DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the biodegradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and PFOS alternatives

  • Choi, Bongin (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University College of Engineering) ;
  • Na, Suk-Hyun (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University College of Engineering) ;
  • Son, Jun-Hyo (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University College of Engineering) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Soo (Department of Chemistry, Changwon National University) ;
  • Ryu, Byung-Taek (Environmental Safety Center, Korea Environmental Corporation) ;
  • Byeon, Kyun-Suk (Department of Chemistry, Changwon National University) ;
  • Chung, Seon-Yong (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University College of Engineering)
  • Received : 2015.10.16
  • Accepted : 2016.01.29
  • Published : 2016.01.01

Abstract

Objectives In this study, we investigated the biodegradation features of 4 perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) alternatives developed at Changwon National University compared to those of PFOS. Methods Biodegradation testing was performed with microorganisms cultured in the good laboratory practice laboratory of the Korea Environment Corporation for 28 days following the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development guidelines for the testing of chemicals (Test No. 301 C). Results While $C_8F_{17}SO_3Na$, PFOS sodium salt was not degraded after 28 days, the 4 alternatives were biodegraded at the rates of 20.9% for $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$, 8.4% for $C_{17}F_9H_{25}S_2O_8Na_2$, 22.6% for $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, and 23.6% for $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}O_{13}S_3Na_3$. Conclusions $C_{25}F_{17}H_{32}S_3O_{13}Na_3$, $C_{23}F_{18}H_{28}S_2O_8Na_2$, and $C_{15}F_9H_{21}S_2O_8Na_2$ were superior to PFOS in terms of biodegradation rates and surface tension, and thus they were considered highly applicable as PFOS alternatives. Environmental toxicity, human toxicity, and economic feasibility of these compounds should be investigated prior to their commercialization.

Keywords

References

  1. Martin JW, Muir DC, Moody CA, Ellis DA, Kwan WC, Solomon KR, et al. Collection of airborne fluorinated organics and analysis by gas chromatography/chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2002;74(3):584-590. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac015630d
  2. Higgins CP, Field JA, Criddle CS, Luthy RG. Quantitative determination of perfluorochemicals in sediments and domestic sludge. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39(11):3946-3956. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048245p
  3. Suh C, Lee CK, Lee SR, Park MH, Lee JT, Son BC, et al. Concentration of PFOA and PFOS in whole blood and factors controlling their exposure among Koreans. J Environ Health Sci 2012:38(2):105-117 (Korean).
  4. Vijaykumar BV, Premkumar B, Jang K, Choi BI, Falck JR, Sheldrakee GN, et al. Environmentally benign perfluorooctanesulfonate alternatives using a Zn/CuI mediated Michael-type addition in imidazolium ionic liquids. Green Chem 2014;16(5):2406-2410. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC42642D