References
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "the social psychology of creativity". Westview press.
- An, I, J., Choi, S. G., & Noh, Y. H. (2014). A study on establishing creative zones and creative zone programming. The Journal of Society for Information Management, 31(2), 143-171.
- Bagley, C. A. (2012). What is a Makerspace? Creativity in the library, ALA Tech Source. Retrieved from http://www.alatechsource.org/blog/2012/12/what-is-amakerspace-creativity-in-the-library.html.
- Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76-107. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02
- Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer mediated change. In B. Nardi (Ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Birtchnell, T., & Urry, J. (2013). 3D, SF and the future, Futures(The journal of policy, planning and futures studies). Futures 50 (2013), 25-34.
- Bo, L., & Gang, W. (2014). Makerspace: practice and inspiration of library new format development. Information and Documentation Services, 1, 022.
- Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning-Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.
- Byun, M. K., Jo, J. H., & Cho, M. H. (2015). The analysis of learner's motivation and satisfaction with 3D printing in science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(5), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0877
- Byun, M. K., & Cho, M. H. (2016). Examining ways to support engineering students for choosing a project topic in interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.1.37
- Chi, T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
- Choi, I. H., & Choe, I. S. (2001). How can the new ideas be produced : A learning - Process approach to creativity on expert domain. Korean Journal of Psychology, 20(2), 409-428.
- Choi, Y. S., & Kim, G. J. (2014). 2030 Movement of chance. Seoul: Kimyoungsa.
- Choi, Y, H., Mun, D. Y., Gang, K. G., Lee, J. W., & Lee, J. H. (2008). The development and the effect of educational program based on STEM for the inventively gifted. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 8(2), 143-164.
- Choi, Y, H., Nho, J. A., Lee, M. H., Lee, B. W., Mun, D. Y., Gang, K. G., & Kim, D. H. (2012). The standard development of inventional contents for elementary, middle, and high school students. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 148-168.
- Colegrove, P. (2013). Editorial board thoughts: libraries as makerspace. Information Technology and Libraries, 32(1), 2-5. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v32i1.3793
- Reinertsen, D. (1997). Managing the design factory. Simon and Schuster.
- Edunet (2015, November 25). Imagine an infinite operating room school study for promoting creativity and imagination, Edunet. Retrieved from http://www.edunet.net/dsearch/search.jsp#none.
- Finney, & Joseph (2015, April 15). Microsoft Garage is a place where Microsoft employees can feel free to fail, Tools and space give talented people the right environment for invention. WinBeta.
- Foley, M. J. (2015, February 25). Microsoft opens Garage door, shows off experimental apps. Retrieved from CNet. http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoftopens- garage-door-shows-off-experimental-apps.
- Gardner, H. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.
- Goldman, D. (2012, October 10). Where microsoft geeks go to 'Do epic $#!+'. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/10/technology/microsoft-garage/index.html.
- Good, T., & Krull, J. (2013). Three makerspace models that work. American Libraries, 44(1), 45-47.
- Hong, S. G., & Park, H, Y. (2013). A study on the S&T infrastructure building for facilitating the people's participation in the creative economy. Policy Research, 1-110.
- Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hwang, S. J. (2014). Discussion of 'The method of entrepreneurship development through the invention education'. Creative invention Educational Conference, 2, 135-137.
- Hwang, S. J. (2014). Discussion of 'The method of entrepreneurship development through the invention education'. Creative invention Educational Conference, 2, 135-137.
- Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments, Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2, 215-239.
- Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Karakus, T. (2014). Practices and Potential of Activity Theory for Educational Technology Research. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer New York, 151-160.
- Kim, E. K. (2013). Creative Engineering Design. Seoul: Hanbit Academy.
- Kim, S, P., Byun, C. G., & Ha, H, H. (2014). Creativity and Entrepreneurship : What is The Relationship between Creativity and Entrepreneurship. Korean Management Consulting Review, 14(3), 67-78.
- Kim, S, W., Jung, Y, R., Woo, A, J., & Lee, H. J. (2012). Development of a theoretical model for STEAM education. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 32(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.388
- Kim, Y. J., & Nho, B. S. (2012). A study of entrepreneurship education effect on the self-leadership and entrepreneurship. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 23-31.
- Kim, Y. I., Choi, Y. H., Jeon, I, G., Lee, W. C., & Kwack, S. M. (2005). A study on the objective system and contents standards for an invention education through a school subject. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 24(3), 123-146.
- Kim, Y. O. (1996). Qualitative Research Methods and Design for Education and Research. Seoul: Muneumsa.
- Lee, I. (2008). Convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Godswin.
- Lee, K., & Oh, E. (2012). A study on the perception of curriculum for cultivating students' creativity in secondary school. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 6(1), 45-68.
- Lee, J. H., Yang, H. I., & Sun, J. Y. (2012). Korean science and technology innovation ODA strategy. Policy Research, 1-346.
- McCue, T. J. (2011). First public library to create a maker space. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2011/11/15/first-public-libraryto-create-a-maker-space.
- Milne, L. (2013). Nurturing the designerly thinking and design capabilities of five-year-olds: Technology in the new entrant classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9182-4
- Ministry of education (2014). 2015 released general remarks' highlights of the integrated curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/106888/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=339&boardSeq=56875.
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014). Endless imagining room operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_ id=1677&uid=4277&mod=document.
- Noh, Y. H. (2014). A study on Creating and managing "Makerspaces" in Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.053
- Park, G. Y., & Choi, H. S. (2011). A Study of teaching-learning practices in education center for the talented in invention. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 30(4), 281-300.
- Park. Y. S., Glenn. J., & Gorden, T. (2014). The UN Future Report 2045, Kyung-gi: Kyobo Book Centre.
- Pink, D. H. (2006). Whole new mind : why right-brainers will rule the future. Seoul: The Korea Economic Daily.
- Reinertsen, D. (1997). Managing the design factory. Simon and Schuster.
- Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, United States: Mariner Books.
- Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
- Seo, H, A., Cho, S. H., Kim, H. W., Jung, H. C., & Sohn, Y. A. (2002). Invention Education Content Standards Development. KIPO Research Reports.
- Sim, J. H., Lee, Y. L., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM Education, and Addressing the Issues Facing STEAM in the Korean Context. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(4), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709
- Sohn, S. J. (2013). Creative economy perspective intellectual property professionals demand outlook. Science and Technology Policy, (193), 72-88.
- Son, J. (2014). The method of Invention educational approaches in science education curriculum dimension when developed integrated curriculum. Korea Association for Gifted Children Alliance Conference, 2014(1), 103-110.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
- Winn, W. (2002). Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068530070
Cited by
- 대학도서관의 메이커 스페이스 도입방안 연구 vol.48, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.201709.259
- 학교내 무한상상실을 활용한 메이커교육 프로그램 적용이 초등학생의 창의적 문제해결력과 자기주도적 학습력에 미치는 효과 vol.40, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.55