Advances in Energy Research

  • 제4권2호
  • /
  • Pages.121-146
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2287-6316(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6324(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wind and solar energy: a comparison of costs and environmental impacts

  • Carnevale, Ennio A. (Industrial Engineering Department, University of Florence) ;
  • Lombardi, Lidia (Niccolo Cusano University) ;
  • Zanchi, Laura (Industrial Engineering Department, University of Florence)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.28
  • 심사 : 2016.03.12
  • 발행 : 2016.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study is concerned with the analysis of two renewable technologies for electric energy production: wind energy and photovoltaic energy. The two technologies were assessed and compared by economic point of view, by using selected indicators characterized by a clear calculation approach, requirement of information easy to be collected, clear, but even complete, interpretation of results. The used economic indicators are Levelized Cost of Energy, $CO_2$ abatement cost and fossil fuel saving specific cost; these last two specifically aimed at evaluating the different capabilities that renewable technologies have to cut down direct $CO_2$ emissions and to avoid fossil fuel extraction. The two technologies were compared also from the environmental point of view by applying Life Cycle Assessment approach and using the environmental impact categories from the Eco-indicator'95 method. The economic analysis was developed by taking into account different energy system sizes and different geographic areas in order to compare different European conditions (Italy, Germany and Denmark) in term of renewable resource availability and market trend. The environmental analysis was developed comparing two particular types of PV and wind plants, respectively residential and micro-wind turbine, located in Italy. According to the three calculated economic indicators, the wind energy emerged as more favorable than PV energy. From the environmental point of view, both the technologies are able to provide savings for almost all the considered environmental impact categories. The proposed approach, based on the use of economic and environmental indicators may be useful in supporting the policies and the decision making procedures concerned with the promotion and use of renewables, in reference to the specific geographic, economic and temporal conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Al-Behadili, S.H. and El-Osta, W.B. (2015), "Life cycle assessment of dernah (Libya) wind farm", Renew. Energy, 83, 1227-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.041
  2. Ardente, F., Beccali, M., Cellura, M. and Brano, V. L. (2008), "Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an italian wind farm", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 12(1), 200-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.013
  3. Branker, K., Pathak, M.J.M. and Pearce, J.M. (2011), "A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(9), 4470-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104
  4. Carnevale, E., Carrozza, P., Ferroni, G.C., Ferrari, G.F., Morbidelli, G. and Orru, R. (2014), "Verso una politica energetica integrata. Le energie rinnovabili nel prisma della comparazione", Vol. 1, Editoriale Scientifica.
  5. Carnevale, E., Lombardi, L. and Zanchi, L. (2014), "Life cycle assessment of solar energy systems: comparison of photovoltaic and water thermal heater at domestic scale", Energy, 77, 434-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.028
  6. Cartografia di base DEAGOSTINI (2015), "Atlante Eolico Interattivo", http://atlanteeolico.rseweb.it/viewer.htm.
  7. de Wild-Scholten, M.J., Alsema, E.A., Ter Horst, E.W., Bachler, M. and Fthenakis, V.M. (2006), "A cost and environmental impact comparison of grid-connected rooftop and ground-based PV systems", Proceedings of the 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 3167-73.
  8. ENEA (2011), "Quaderno. Energia Eolica", http://www.enea.it/it/comunicare-la-ricerca/documenti/quadernienergia/energiaeolica.pdf.
  9. ENEA (2015), "Atlante Italiano Della Radiazione Solare", http://www.solaritaly.enea.it/.
  10. EurObserv'ER (2014), The State of Renewable Energies in Europe, 14th EurObserv'ER Report, http://www.eurobserv-er.org/pdf/annual-overview-2014-en/.
  11. European Commission (2010), "COM (2010) 639 Final 'Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the commi ttee of the regions enrrgy 2020", A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy.
  12. European Commission (2013), "COM(2013) 196 Final: 'Communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council", Building the Single Market for Green Products Facilitating Better Information on the Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations.
  13. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, and Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011), International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook, Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European Context, First edition vols., Publications Office, Luxembourg.
  14. European Environment Agency (2015), "$CO_{2}$ (g) per KWh in 2009 (electricity Only)", http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/co2-electricity-g-per-kwh#tab-european-data.
  15. European Photovoltaic Industry Association (2011), "Solar Generation 6. Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Empowering the World", http://www.epia.org/uploads/tx_epiapublications/Solar_Generation_6__2011_Full_report_Final.pdf.
  16. European Solar Thermal Technology Panel of the European Technology Platform on Renewable Heating and Cooling (RHC-Platform). Strategic Research Priorities for Solar Thermal Technology (2012), http://www.rhc-platform.org/fileadmin/Publications/Solar_Thermal_SRP_single_page.pdf.
  17. Fthenakis, V.M. and Kim, H.C. (2011a), "Photovoltaics: life-cycle analyses", Prog. Sol. Energy, 85(8), 1609-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.002
  18. Fthenakis, V.M., Kim, H.C., Frischknecht, R., Raugei, M., Sinha, P. and Stucki, M. (2011b), "Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems", International Energy Agency (IEA) PVPS Task 12, Report T12-02:2011.
  19. Garrett, P. and Ronde, K. (2011), "Life cycle assessment of electricity production from a V100-1.8 MW gridstreamer wind plant", Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Randers, Dnemark.
  20. Goedkoop, M. (2012), "The Eco-Indicator 95", Final Report 353194/1711, PRe consultants.
  21. Graus, W. and Worrell, E. 2009), "Trend in efficiency and capacity of fossil power generation in the EU", Energy Policy, 37(6), 2147-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.034
  22. Guezuraga, B., Zauner, R. and Polz, W. (2012), "Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines", Renew. Energy, 37(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.008
  23. Gurzenich, D., Mathur, J., Bansal, N.K. and Wagner, H.J. (1999), "Cumulative energy demand for selected renewable energy technologies", Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 4(3), 143-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979448
  24. Hang, Y., Qu, M. and Zhao, F. (2012), "Economic and environmental life cycle analysis of solar hot water systems in the United States", Energy Build., 45, 181-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.057
  25. Held, M. (2009), "Life cycle assessment of CdTe module recycling", Proceeding of the 24th EU PVSEC Conference, Hamburg, Germany.
  26. Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., Rebitzer, G., Ciroth, A. and SETAC-Europe, eds. (2008), Environmental Life Cycle Costing, CRC Press, Pensacola, Fl, Boca Raton.
  27. IRENA (2012a), Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Solar Photovoltaics, Volume 1: Power Sector, Issue 4/5, International Renewable Energy Agency.
  28. IRENA (2012b), Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Wind Power, Volume 1: Power Sector, Issue 5/5, International Renewable Energy Agency.
  29. IRENA (2012c), Summary for Policy Makers: Renewable Power Generation Costs, International Renewable Energy Agency.
  30. ISO 14040 (2006), Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework.
  31. ISO/TS 14067 (2013), Greenhouse Gases-Carbon Footprint of Products-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication, http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=59521.
  32. Jungbluth, N., Stucki, M. and Frischknecht, R. (2009), "Photovoltaic. In Dones, R., (Ed.) et alI., Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen: Grundlagen Fur Den okologischen Vergleich von Energiesystem Und Den Einbezung von Energiesystem in Okobilazen Fur Die Schiweiz", Ecoinvent Report No. 6-XII, Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
  33. Kabakian, V., McManus, M.C. and Harajli, H. (2015), "Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8 kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system", Appl. Energy, 154, 428-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.125
  34. Kabir, M.R., Rooke, B., Dassanayake, G.M. and Fleck, B.A. (2012), "Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation", Renew. Energy, 37(1), 133-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.003
  35. Koroneos, C.J. and Nanaki, E.A. (2012), "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a solar water heater", J. Clean. Product., 37, 154-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.001
  36. Lang, P. (2011), "$CO_{2}$ abatement cost with electricity generation options in Australia", Citeseer, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.361.1528&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  37. Marimuthu, C. and Kirubakaran, V. (2013), "Carbon pay back period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: a critical review", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 23, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.045
  38. Martinez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jimenez, E. and Blanco, J. (2009), "Life cycle assessment of a multimegawatt wind turbine", Renew. Energy, 34(3), 667-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.020
  39. Muller, A., Wambach, K. and Alsema, E. (2006), "Life cycle analysis of solar module recycling process", Materials Research Society 0895-G03-07.1.
  40. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2015), NREL: Energy Analysis - Levelized Cost of Energy Calculator, http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech_lcoe.html.
  41. Nawaz, I. and Tiwari, G.N. (2006), "Embodied energy analysis of photovoltaic (PV) system based on Macro- and Micro-Level", Energy Policy, 34(17), 3144-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.018
  42. Nuclear Energy Agency (2005), International Energy Agency. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, 2005 Update, https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:37044263.
  43. Pandey, D., Agrawal, M. and Pandey, J.S. (2010), "Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation", Environ. Monit. Assess., 178(1-4), 135-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y
  44. Peng, J., Lu, L. and Yang, H. (2013), "Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 19, 255-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035
  45. Raugei, M., Bargigli, S. and Ulgiati, S. (2007), "Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules: CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si", Energy, 3, 1310-1318.
  46. REN21 (2012), Renewables 2012 Global Status Report, Paris: REN21 Secretariat, http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/GSR2012_low%20res_FINAL.pdf.
  47. Riccardo, B. and Corrado, A. (2005), "Evaluation of technical improvements of photovoltaic systems through life cycle assessment methodology", Energy, 30(7), 952-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.07.011
  48. Schau, E.M., Traverso, M. Lehmann, A. and Finkbeiner, M. (2011), "Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment-a case study of remanufactured alternators", Sustainability, 3(12), 2268-88. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3112268
  49. Short, W., Packey, D.J., Holt, T. and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (1995), A Manual for the Economic Evaluation of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technologies, University Press of the Pacific, http://large.stanford.edu/publications/coal/references/troughnet/market/docs/5173.pdf.
  50. Turconi, R., Boldrin, A. and Astrup, T. (2013), "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 28, 555-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013
  51. Vargas, A.V., Zenon, E., Oswald, U., Islas, J.M., Guereca, L.P. and Manzini, F.L. (2015), "Life cycle assessment: a case study of two wind turbines used in Mexico", Appl. Therm. Eng., 75, 1210-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.056
  52. Wesselink, B. and Deng, Y. (2009), "Sectoral emission reduction potentials and economic costs for climate change (SERPEC-CC)", Summary Report, Ecofys.
  53. Xue, B., Ma, Z., Geng, Y., Heck, P., Ren, W., Tobias, M., Maas, A., Jiang, P., Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. and Fujita, T. (2015), "A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 41, 338-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.056

피인용 문헌

  1. Prioritizing the locations for hydrogen production using a hybrid wind-solar system: A case study vol.5, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eri.2017.5.2.107
  2. Optimal location planning to install wind turbines for hydrogen production: A case study vol.5, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eri.2017.5.2.147
  3. Localization of solar-hydrogen power plants in the province of Kerman, Iran vol.5, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eri.2017.5.2.179