Archives of Craniofacial Surgery (대한두개안면성형외과학회지)

Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (대한두개안면성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aesthetic Facial Correction of Cleidocranial Dysplasia

  • Hwang, So-Min (Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital) ;
  • Park, Beom (Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital) ;
  • Hwang, Min-Kyu (Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min-Wook (Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Seo (Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.08.26
  • Accepted : 2015.12.03
  • Published : 2016.06.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We report two cases of cleidocranial dysplasia, which was managed without significant craniofacial osteotomy. A mother and daughter, both of normal intelligence, presented with central forehead depression, mid-face hypoplasia, and blepharoptosis. The fact that they have an identically deformed face implied a genetic basis. In both patients, radiologic evaluation revealed the underdeveloped maxilla, persistent fontanelle opening, and cleidal aplasia. Clinical findings and radiologic studies were consistent with the diagnosis of cleidocranial dysplasia. Both patients underwent forehead plasty via bicoronal approach, augmentation rhinoplasty using tip plasty, and epicanthoplasty. In addition, the mother underwent malar augmentation using Medpor implantation and reduction genioplasty. The patients did not experience any postoperative complication and remained satisfied with the operation at 6-year follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Mehta DN, Vachhani RV, Patel MB. Cleidocranial dysplasia: a report of two cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:251-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.85836
  2. Cohen MM Jr. Biology of RUNX2 and cleidocranial dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:130-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182636b7e
  3. Yoshida T, Kanegane H, Osato M, Yanagida M, Miyawaki T, Ito Y, et al. Functional analysis of RUNX2 mutations in cleidocranial dysplasia: novel insights into genotype-phenotype correlations. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2003;30:184-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-9796(03)00020-2
  4. Han K, Ham H, Kang J. An anthropometric analysis of cleidocranial dysostosis. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;21:121-34.
  5. Siggers DC. Cleidocranial dysostosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 1975;17:522-4.
  6. Fitchet SM. Cleidocranial dysostosis: hereditary and familial. J Bone Joint Surg 1929;11:838-66.
  7. Rushton MA. An anomaly of cementum in cleidocranial dysostosis. Br Dent J 1956;100:81-3.
  8. Jarvis JL, Keats TE. Cleidocranial dysostosis: a review of 40 new cases. Am J Roentgenol Radium er Nucl Med 1974;121:5-16. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.121.1.5

Cited by

  1. Craniofacial features of cleidocranial dysplasia vol.12, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.07.002
  2. Surgical Management and Evaluation of the Craniofacial Growth and Morphology in Cleidocranial Dysplasia : vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004334
  3. Clinical‐radiological approach for the diagnosis of cleidocranial dysplasia in adults: A familial cases series vol.9, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.5235