DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Team Performance

정보기술과 교류기억시스템이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향

  • Mu Moung Cho Han (Department of Management Information Systems, KeiMyung University) ;
  • Choong Kwon Lee (Department of Management Information Systems, KeiMyung University) ;
  • Kyung Jin Cha (Department of Global Business, Kangwon National University)
  • 한무명초 (계명대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 이충권 (계명대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 차경진 (강원대학교 글로벌비즈니스학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.08
  • Accepted : 2016.12.23
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Today's organizations make a large investment in information technology (IT) that supports knowledge management. The perceived importance of transactive memory systems (TMS) is increasing in the aspect of team performance. This study aims to understand the mediating effect of knowledge sharing and usage from the perspective of the relationship between IT support for knowledge management and TMS for team performance. To this end, this study analyzes the survey responses obtained from 224 members of 37 different teams using IT support for knowledge management. The results are as follows. First, the effect of IT support on knowledge management was significant in TMS. Second, the mediating effect of IT support on knowledge management through TMS was higher than its direct effect on knowledge sharing and usage. Third, IT support for knowledge management had a greater effect on knowledge sharing than on knowledge usage. Fourth, the effect of TMS appeared to be ordered by tacit knowledge sharing, explicit knowledge sharing, tacit knowledge usage, and explicit knowledge usage. Fifth, the relationship of team performance with knowledge sharing and usage was significant in the order of tacit knowledge usage, tacit knowledge sharing, and explicit knowledge usage.

오늘날 조직은 팀으로 구성되어 있고 팀들의 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술에 많은 투자를 하고 있으며, 팀 성과를 높이기 위한 교류기억시스템의 활용에 관한 중요성도 증가하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술과 교류기억시스템이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 있어서 지식(형식지, 암묵지)의 공유 및 활용의 매개효과를 살펴보는 것이다. 이를 위해 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술을 사용하고 있는 다양한 업종의 근로자 37개 팀 224명 응답자의 자료를 사용하여 구조방정식으로 분석하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술은 교류기억시스템에 높은 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 둘째, 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술은 직접 지식(형식지, 암묵지) 공유 및 활용에 미치는 효과보다 교류기억시스템을 매개로 하는 것이 더 높은 효과가 있었다. 그리고 지식관리를 지원하는 정보기술은 지식 활용보다 공유에 더 높은 효과가 있었다. 셋째, 교류기억시스템은 암묵지 공유, 형식지 공유, 암묵지 활용, 형식지 활용 순으로 유의미하게 나타났다. 마지막으로 지식(형식지, 암묵지) 공유 및 활용과 팀 성과와의 관계에서 암묵지 활용, 암묵지 공유, 형식지 활용 순으로 유의미하게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강민형, 조직내 지식 공유 활성화를 위한 지식흐름도의 개발 (석사학위논문), 한국과학기술원, 1999.
  2. 강신철, 정철호, 한영희, 대학생과 실무자를 위한 경영정보시스템, 대경, 2015.
  3. 구동모, 연구방법론 = Research methodology, 학현사, 2013.
  4. 김인재, 설경환, "조직성과에 미치는 SPI 영향 요인에 관한 연구: 조직 성숙도의 조절효과 관점에서", 정보시스템연구, 제19권, 제2호, 2010, pp. 97-118. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2010.19.2.097
  5. 김진완, 이경진, 김유일, "지식공유 영향요인들이 형식지와 잠재지의 공유에 미치는 영향의 차이에 관한 연구", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제4권, 제3호, 2004, pp. 133-160.
  6. 박노국, 오준환, 전우천, 한동철, 지식경영, 이프레스, 서울, 2015.
  7. 왕봉지, 최상민, 문태수, "교류기억체계(TMS)와 지식활용이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 자동차 부품산업을 중심으로", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제14권, 제4호, 2014, pp. 41-63.
  8. 이순철, 사례로 본 지식경영의 이해, 삼성경제연구소, 1999.
  9. 이영찬, "사회적 자본, 지식경영, 그리고 조직성과 간의 인과관계", 정보시스템연구, 제16권, 제4호, 2007, pp. 223-242.
  10. 임희정, 지식근로자 팀 효과성의 통합 모델: 공유인지의 역할을 중심으로 (박사학위논문), 이화여자대학교, 2005.
  11. 정윤길, 이규만, "변혁적 리더십과 집단효능감 및 팀 유효성간의 관계: 공기업 구성원을 중심으로", 한국행정논집, 제19권, 제4호, 2007, pp. 1053-1073.
  12. 최상민, 문태수, "IT 역량과 조직성과의 영향 관계에서 IS 전략적 활용의 매개효과분석", 정보시스템연구, 제23권, 제2호, 2014, pp. 67-90. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2014.23.2.67
  13. Akgun, A. E., J. C. Byrne, H. Keskin, and G. S. Lynn, "Transactive memory system in new product development teams", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.53, No.1, 2006, pp. 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.857570
  14. Alavi, M. and A. Tiwana, "Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS", Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.53, No.12, 2002, pp. 1029-1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10107
  15. Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner, "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues", MIS Quarterly, Vol.5, No.1, 2001, pp. 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  16. Argote, L. and P. Ingram, "Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.82, No.1, 2000, pp. 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
  17. Argyres, N. S., "The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth" bomber", Organization Science, Vol.10, No.2, 1999, pp. 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.162
  18. Bock, G. W., R. W. Zmud, Y. G. Kim, and J. N. Lee, "Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate", MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, 2005, pp. 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
  19. Boland Jr, R. J., R. V. Tenkasi, and D. Te'eni, "Designing information technology to support distributed cognition", Organization Science, Vol.5, No.3, 1994, pp. 456-475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.456
  20. Carlile, P. R., "A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development", Organization Science, Vol.13, No.4, 2002, pp. 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
  21. Chin, W. W., "The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling", in G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1998, pp. 295-336.
  22. Choi, S. Y., H. Lee, and Y. Yoo, "The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study", MIS Quarterly, Vol.34, No.4, 2010, pp. 855-870. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750708
  23. Cummings, J. N., "Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization", Management Science, Vol.50, No.3, 2004, pp. 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
  24. Faraj, S. and L. Sproull, "Coordinating expertise in software development teams", Management Science, Vol.46, No.12, 2000, pp. 1554-1568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
  25. Gold, A. H., A. Malhotra, and A. H. Segars, "Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No.1, 2001, pp. 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  26. Hackman, J. R., "The design of work teams", in J. W. Lorcsh (ed.), Handbook of organization Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987, pp. 315-342.
  27. Hansen, M. T., "Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies", Organization Science, Vol.13, No.3, 2002, pp. 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
  28. Hollingshead, A. B., "Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.34, No.5, 1998, pp. 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
  29. Hollingshead, A. B., J. Fulk and P. Monge, "Fostering intranet knowledge sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches", in P. J. Hinds, S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002, pp. 335-355.
  30. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.
  31. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and A. Majchrzak, "Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks", Organization Science, Vol.19, No.2, 2008, pp. 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0315
  32. Kanawattanachai, P. and Y. Yoo, "The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time", MIS Quarterly, Vol.31, No.4, 2007, pp. 783-808. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148820
  33. Kankanhalli, A., B. C. Y. Tan, and K. K. Wei, "Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation", MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, 2005, pp. 113-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148670
  34. Kim, H. and J. Lee, "The influence of on-line social networking on performance of members in information system development projects", Information Systems Review, Vol.16, No.1, 2014, pp. 17-35. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2014.16.1.017
  35. Ko, D. G., L. J. Kirsch and W. R. King, "Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations", MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, 2005, pp. 59-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148668
  36. Laudon, K. C. and J. P. Laudon, 경영정보시스템, 시그마프레스, 2015.
  37. Laudon, K. C. and J. P. Laudon, Management Information Systems, Managing the Digital Firm (12th edition), Pearson, Boston, 2012.
  38. Lee, H. and B. Choi, "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.20, No.1, 2003, pp. 179-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
  39. Lewis, K., "Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems", Management Science, Vol.50, No.11, 2004, pp. 1519-1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
  40. Lewis, K., "Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.88, No.4, 2003, pp. 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
  41. Macintosh, A., "Position paper on knowledge asset management", 2015, Available at http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/~alm/kam.html, 1997, Retrieved September/.
  42. Moreland, R. L. and L. Argote, "Transactive memory in dynamic organizations", in R. S. Peterson and E. A. Mannix (eds.), Leading and Managing people in the Dynamic Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 135-162.
  43. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The KnowledgeCreating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
  44. Nonaka, I., "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation", Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, 1994, pp. 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  45. Ocean Tomo, "Annual study of intangible asset market value", 2015, Available at http://www.oce antomo.com/2015/03/04/2015-intangible-assetmarket-value-study/.
  46. Park, S., S. Yeon., D. Kim, and S. Kim, "A case study on building a system dynamics model for strategic knowledge management", Information Systems Review, Vol.7, No.2, 2005, pp. 101-105.
  47. Pfeffer, J. and R. I. Sutton, The Knowing and Doing Gap, Knowledge Nomad, 2010.
  48. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, 1966.
  49. Sparrow, B., J. Liu and D. M. Wegner, "Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips", Science, Vol.333, No.6043, 2011, pp. 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
  50. Sundstrom, E., K. P. De Meuse and D. Futrell, "Work teams: Applications and effectiveness", American Psychologist, Vol.45, No.2, 1990, pp. 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120
  51. Wegner, D. M., "Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind", in Mullen, B. and G. R. Goethals (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 185-208.
  52. Welbourne, T. M., D. E. Johnson and A. Erez, "The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41, No.5, 1998, pp. 540-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/256941
  53. Yoo, Y., R. J. Boland and K. Lyytinen, "From organization design to organization designing", Organization Science, Vol.17, No.2, 2006, pp. 215-229.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0168