DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MG-63 osteoblast-like cell proliferation on auxetic PLGA scaffold with mechanical stimulation for bone tissue regeneration

  • Choi, Hong Jin (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Lee, Jun Jae (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Park, Yeong Jun (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Shin, Jung-Woog (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Sung, Hak-Joon (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University) ;
  • Shin, Ji Won (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Wu, Yanru (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong Koo (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.06
  • 심사 : 2016.10.08
  • 발행 : 2016.12.01

초록

Background: Auxetic scaffolds (experimental) was fabricated by using poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid), 50:50, (PLGA) for effective bone cell proliferation with mechanical stimulation. Methods: Negative Poisson's ratio in scaffold, 3-directional volumetric compression was applied during the scaffold fabrication at adequate temperature ($60^{\circ}C$). The pore size of scaffold ranged between 355 and $400{\mu}m$. Results: The porous morphology of the prepared auxetic scaffolds had shown partially concave and dent shapes in SEM image as expected. The lowest Poisson's ratios of experimental group was -0.07 at $60^{\circ}C/10min$. Compressive strength of experimental group was shown about 3.12 times higher than control group (conventional scaffold) in dry state at $25^{\circ}C$. The compressive strengths of both groups were tended to be decreased dramatically in wet state compared to in dry state. However, compressive strengths of experimental group were higher 3.08 times and 1.88 times in EtOH/PBS ($25^{\circ}C$) and EtOH/PBS/DMEM ($37^{\circ}C$) than control group in wet state, respectively. Degradation rate of the scaffolds showed about 16 % weight loss in 5 weeks. In cell attachment test, experimental group showed 1.46 times higher cell proliferation than control group at 1-day with compressive stimulation. In 3-day culture, the experimental group showed 1.32 times higher than control group. However, there was no significant difference in cell proliferation in 5-day cultivation. Conclusion: Overall, negative Poisson's ratio scaffolds with static mechanical stimulation could affect the cell proliferation at initial cultivation time.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea

참고문헌

  1. Yoon JJ, Park TG. Degradation behaviors of biodegradable macroporous scaffolds prepared by gas foaming of effervescent salts. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:401-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<401::AID-JBM1029>3.0.CO;2-H
  2. Lee JJ, Lee SG, Park JC, Yang YI, Kim JK. Investigation on biodegradable PLGA scaffold with various pore size structure for skin tissue engineering. Curr Appl Phys. 2007;7S1:e37-40.
  3. Oh SH, Park IK, Kim JM, Lee JH. In vitro and in vivo characteristic of PCL scaffold with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1664-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.024
  4. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. Porous polymeric structures for tissue engineering prepared by a coagulation, compression moulding and salt leaching technique. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1937-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00562-8
  5. Wu L, Zhang J, Jing D, Ding J. "Wet-state" mechanical properties of threedimensional polyester porous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2006;76A:264-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30544
  6. Dado D, Levenberg S. Cell-scaffold mechanical interplay within engineered tissue. Cell & Developmental Biology. 2009;20:656-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.02.001
  7. Brown TD. Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: a review. J Biomech. 2000;33:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00177-3
  8. Frias C, Reis J, Capela e Silva F, et al. Piezoelectric actuator: Searching inspiration in nature for osteoblast stimulation. Compos Sci Technol. 2010;70:1920-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.011
  9. Rath B, Nam J, Knobloch TJ, et al. Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts. J Biomech. 2008;41:1095-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.024
  10. Zhong Z, Zeng X-L, Ni J-H, et al. Comparison of the biological response of osteoblasts after tension and compression. Eur J Orthod. 2011;35:59-65.
  11. Wan H, Ohtaki H, Kotosaka S, Hu G. A study of negative Poisson's ratios in auxetic honeycombs based on a large deflection model. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2004;23:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006
  12. Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson's ratio. Science. 1987;235:1038-40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.1038
  13. Choi JB, Lakes RS. Non-linear properties of polymer cellular materials with a negative Poisson's ratio. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:4678-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01166005
  14. Brandel B, Lakes RS. Negative Poisson's ratio polyethylene foams. J Mater Sci. 2001;36:5885-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012928726952
  15. Park YJ, Kim JK. The effect of negative Poisson's ratio polyurethane scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/85289.
  16. Park YJ, MS. MG-63 osteoblastic-like cell proliferation on auxetic PLGA scaffold with mechanical stimulation for bone tissue engineering. Inje University, Kimhae, Korea. 2014;3:1-54

피인용 문헌

  1. In vitro study on anti-inflammatory effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded nano- and microscale particles vol.12, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s146296
  2. Glycosaminoglycan-based resorbable polymer composites in tissue refurbishment vol.12, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2017-0012
  3. MG-63 Cell Proliferation with Static or Dynamic Compressive Stimulation on an Auxetic PLGA Scaffold vol.2017, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1286109
  4. Vascular differentiation from pluripotent stem cells in 3‐D auxetic scaffolds vol.12, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2695
  5. Fabrication and optimization of Nanodiamonds-composited poly(ε-caprolactone) fibrous matrices for potential regeneration of hard tissues vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0126-x
  6. Silica nanoparticles-incorporated carbon nanofibers as bioactive biomaterial for bone tissue engineering vol.115, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2021.108320
  7. Auxetic Structures for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds and Biomedical Devices vol.14, pp.22, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226821