정 표준모델 일반화를 위하여 본 논문에서 제안한 개념이해 및 학습활동을 고려한 교육과정의 내용체계에 따라 성취기준을 마련하고 그에 따른 교육용 콘텐츠를 개발하여 활용한다면 우리나라 초등학교 소프트웨어 교육과 더불어 로봇교육 활성화에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. CAS (2013), Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Computing at school.
  2. Chul Kim (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(3), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  3. Chul Kim (2015). A Design of Robot and Convergence Activity Curriculum Model for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.481
  4. CSTA (2011). The 2011 CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.csteachers.org/page/CSTA_Standards.
  5. K-12 CS Standards Revision Task Force members (2016). The Interim CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved http://www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/Standards/2016StandardsRevision/INTERIM_StandardsFINAL_07222.pdf.
  6. Department for Education in UK (2013). National curriculum in England: computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-inengland-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.
  7. Gapsu Kim (2016). An Implications of Computer Education in Korea from the U.S., U.K. and Germany Computer Curriculums. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 421-432.
  8. Joanna Goode, Gail Chapman (2016). Exploring Computer Science. Retrieved from http://www.exploringcs.org/curriculum.
  9. K12cs.org (2016). K-12 Computer Science Framework. Retrieved form http://K12cs.org.
  10. KAIE(2014), Chul Kim, Gapsu Kim, Hyunbae Kim, Youngsik Jeong, Ingee Jeong, Seonghun Ahn(2014), Contents of Information Science Curriculum for Elementary School, The Korean Association of Information Education.
  11. KAIE(2015), Chul Kim, Gapsu Kim, Hyunbae Kim, Youngsik Jeong, Ingee Jeong(2015). Development of software education curriculum model. The Korean Association of Information Education.
  12. Ministry of Education(2015). Software education guideline.
  13. Seungki Shin, Youngkwon Bae (2015). Study on the Implications about Curriculum Design through the Analysis of Software Education Policy in Estonia. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(3), 361-372. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.361