참고문헌
- N.S. Rathore, N.L. Panwar, Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Development, New India Publishing, New Delhi, India, 2007.
- British Petroleum [Internet]. Annual review 2006 [cited 2007 Oct 8]. Available from: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/investors/bp-annual-review-2006.pdf.
- World UNDP, Energy Assessment 2000: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability, UNDP, New York, 2000.
- I.B. Fridleifsson, Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 5 (2001) 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00002-8
- Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Congressional Research Service, World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Power [Internet], in: Encyclopedia of Earth. Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington (DC), 2015 Aug 28. Available from: http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/154967.
- A.F. Ismail, M.S. Yim, Investigation of activated carbon adsorbent electrode for electrosorption-based uranium extractionfromseawater,Nucl. Eng.Technol 47 (2015)579-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.02.002
- I. Dincer, Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 4 (2000) 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8
- T. Smedley, Goodbye nuclear power: Germany's renewable energy revolution [Internet]. Published 2013 May 10. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/nuclear-power-germany-renewable-energy.
- C. Goodall, Ten Technologies to Save the Planet: Energy Options for a Low-Carbon Future, Greystone Books, London, UK, 2010.
- S.H. Lee, H.G. Kang, Integrated societal risk assessment framework for nuclear power and renewable energy sources, Nucl. Eng. Technol 47 (2015) 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.01.009
- J.H. Bae, Estimating the Effect and the Social Value on the Regional Economic Affected by the Regional Renewable [Korea Energy Economics Institute Report], Korea Energy Economics Institute, Ulsan, Korea, 2007.
- Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Nuclear Power Generation White Paper [Report], Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Seoul, Korea, 2011.
- G.Y. Huh, The Issues and Challenges About the Cost of Nuclear Power, National Assembly Budget Office Report, Seoul, Korea, 2014.
-
A. Jalil, S.F. Mahmud, Environment Kuznets curve for
$CO_2$ emissions: a cointegration analysis for China, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 5167-5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044 - G. Grossman, A. Krueger, Economic environment and the economic growth, Q. J. Econ. 110 (1995) 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
- T. Selden, D. Song, Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution, J. Environ. Econ. Manage 29 (1995) 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1038
- B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Litenstein, S. Read, B. Comb,Howsafe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits, Policy Sci. 9 (1978) 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
- P. Slovic, Perception of risk, Science 236 (1987) 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
- P. Slovic, The Perception of Risk, Earthscan Publication, London, UK, 2000.
- Y.P.Kim, B.S.Choi, Y.G.So, I.J. Jung, Risk perception in Koreaand policy implications, Korean Public Adm. Rev. 29 (1995) 935-956.
- A. Bergmann, S. Colombo, N. Hanley, Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments, Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008) 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.011
- OECD, Linking Renewable Energy to Rural Development, OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2012.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Net Energy Analysis of Different Electricity Generation Systems, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1994.
- R.L. San Martin, Environmental Emissions from Energy Technology Systems: The Total Fuel Cycle, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1989.
- J. McVeigh, D. Burtraw, J. Darmstadter, K. Palmer, Winner, loser, or innocent victim? Has renewable energy performed as expected? Solar Energy 68 (2000) 237-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(99)00073-0
- Economist [Internet]. Nuclear Power's New Age, 2007 [cited 2016 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/9767699.
- J.T. Murphy, Making the energy transition in rural East Africa: is leapfrogging an alternative? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 68 (2001) 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00091-8
- I.E.A. OECD, World Energy Outlook 2014, IEA Publications, Paris, France, 2014.
- A.M. Jaffe, The Changing Role of National Oil Companies in International Energy Markets [Baker Institute Policy Report], The Baker Institute Energy Forum, Rice University, Houston,TX, 2007.
- P. Stevens, National oil companies and international oil companies in the Middle East: under the shadow of government and the resource nationalism cycle, J. World Energy Law Bus. 1 (2008) 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwn004
- V. Vlado, Resource nationalism, bargaining and international oil companies: challenges and change in the new millennium, N. Polit. Econ. 14 (2009) 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903287322
- T.W. Walde, Renegotiating acquired rights in the oil and gas industries: industry and political cycles meet the rule of law, J. World Energy Law Bus 1 (2008) 55-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwn005
- N. De Graaff, A global energy network? he expansion and integration of non-triad national oil companies, in: Glob. Netw. 11, Wiley, 2011, pp. 262-283.
- A. Correlje, L. Coby Van der, Energy supply security and geopolitics: a European perspective, Energy Policy 34 (2006) 532-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.008
- D. Helm, The assessment: the new energy paradigm, Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 21 (2005) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri001
- F. Hoogeveen, P. Wilbur, Tomorrow's Mores. The International System, Geopolitical Changes and Energy, Clingendael International Energy Programme, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2005.
- C. van der Linde, Energy in a Changing World [Clingendael Energy Papers No. 11], Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
- J. Nolt, How harmful are the average American's greenhouse gas emissions? Ethics Policy Environ. 14 (2011) 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2011.561584
- D. Jamieson, Energy, Ethics and the Transformation of Nature, The Ethics of Global Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 2011.
- D. Jamieson, The moral and political challenges of climate change, in: Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 2007, pp. 475-482.
- J.C. Reboredo, A wavelet decomposition approach to crude oil price and exchange rate dependence, Econ. Model. 32 (2013) 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.028
- J.B. Lee, A theoretical approach to energy security: from the international political economy perspective of energy supply and demand, The Seoul Peace Prize Cult. Found. 2 (2005) 3-31.
- H.J. Do, The Energy Security Risk Assessment and Countermeasure in Relation to Variating the Condition of the World Energy Market [Korea Energy Economics Institute Report], Korea Energy Economics Institute, Ulsan, Korea, 2014.
- J.W. Choi, K.B. Yoon, Current status and development strategy for energy safety technology, J. Energy Eng 17 (2008) 175-184.
- W.M. Hannemann, Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66 (1984) 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
- K.Wertenbroch, S. Bernd, Measuring consumers' willingness to payat the point of purchase, J. Marketing Res. 39(2002)228-241. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.228.19086
- B. Mundy, D. McLean, Using the contingent value approach for natural resource and environmental damage applications, Appraisal J. 66 (1998) 88-99.
- N. Nomura, M. Akai, Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method, Appl. Energy 78 (2004) 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.10.001
- K. Ek, Public and private attitudes towards "green" electricity: the case of Swedish wind power, Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1677-1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005
- L.L. Wood, A.E. Kenyon, W.H. Desvousges, L.K. Morander, How much are customers willing to pay for improvements in health and environmental quality? Electric. J. 8 (1995) 70-77.
- J. Close, H. Pang, K.H. Lam, T. Li, 10% from renewables? the potential contribution from an HK schools PV installation programme, Renew. Energy 31 (2006) 1665-1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.08.033
- J. Zarnikau, Consumer demand for 'green power' and energy efficiency, Energy Policy 31 (2003) 1661-1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00232-X
- N. Hanley, C. Nevin, Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate Scotland, Energy Policy 27 (1999) 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00023-3
- S.L. Batley, D. Colbourne, P.D. Fleming, P. Urwin, Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market, Energy Policy 29 (2001) 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00142-7
- R. Wiser, Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles, Ecol. Econ. 62 (2007) 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.003
- A. Bergmann, N. Hanley, R. Wright, Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments, Energy Policy 34 (2006) 1004-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035
- Korea Energy Economics Institute, The estimation on the WTP about the renewable energy and study on the public acceptance about improvement plan [Report], Korea Energy Economics Institute, Ulsan, Korea, 2014.
- M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, B. Kanninen, Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73 (1991) 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
- A. Alberini, Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: single-bound, double-bound, and bivariate models, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 28 (1995) 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1019
- B.J. Kanninen, Bias in discrete response contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 28 (1995) 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1008
- T.S. Raghu, R.S. Sinha, A. Vinz, O. Burton, Willingness to pay in an open source software environment, Inf. Syst. Res. 20 (2009) 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0176
- S.H. Yoo, J.K. Lee, The study on the willingness to pay about the similar video on demand for education by using the robust semi-parametric estimation, The Korean Econ. Assoc. 48 (2000) 5-25.
- K.J. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, R.C. Bishop, Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: Comment, Land Econ 64 (1988), 98-98.
- P.O. Johansson, B. Kristrom, K.G. Maler, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: comment, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71 (1989) 1054-1056. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242684
- J.W. Duffield, D.A. Patterson, Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Land Econ. 67 (1991) 225-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146413
- R. Bishop, T. Heberlein, Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased? Am. J. Agric. Econ. 61 (1979) 926-930. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180348
- K. Willis, G. Garrod, C. Saunders, Benefits of environmentally sensitive area policy in England: a contingent valuation assessment, J. Environ. Manage. 44 (1995) 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1995.0034
- H.C. Lee, H.S. Chun, Valuing environment quality change on recreational hunting in Korea: a contingent valuation analysis, J. Environ. Manage. 57 (1999) 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0284
- Korea Power Exchange, Electric Market Statistics in 2014, Korea Power Exchange, 2015.
피인용 문헌
- Differentiated influences of benefit and risk perceptions on nuclear power acceptance according to acceptance levels: evidence from Korea vol.54, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1331767
- The factors of nuclear energy public acceptance and relative importance (public acceptance factors and relative importance) vol.12, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1227887
- Effect of Fukushima accident on public acceptance of nuclear energy (Fukushima accident and nuclear public acceptance) vol.12, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1230797
- The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea vol.49, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.10.007
- Big Data Analysis of Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power in Korea vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.12.015
- Differentiated influences of risk perceptions on nuclear power acceptance according to acceptance targets: Evidence from Korea vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.04.005
- Estimation of Ecological Compensation Standards for Fallow Heavy Metal-Polluted Farmland in China Based on Farmer Willingness to Accept vol.9, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101859
- Economic Feasibility Analysis for Renewable Energy Project Using an Integrated TFN-AHP-DEA Approach on the Basis of Consumer Utility vol.10, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122089
- Opportunities and Challenges of Solar and Wind Energy in South Korea: A Review vol.10, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061822
- Financial Feasibility and Social Acceptance for Reducing Nuclear Power Plants: A Contingent Valuation Study vol.10, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113833
- Factors affecting the transition of the Polish power system vol.108, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910801001
- Model of nuclear energy valuation in the context of e-mobility vol.13, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0108
- Evaluation and forecasting of solar radiation using time series adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system: Seoul city as a case study vol.13, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5709
- Strategic Market Growth and Policy Recommendations for Sustainable Solar Energy Deployment in South Korea vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-019-00331-6
- Economic valuation of natural promenades in Iran using zonal travel costs method (Case study area: Gahar Lake in Lorestan Province in western Iran) vol.15, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241396