정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제20권6호
  • /
  • Pages.597-606
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비교사 테크놀로지 활용 역량의 중요도와 실행도 분석

Importance and Performance Analysis of Pre-service Teachers' Competencies related to the Use of Technology

  • Jo, Miheon (Cheongju National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.03
  • 심사 : 2016.12.22
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 TPCK 모델을 활용하여 초등 예비교사들의 테크놀로지 활용과 관련한 역량 실태를 분석하고, 중요도-실행도 분석을 통하여 테크놀로지 활용 교육에서 개선해야 할 사항들을 우선순위를 분류하여 제안하였다. C대학교 4학년에 재학중인 예비교사 165명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문도구를 사용하여 테크놀로지 지식(TK), 테크놀로지 교수지식(TPK), 테크놀로지 내용지식(TCK), 테크놀로지 교수 내용지식(TPCK)과 관련한 중요도와 실행도에 대하여 예비교사의 인식을 알아보았다. 중요도와 실행도 차이를 분석하고자 t검정을 실시한 결과, TK, TPK, TCK와 TPCK 각 역량 뿐 아니라 모든 17개의 세부 역량들에 대해 중요도와 실행도 간에 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 또한 중요도-실행도 분석을 실시한 결과, 우선적으로 집중하여 개선해야 할 세부 역량 5가지, 좋은 성과를 보이기에 유지해야 할 세부 역량 4가지, 저순위를 두어야 할 세부 역량 5가지 그리고 과잉 노력을 지양해야 할 세부 역량 3가지를 제안하였다.

By utilizing the TPCK model, this research analyzed the present state of pre-service elementary teachers' competencies related to the use of technology. It also conducted the Importance-Performance Analysis to prioritize remedial issues to improve curriculum related to the use of technology. A survey was conducted to 165 pre-service teachers who are senior students at a University. A questionnaire was used to investigate pre-service teachers' perception on the importance and performance related to Technology Knowledge, Technological Pedagogical Knowledge, Technological Content Knowledge and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. As the result of the t-test, significant differences between importance scores and performance scores were found in all the competencies and 17 sub-competencies. In addition, as the results of the importance-performance analysis, 5 sub-competencies were found to be concentrated for the improvement, and 4 sub-competencies were found to be kept up because of their good work. Also 5 sub-competencies were turned out to have low priority, and 3 sub-competencies were turned out to be possible overkill.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B.(2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  2. Chai, C.S., Ng, E.M.W., Li, W., Hong, H.Y. & Koh, J.H.L. (2013). Validating and modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 41-53.
  3. Eom, M.R., Shin, W.S., & Han, I.S.(2011). A survey in the differences of pre-service teachers' perception of the Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge(TPACK). The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(4), 141-165.
  4. Heo, H.O., & Lim, K.Y.(2011). Modeling of 21st Century Learner and Teacher Competencies. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  5. Howland, J., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R.(2012). Meaningful Learning with Technology(4th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  6. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A.(2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  7. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A.(2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  8. Joo, Y.J., Chung, A.K., Choi, M., & Yi, S.H.(2015). A study of factors influencing intention to use technology in teaching activities. Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers, 52(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2015.52.3.221
  9. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W.(2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
  10. Koehler, M.J., Shin, T.S., & Mishra, P.(2011). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R.N. Ronau, C.R. Rakes, & M.L. Niess(Eds.), Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches(pp. 16-31). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  11. Lee, K.W., Jeon, J.C., Huh, K.C., Hong, W.P., & Kim, M.S.(2009). Redesigning Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum for Developing Future Koreans' Core Competences. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  12. Martilla, J.A., & James, J.C.(1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing. 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  13. Ministry of Education(2015). Elementary School Curriculum. [Separate Volume 2].
  14. Ministry of Education, & Korea Education and Research Information Service(2015). White Paper on ICT in Education Korea.
  15. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J.(2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge, Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  16. Na, J., & Song, J.(2014). An analysis of trends in science education research on instructional technology and its implications for science teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPCK). Teacher Education Research, 53(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.53.3.201409.511
  17. Park, K.C., & Kang, S.J.(2014). The development of cognitive path model on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) among elementary.secondary teachers. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 349-375. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.4.349
  18. Schimidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S.(2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  19. Shulman, L.S.(1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  20. So, Y.(2013). Analysis of the structural relations between TPACK, teaching efficacy, and perceived teaching professionalism in primary school teachers. Asian Journal of Education, 14(4), 125-147. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2013.14.4.006
  21. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J.(2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

피인용 문헌

  1. 수학교사의 테크놀로지 교수 내용 지식(TPACK)에 대한 연구 : TPACK에 대한 인식 및 교육요구도 분석 중심으로 vol.57, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2018.57.1.1