DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on selection of educational service quality's priority with TOPSIS method

TOPSIS방법을 이용한 교육서비스품질 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Min-Kyeong (Department of Industrial Management Engineering, MYONGJI University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Sik (Department of Industrial Management Engineering, MYONGJI University)
  • 김민경 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 강경식 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.20
  • Accepted : 2016.12.22
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

This research determined priority of quality improvement of public institution's education service by using ASC for importance and applying Topsis, a multi-standard decision-making method simplifying various attributes and scales of evaluation items and deciding the comparative priority for satisfaction and discussed the differences so as to measure the quality of public institution's educational service and examine the priority of education service' quality improvement. This research classified the characteristics of quality improvement. As a result, it's significant to suggest positive direction and method to improve satisfaction and education service's quality from an angle of demander by analyzing educational satisfaction of education service quality of public education institution and effects on the following improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim U-in, (2008), 'An analysis of the relationship among the educational service quality, organizational factors, educational satisfaction and preference of general high schools', Master's thesis of educational graduate school, Yonsei Uniiv.
  2. Sim Su-jin, (2009), 'An analysis on the relationship between organizational level of educational service quality and school educational satisfaction that middle school students recognize', Master's thesis of educational graduate school, Yonsei Univ.
  3. Jung Ki-soo, (2011), 'An analysis on decisive factors of studying satisfaction of adult leaners by educational service quality and studying motivation', 'Study on lifelong education. BHRD', 7(1) : 1-22.
  4. Chae Yun-soo(1999). 'A positive study on measurement of educational service quality :focusing on commercial high schools', Doctoral thesis of graduate school, Dongkook Univ.
  5. Duke, C. R., & Persia, M. A.(1996), "Performance-Importance Analysis of Escorted Tour Evaluations", Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 3 : 207-223.
  6. Hawes, Jon, M, and George Glisan, (1993), "A marketing Approach to Student Evaluation of a Department of Marketing." American Marketing Assocation : 159-163
  7. Heung- Yeop Jang, HaeGeun Song, Young T. Park, (2012), "Determining the Importance Values Qualit y Attributes Using ASC", J Korean Soc Quality Manag, 40(4):589-598. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.4.589
  8. Kyungmee O. Kim, (2007), "Determining the Importance of Customer Attributes with Kano's Model", J Korean Soc Quality Manag, 35(4):38-51.
  9. Parauram, A., & V. A. Zeithaml, & L. L. Berry(1985), "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research", Journal of Marketing, 49 : 41-50.
  10. Robertshaw, W.(1995), " Using an objective sales point measure to incorporate elements of the Kano model into QFD", Transactions from the 7th Symposium on QFD, Novi, MI, :201-216.
  11. Sung-Uk Lim,Young-Taek Park,, (2010), " Potential Customer Satisfaction Improvement Index based on Kano Model ", Journal of the Korean society for quality management , 38(2):248-261.
  12. Taioun Kim,(2012), " Analysis of Characteristics of Smart Phone Using Modified Kano Model", Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 35(1):55-65. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2012.35.4.55
  13. Timko, M., (1993), "An experiment in continuous analysis", Center for Qquality of Management Journal, 2(4):17-20.
  14. Yong-Wook Cho,"Propose new methodology based on Kano's Model", Journal of the Korea Safety Management& Science, 15(1)
  15. Yoon Jae Wook, Lee Hee Young, (2009), "An Empirical Comparative Analysis Between Kano and Improved Kano Methods", Journal of the Korean society for quality management, 37(4):31-42.
  16. Zeithaml,V.A.(1988), "Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A Model and Systemsis of Evidence,", Journal of Marketing, 52(5):16-23.

Cited by

  1. TOPSIS를 이용한 부산항과 상해항의 터미널 경쟁력에 관한 연구 vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2017.06.33.2.19