References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629013
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
- Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
- Clough, M. P. (2013). Teaching about the nature of technology: Issues and pedagogical practices. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 345-369). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2013). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- De Vries, J., & De Vries, M. (2006). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers (Vol. 27). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
- Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
- Feibleman, J. K. (1961). Pure science, applied science, technology, engineering: An attempt at definitions. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/3100886
- Fleming, R. (1986). Adolescent reasoning in socio‐scientific issues part I: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230803
- Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. USA: University of Chicago Press.
- Grace, M. M., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1157-1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134848
- Hughes, T. P. (2012). The evolution of large technological Systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, T. Pinch, & D. G. Douglas (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 45-74). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- International Technology Education Association [ITEA] (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: ITEA.
- Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
- Kim, D., Mun, J., Lee, J., Song, C., & Park, J. (2013). The birth of modern engineers. Seoul: Ecolivres.
- Lee, H. (2015). Construction of nature of technology framework and its utilization for investigation of changes in college students' perception of nature of technology through SSI-based program. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ewha Womans University.
- Lee, H. & Lee, H. (2015). Analysis of students' socioscientific decision-making from the nature of technology perspectives. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 35(1), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0169
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
- National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. United States of America: University of Chicago Press.
- Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
- Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190203
- Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 545-558). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Rudolph, J. L. (2000). Reconsidering the 'nature of science' as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182628
- Sadler, T. D., (2009) Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science education, 88(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin's whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21013
- Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
- Volti, R. (2009). Society and Technological Change. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
- Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601068095
- Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875-2905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.698763
- Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis:Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.),Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 697-726).New York, NY: Routledge.
- Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It's debatable!: Using socioscientific issuesto develop scientific literacy K-12. Arlington, VA: National ScienceTeachers Association Press.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009).Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002).Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responsesto socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
Cited by
- 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 교육을 위한 교과교육학적 지식(SSI-PCK) 요소에 대한 탐색 vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539
- 공업계열 특성화고 학생들의 기술의 본성(NOT)에 대한 인식 탐구 - 과학기술사 수업을 중심으로 - vol.45, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.1.199
- 과학기술관련 사회쟁점에 대한 의사결정에서 나타나는 NOT 이해 수준의 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발 및 적용 vol.37, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0323
- Exploring the Perception Structure of Science Teachers on Basic Science, Applied Science, and Convergence Science vol.56, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.56.4.201712.487
- 기술의 본성(NOT) 개념 틀 제안 및 이공계 대학생들의 기술의 본성(NOT)에 대한 인식 탐구 vol.43, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.3.363
- 이공계 대학생의 사회적 책임감 함양을 위한 ENACT 모형의 개발과 교육적 함의 vol.23, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.6.3