DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Optimization of Atria with Monitor Skylight for Assessing Spatial Daylight Autonomy & Annual Solar Exposure

sDA와 ASE 일조지표 적용 Monitor형 아트리움 조도환경 최적설계

  • 박정대 (경기대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 이윤경 (경기대학교 일반대학원 건축학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.03
  • Accepted : 2016.05.24
  • Published : 2016.05.30

Abstract

With the increased simulation applications for assessing daylighting environment in buildings, a diversity of possibility exists for optimizing the performance of buildings. This study focuses on daylight performance assessments in adjoining spaces with different proportions to improve daylighting of atrium buildings. We investigates daylight metrics of central atrium type with monitor skylight. Climate-Based Daylight Modeling (CBDM) is applied as the assessment strategy and Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Solar Exposure (ASE) of LEED v.4(2013) are adopted as the dynamic daylight metrics to compare the results. The DIVA plug-in for Rhinoceros/Grasshopper as the parametric design tool is used for validation to effectively calculate daylight metrics using the Radiance/Daysim engine. In terms of the Well Index, Clearstory Height, Ceiling Height and Well Surface Reflectance, the variations of daylight level in the adjoining rooms have been analysed and some design strategies for supporting preliminary design decisions are presented. It is found that the optimized result of clerestory height for providing the surfficient daylighting in the atrium adjacent spaces is 3.66M.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 경기대학교 대학원

References

  1. Baker, N., Steemers, K., & Franchiotti, A. (Eds.) (1993). Daylighting in Architecture, A European Reference Book. James & James, London.
  2. Calcagni, B., & Paroncini, M. (2004). Daylight factor prediction in atria building designs. Solar Energy, 76 (6), 669-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.01.009
  3. DIVA for Rhino3D, 2015, 06.
  4. Du, J., & Sharples, S. (2011a). Assessing and predicting average daylight factors of adjoining spaces in atrium buildings under overcast sky, Building and Environment https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.020
  5. Du, J., & Sharples, S. (2011b). The variation of daylight levels across atrium walls: Reflectance distribution and well geometry effects under overcast sky conditions, Solar Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.05.015
  6. Erlendsson, O. (2014). Daylight Optimization: A Parametric Study of Atrium Design, KTH
  7. Fontoynont, M., Laforgue, P., Mitanchey, R., Aizlewood, M., Butt, J., Carroll, W., Hitchock, R., Erhorn, H., De Boer, J., DirksMoller, M., Michel, L., Paule, B., Scartezzini, J. L., Bodart, M., & Roy, G. (1999). IEA SHC Task 21: Validation of daylighting computer programs, ECBCS
  8. Hu, J., Place, W., & Malekafzali, A. (2014). Using Diva for Assessing Climate-Based LEED Daylight Credit, American Solar Energy Society Conference, San Francisco, CA.
  9. Illuminating Engineering Society (2012). IES LM-83-12- Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE).
  10. Iyer, U. (1990). Daylighting in Atrium Spaces, UBC
  11. Kim, K., & Boyer, L. (1986). Development of daylight prediction methods for atrium design. International Day-light Conference Proceedings II, November, Long Beach, CA, pp. 345-359.
  12. Kim, J., Choi, A., & Song, K. (2012). Thermal and Daylight performance data in four-sided atria according to shape and canopy system, KSLES
  13. Lee, J. (2011). Daylight Performance of Four-sided atria having different well configurations and canopy systems, Thesis, Hanyang Univ.
  14. Lee, J., Lee J., & Song, K. (2011). Evaluation of Daylight performance of Four-Side atria with different well configuration and canopy transmittance, KSLES
  15. Li, D., Cheung, A., Chow, S., & Lee, E. (2014). Study of daylight data and lighting energy savings for atrium corridors with lighting dimming controls, Energy Build, 72 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.027
  16. Liu, A., Navvab, M., & Jones, J. (1991). Geometric shape index for daylight distribution variations in atrium spaces. Solar World Conference Proceedings, Denver, CO.
  17. Mardaljevic, J. (2001). The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Lighting Research and Technology, 33, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/136578280103300209
  18. Mardaljevic, J. (2004). Verification of program accuracy for illuminance modeling: assumptions, methodology and an examination of conflicting findings. Lighting Research & Technology, 36, 217-242. https://doi.org/10.1191/1477153504li120oa
  19. Mardaljevic, J. (2006). Examples of climate-based daylight modelling, CIBSE National Conference 2006: Engineering the Future, Oval Cricket Ground, London, UK
  20. Mohsenin, M., & Hu, J. (2015). Assessing daylight performance in atrium buildings by using climate based daylight modeling, Solar Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.011
  21. Samant, S., & Medjdoub, B. (2006). Reflectance Distributions and Atrium Daylight Levels: a Comparison between Physical Scale Model and Radiance Simulated Study, Thesis, School of the Built Environment, Univ. Nottingham
  22. Swedish Standards Institute (2003). SS-EN 12464-1:2002 Light and Lighting
  23. Thanachareonkit, A. (2008). Comparing Physical and Virtual Methods for Daylight Performance Modelling including Complex Fenestration Systems. PhD Thesis, EPFL, Switzerland.
  24. US Green Building Council (2013). LEED v4: Daylight. Technical Report, US Green Building Council
  25. Wienold, J., & Christoffersen, J. (2006). Evaluation methods and eevelopment of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras, Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
  26. Yu, H., Lee, J., & Song, K. (2010). Evaluation of the daylight performance of adjacent interior spaces in 4-sided atrium according to the height ratio of atrium & the transmittance of atrium canopy, KIEAE