DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does intrauterine injection of low-molecular-weight heparin improve the clinical pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection?

  • Kamel, Ahmed Mohamed (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University) ;
  • El-Faissal, Yahia (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University) ;
  • Aboulghar, Mona (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University) ;
  • Mansour, Ragaa (Egyptian IVF and ET Center) ;
  • Serour, Gamal I (Egyptian IVF and ET Center) ;
  • Aboulghar, Mohamed (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University)
  • Received : 2016.08.21
  • Accepted : 2016.10.31
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Objective: Heparin can modulate proteins, and influence processes involved in implantation and trophoblastic development. This study aimed to assess the improvement of clinical pregnancy and implantation rates after local intrauterine injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods: A randomised case/control design was followed in women scheduled for ICSI. The study arm was injected with intrauterine LMWH during mock embryo transfer immediately following the ovum pickup procedure, while the control arm was given an intrauterine injection with a similar volume of tissue culture media. Side effects, the clinical pregnancy rate, and the implantation rate were recorded. Results: The pregnancy rate was acceptable (33.9%) in the LMWH arm with no significant reported side effects, confirming the safety of the intervention. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates between both groups (p= 0.182 and p= 0.096, respectively). The odds ratio of being pregnant after intrauterine injection with LMWH compared to the control group was 0.572 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.22), while the risk ratio was 0.717 (95% CI, 0.46-1.13; p= 0.146). No statistical significance was found between the two groups in other factors affecting implantation, such as day of transfer (p= 0.726), number of embryos transferred (p= 0.362), or embryo quality. Conclusion: Intrauterine injection of LMWH is a safe intervention, but the dose used in this study failed to improve the outcome of ICSI. Based on its safety, further research involving modification of the dosage and/or the timing of administration could result in improved ICSI success rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Linhardt RJ, Wang HM, Ampofo SA. New methodologies in heparin structure analysis and the generation of LMW heparins. Adv Exp Med Biol 1992;313:37-47.
  2. Xu X, Ding J, Rao G, Shen J, Prinz RA, Rana N, et al. Estradiol induces heparanase-1 expression and heparan sulphate proteoglycan degradation in human endometrium. Hum Reprod 2007;22:927-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del483
  3. Germeyer A, Klinkert MS, Huppertz AG, Clausmeyer S, Popovici RM, Strowitzki T, et al. Expression of syndecans, cell-cell interaction regulating heparan sulfate proteoglycans, within the human endometrium and their regulation throughout the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2007;87:657-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1526
  4. Nelson SM, Greer IA. The potential role of heparin in assisted conception. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:623-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn031
  5. Poehlmann TG, Fitzgerald JS, Meissner A, Wengenmayer T, Schleussner E, Friedrich K, et al. Trophoblast invasion: tuning through LIF, signalling via Stat3. Placenta 2005;26 Suppl A:S37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2005.01.007
  6. Fluhr H, Spratte J, Ehrhardt J, Steinmuller F, Licht P, Zygmunt M. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins modulate the decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2581-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.025
  7. Akhtar MA, Sur S, Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Thornton J, Quenby S, et al. Heparin for assisted reproduction: summary of a Cochrane review. Fertil Steril 2015;103:33-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.005
  8. Mansour R, Tawab N, Kamal O, El-Faissal Y, Serour A, Aboulghar M, et al. Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 2011;96:1370-4.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.044
  9. Mansour R, Fahmy I, Tawab NA, Kamal A, El-Demery Y, Aboulghar M, et al. Electrical activation of oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled randomized study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.017
  10. Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Nicoletti A, Pontes A, Oliveira JB, et al. Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009;7:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-36
  11. Potdar N, Gelbaya TA, Konje JC, Nardo LG. Adjunct low-molecular-weight heparin to improve live birth rate after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:674-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt032
  12. Urman B, Ata B, Yakin K, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, et al. Luteal phase empirical low molecular weight heparin administration in patients with failed ICSI embryo transfer cycles: a randomized open-labeled pilot trial. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1640-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep086
  13. Tamada H, Higashiyama C, Takano H, Kawate N, Inaba T, Sawada T. The effects of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor on preimplantation-embryo development and implantation in the rat. Life Sci 1999;64:1967-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00128-9
  14. Constancia M, Hemberger M, Hughes J, Dean W, Ferguson-Smith A, Fundele R, et al. Placental-specific IGF-II is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth. Nature 2002;417:945-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00819
  15. Stevenson JL, Choi SH, Varki A. Differential metastasis inhibition by clinically relevant levels of heparins: correlation with selectin inhibition, not antithrombotic activity. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(19 Pt 1):7003-11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1131
  16. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1796-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199906103402304
  17. Fluhr H, Krenzer S, Stein GM, Stork B, Deperschmidt M, Wallwiener D, et al. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha sensitize primarily resistant human endometrial stromal cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Cell Sci 2007;120:4126-33. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.009761
  18. Fluhr H, Carli S, Deperschmidt M, Wallwiener D, Zygmunt M, Licht P. Differential effects of human chorionic gonadotropin and decidualization on insulin-like growth factors-I and -II in human endometrial stromal cells. Fertil Steril 2008;90(4 Suppl):1384-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1357
  19. Fawzy M, El-Refaeey AA. Does combined prednisolone and low molecular weight heparin have a role in unexplained implantation failure? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289:677-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3020-8
  20. Qublan H, Amarin Z, Dabbas M, Farraj AE, Beni-Merei Z, Al-Akash H, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of recurrent IVF-ET failure and thrombophilia: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008;11:246-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270801995431
  21. Berker B, Taskin S, Kahraman K, Taskin EA, Atabekoglu C, Sonmezer M. The role of low-molecular-weight heparin in recurrent implantation failure: a prospective, quasi-randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2499-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.033

Cited by

  1. Efficacy of low‐molecular‐weight heparin on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy in non‐thrombophilic women: a meta‐analysis vol.97, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13359