DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision in clinical T2N0 rectal cancer

  • Shin, Young Seob (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Yong sik (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Seok-Byung (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Chang Sik (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Won (Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Heung Moon (Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jin-hong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Seung Do (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Wook (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Eun Kyung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin Cheon (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jong Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.12
  • 심사 : 2016.08.30
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30

초록

Purpose: To investigate whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) followed by local excision (LE) is feasible approach in clinical T2N0 rectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Patients who received PCRT and LE because of clinical T2 rectal cancer within 7 cm from anal verge between January 2006 and June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. LE was performed in case of a good clinical response after PCRT. Patients' characteristics, treatment record, tumor recurrence, and treatment-related complications were reviewed at a median follow-up of 49 months. Results: All patients received transanal excision or transanal minimally invasive surgery. Of 34 patients, 19 patients (55.9%) presented pathologic complete response (pCR). The 3-year local recurrence-free survival and disease free-survival were 100.0% and 97.1%, respectively. There was no recurrence among the patients with pCR. Except for 1 case of grade 4 enterovesical fistula, all other late complications were mild and self-limiting. Conclusion: PCRT followed by an LE might be feasible as an alternative to total mesorectal excision in good responders with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chessin DB, Enker W, Cohen AM, et al. Complications after preoperative combined modality therapy and radical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer: a 14-year experience from a specialty service. J Am Coll Surg 2005;200:876-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.027
  2. Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6199-206. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.14.779
  3. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, et al. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:280-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6456
  4. Doornebosch PG, Zeestraten E, de Graaf EJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer: size matters! Surg Endosc 2012;26:551-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1918-4
  5. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:200-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6147-7
  6. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, et al. The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:998-1000.
  7. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 2009;373:811-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0
  8. Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1926-33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836
  9. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5124-30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467
  10. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2012;99:918-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8702
  11. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:835-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8
  12. Fokas E, Liersch T, Fietkau R, et al. Tumor regression grading after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma revisited: updated results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1554-62. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3769
  13. Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Chow OS, et al. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1537-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00215-6
  14. Bujko K, Richter P, Smith FM, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer with immediate radical re-operation for poor responders: a prospective multicentre study. Radiother Oncol 2013;106:198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.005
  15. Yu CS, Yun HR, Shin EJ, et al. Local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in advanced rectal cancer: a national multicenter analysis. Am J Surg 2013;206:482-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.042
  16. Stipa F, Picchio M, Burza A, Soricelli E, Vitelli CE. Long-term outcome of local excision after preoperative chemoradiation for ypT0 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:1245-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000221
  17. Noh JM, Park W, Kim JS, et al. Outcome of local excision following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for clinically T2 distal rectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 12-06). Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:243-9. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.3.243
  18. Debove C, Guedj N, Tribillon E, Maggiori L, Zappa M, Panis Y. Local excision of low rectal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy: is it safe for all patients with suspicion of complete tumor response? Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:853-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2546-1
  19. Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:19-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003840050072
  20. Juul T, Battersby NJ, Christensen P, et al. Validation of the English translation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Dis 2015;17:908-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12952
  21. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:1130-9.
  22. Bryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, Thaha MA, Chan CL. Anterior resection syndrome. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:e403-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70236-X
  23. You YN, Baxter NN, Stewart A, Nelson H. Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg 2007;245:726-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000252590.95116.4f
  24. Zhao RS, Wang H, Zhou ZY, Zhou Q, Mulholland MW. Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:388-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000022
  25. Joye I, Deroose CM, Vandecaveye V, Haustermans K. The role of diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of pathologic complete response after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2014;113:158-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.026
  26. Hanly AM, Ryan EM, Rogers AC, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of Rectal cancer ReImaging pOst Neoadjuvant (MERRION) Therapy. Ann Surg 2014;259:723-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828f6c91
  27. Guillem JG, Ruby JA, Leibold T, et al. Neither FDG-PET Nor CT can distinguish between a pathological complete response and an incomplete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective study. Ann Surg 2013;258:289-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318277b625
  28. Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2212-23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5
  29. Park JS, Jang YJ, Choi GS, et al. Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:32-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000004
  30. Kim DW, Kim DY, Kim TH, et al. Is T classification still correlated with lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer? Cancer 2006;106:1694-700. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21794
  31. Read TE, Andujar JE, Caushaj PF, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: histologic response of the primary tumor predicts nodal status. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:825-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0535-x
  32. Vendrely V, Rullier E, Rouanet P, et al. Local excision versus total mesorectal excision in patients with good response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for T2-T3 low rectal cancer: preliminary results of the GRECCAR 2 randomized phase 3 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:S20.
  33. Yeo SG, Kim DY, Kim TH, et al. Local excision following preoperative chemoradiotherapy-induced downstaging for selected cT3 distal rectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010;40:754-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyq062
  34. Merkel S, Mansmann U, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P. Time to locoregional recurrence after curative resection of rectal carcinoma is prolonged after neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:123-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02110.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Clinical utility of pretreatment prediction of chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer: a review vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-017-0082-x
  2. Predictive value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 related to downstaging to stage 0–I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s166417
  3. Oncologic Outcome and Morbidity in the Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision: A Multi-institutional and Case-matched Control Study vol.269, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002443
  4. Predictive value of changes in the level of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vol.22, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15355