참고문헌
- Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 2013;42:20-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182546e79
- Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.049
- Caraway NP. Evolving role of FNA biopsy in diagnosing lymphoma: past, present, and future. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:389-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21551
- DeWitt J, Emerson RE, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2192-2202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1522-z
- Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02538-0
- Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1189-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053
- Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3733-3738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2957-9
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med 2009;3:e123-e130. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010123
- Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
- Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:889-897. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008
- Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
- Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:982-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022
- Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1129-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00177-X
- Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00099-C
- Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993;12:1293-1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780121403
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
- Higgins JP, Green S; Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
- Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:882-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016
- Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:321-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392
- Hucl T, Wee E, Anuradha S, et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy 2013;45:792-798. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344217
- Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, Wang AY, Stelow EB, Shami VM. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol 2014;42:751-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23116
- Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy 2014;46:1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377558
- Vanbiervliet G, Napoleon B, Saint Paul MC, et al. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2014;46:1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377559
- Paik WH, Park Y, Park do H, et al. Prospective evaluation of new 22 gauge endoscopic ultrasound core needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique for intra-abdominal solid masses. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:199-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000084
- Witt BL, Adler DG, Hilden K, Layfield LJ. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCor and EchoTip 22-gauge needle types. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:1069-1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.22971
- Berzosa M, Villa N, El-Serag HB, Sejpal DV, Patel KK. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2015;4:28-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.151320
- Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:909-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.001
- Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Maimone A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of small solid pancreatic lesions using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1586-1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3846-6
- Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, Padda MS, Murali-Dharan V, Aslanian HR. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1093-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.037
- Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DA, Michael H, Gress FG. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy 2009;41:445-448. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214643
- Yasuda I, Goto N, Tsurumi H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders: feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:397-404. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.350
- Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.032
- LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:475-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02863-3
피인용 문헌
- EUS elastography (strain ratio) and fractal-based quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions vol.87, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.031
- Review of the 2017 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscopic Ultrasound - Guided Sampling in Pancreaticobiliary Lesions vol.74, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2019.74.3.137
- Comparison between 22G aspiration and 22G biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_4_19
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come? vol.11, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.454
- Agreement on endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided tissue specimens: Comparing a 20‐G fine‐needle biopsy to a 25‐G fine‐needle aspiration needle among academic and non‐ vol.31, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13424
- New Devices for Endoscopic Treatments in Gastroenterology: A Narrative Review vol.21, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200221666200722145727
- Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle vol.12, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i9.266
- The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1159/000510730
- Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS‐FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy vol.49, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24645
- The bleeding risk after endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture of pancreatic masses vol.56, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2020.1863458
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis vol.9, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1381-7301