DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries

  • Khan, Hafiz (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Saxena, Anshul (Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University) ;
  • Perisetti, Abhilash (School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Rafiq, Aamrin (Department of Computer Science, Texas Tech University) ;
  • Gabbidon, Kemesha (School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Mende, Sarah (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Lyuksyutova, Maria (School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Quesada, Kandi (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Blakely, Summre (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Torres, Tiffany (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) ;
  • Afesse, Mahlet (Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center)
  • Published : 2016.12.01

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a worldwide public health concern and is the most prevalent type of cancer in women in the United States. This study concerned the best fit of statistical probability models on the basis of survival times for nine state cancer registries: California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington. Materials and Methods: A probability random sampling method was applied to select and extract records of 2,000 breast cancer patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for each of the nine state cancer registries used in this study. EasyFit software was utilized to identify the best probability models by using goodness of fit tests, and to estimate parameters for various statistical probability distributions that fit survival data. Results: Statistical analysis for the summary of statistics is reported for each of the states for the years 1973 to 2012. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, and Chi-squared goodness of fit test values were used for survival data, the highest values of goodness of fit statistics being considered indicative of the best fit survival model for each state. Conclusions: It was found that California, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, New Mexico, and Washington followed the Burr probability distribution, while the Dagum probability distribution gave the best fit for Michigan and Utah, and Hawaii followed the Gamma probability distribution. These findings highlight differences between states through selected sociodemographic variables and also demonstrate probability modeling differences in breast cancer survival times. The results of this study can be used to guide healthcare providers and researchers for further investigations into social and environmental factors in order to reduce the occurrence of and mortality due to breast cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Co-Clarke CA, Keegan THM, Yang J, et al (2012). Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover. J Natl Cancer Inst, 104, 1094-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs264
  2. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A (2014). Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21203
  3. EasyFit (2015). Distribution fitting made easy, mathwave-data analysis & simulation, version 5.5, retrieved on July 20, 2015 from http://www.mathwave.com/easyfit-distribution-fitting.html.
  4. Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA (2015). Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA, 313, 165. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17322
  5. Kwan ML, John EM, Caan BJ, et al (2014). Obesity and mortality after breast cancer by Race/Ethnicity: The California breast cancer survivorship consortium. Am J Epidemiol, 179, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt233
  6. Khan HMR, Ibrahimou B, Gabbidon K, et al (2014). a. statistical estimates from black non-Hispanic female breast cancer data. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.1
  7. Khan HMR, Saxena A, Gabbidon K, Ross E, Shrestha A (2014), b. Statistical applications for the prediction of white Hispanic breast cancer survival. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 5571-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5571
  8. Khan HMR, Saxena A, Gabbidon K, Stewart TSJ, Bhatt C (2014). c. Survival analysis for white non-Hispanic female breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 4049-54. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.9.4049
  9. Khan HMR, Saxena A, Vera V, et al (2014). d. black Hispanic and black non-Hispanic breast cancer survival data Analysis with half-normal model application. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.1
  10. Ning J, Peng S, Ueno N, et al (2015). Has racial difference in cause-specific death improved in older patients with late-stage breast cancer?. Ann Oncol, 26, 2161-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv330
  11. Ooi SL, Martinez ME, Li CI (2011). Disparities in breast cancer characteristics and outcomes by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 127, 729-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1191-6
  12. SEER (2010). Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program (www.seer.cancer.gov) research data (1973-2009), national cancer institute, DCCPS, surveillance research program. [Accessed July 10, 2013].
  13. Siegel R, Desantis C, Virgo K, et al (2013). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics , 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 62, 220-41.
  14. Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A (2015). Cancer statistics , 2015 . CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21254
  15. Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Clark AS, et al (2013). Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer. JAMA, 310, 389. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.8272
  16. SPSS (2015). Statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), IBM Inc., Retrieved on February 15, 2015 from http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/spss-statistics