Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Progressive collapse analysis of steel building considering effects of infill panels

  • Received : 2015.12.10
  • Accepted : 2016.05.11
  • Published : 2016.07.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Simplifier assumptions which are used in numerical studies of progressive collapse phenomenon in structures indicate inconsistency between the numerical and experimental full-scale results. Neglecting the effects of infill panels and two-dimensional simulation are some of these assumptions. In this study, an existing seismically code-designed steel building is analyzed with alternate path method (AP) to assess its resistance against progressive collapse. In the AP method, the critical columns be removed immediately and stability of the remaining structure is investigated. Analytical macro-model based on the equivalent strut approach is used to simulate the effective infill panels. The 3-dimentional nonlinear dynamic analysis results show that modeling the slabs and infill panels can increase catenary actions and stability of the structure to resist progressive collapse even if more than one column removed. Finally, a formula is proposed to determine potential of collapse of the structure based on the quantity and quality of the produced plastic hinges in the connections.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC ASD (2001), "Specification for Structural Steel Buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction.
  2. ASCE 7-05 (2005), "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures", American Society of Civil Engineers.
  3. Astaneh-Asl, E.A., Madsen, C., Noble, R., Jung, D., McCallen, M.S., Hoehler, W., Li and Hwa, R. (2002), "Use of catenary cables to prevent progressive collapse of building", Report Number UCB/CEE-Steel-2001/02, Dept. of Civil and Env., Univ. of Calif., Berkeley.
  4. BHRC, No6, Iranian Building and housing Research Center, Loading on the buildings.
  5. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  6. Gross, J.L. and McGuire, W. (1983), "Progressive collapse resistant design", J. Struct. Eng., 109(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(1)
  7. GSA (2003), Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, US General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
  8. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Rahmani Samani, H. and Mirtaheri, M. (2014), "Free and rorced vibration analysis of an infilled steel frame: experimental, numerical, and analytical methods", Shock Vib., doi:10.1155/2014/439591
  9. Hayes, J.R. Jr., Woodson, S.C., Pekelnicky, R.G., Poland, C.D., Corley, W.G. and Sozen, M. (2005), "Can Strengthening for Earthquake Improve Blast and Progressive Collapse Resistance?", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 131(8), 1157-1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1157)
  10. IBC (2006), International Building Code, International Code Council, Washington, DC.
  11. Kaewkulchai, G. and Williamson, E.B. (2004), "Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis", Comput. Struct., 82, 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.12.001
  12. Kaewkulchai, G. and Williamson, E.B. (2006), "Modeling the impact of failed members for progressive collapse analysis of frame structures", ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(4), 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(375)
  13. Kheyroddin, A., Gerami, M. and Mehrabi, F. (2014), "Assessment of the dynamic effect of steel frame due to sudden middle column loss", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 23, 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1049
  14. Kim, J.K. and An, D.W. (2009), "Evaluation of progressive collapse potential of steel moment frames considering catenary action", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 18, 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.448
  15. Madan, A., Reinhorn, A.M., Mander, J.B. and Valles, R.E. (1997), "Modeling of masonry infill panels for structural analysis", J. Struct. Eng., 123, 1295-1302 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1295)
  16. Marjanishvili, S. and Agnew, E. (2006), "Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(4), 356-374.
  17. Marjanishvili, S.M. (2004), "Progressive analysis procedure for progressive collapse", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 18(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2004)18:2(79)
  18. Mirtaheri, M. and Abbasi Zoghi, M. (2016), "Design guides to resist progressive collapse for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(2), 357-378. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.357
  19. Mostafaei, H. and Kabeyasawa, T. (2004), "Effect of infill masonry walls on the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to the 2003 Bam earthquake strong motion: a case study of Bam telephone center", Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo.
  20. NISTIR 7396 (2007), Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
  21. PEER (2005), Open System for Earthquake Engineering (OpenSees), Univ. of California.
  22. Powell, G. (2005), "Progressive collapse: case studies using nonlinear analysis", Proceedings of ASCE 2005 Structures Congress: Metropolis and Beyond, New York.
  23. Sasani, M. and Sagiroglu, S. (2008), "Progressive collapse resistance of Hotel San Diego", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 134(3), 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(478)
  24. Sasani, M., Bazan, M. and Sagiroglu, S. (2007), "Experimental and analytical progressive collapse evaluation of actual reinforced concrete structure", ACI J. Struct. Eng., 104(6), 731-739.
  25. Sattar, S. (2013), "Influence of masonry infill walls and other building characteristics on seismic collapse of concrete frame buildings", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA.
  26. Song, B.I. and Sezen, H. (2009), "Evaluation of an existing steel frame building against progressive collapse", ASCE Structures 2009 Congress, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.
  27. Tasnimi, A.A and Mohebkhah, A, (2011), "Investigation on the behavior of brick-infilled steel frames with openings, experimental and analytical approaches", Eng. Struct., 33, 968-980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.018
  28. Tsitos, A. and Mosqueda, G. (2010), "Experimental investigation of progressive collapse of conventional, and post-tensioned steel frames", 14ECEE, Ohio.
  29. Tsitos, A., Mosqueda, G., Filiatrault, A. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2008), "Experimental investigation of progressive collapse of steel frames under Multi-Hazard Extreme loading", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  30. UFC 4-023-03 (2010), Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, Unified Facilities Criteria, Dept. of Defense, Washington, DC.

Cited by

  1. Progressive collapse analysis of buildings with concentric and eccentric braced frames vol.61, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.6.755
  2. Blast behavior of steel infill panels with various thickness and stiffener arrangement vol.65, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.5.587
  3. Height-thickness ratio on axial behavior of composite wall with truss connector vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.4.315
  4. Mitigation of progressive collapse in steel structures using a new passive connection vol.70, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.4.381
  5. Buckling analysis of steel plates in composite structures with novel shape function vol.35, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.3.405
  6. Progressive collapse risk of 2D and 3D steel-frame assemblies having shear connections vol.179, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106533