Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Uranium Enrichment Reduction in the Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR) with PBO Reflector

  • Kim, Chihyung (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Hartanto, Donny (Fast Reactor Design Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)) ;
  • Kim, Yonghee (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2015.10.16
  • Accepted : 2016.01.02
  • Published : 2016.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Korean Prototype Gen-IV sodium-cooled fast reactor (PGSFR) is supposed to be loaded with a relatively-costly low-enriched U fuel, while its envisaged transuranic fuels are not available for transmutation. In this work, the U-enrichment reduction by improving the neutron economy is pursued to save the fuel cost. To improve the neutron economy of the core, a new reflector material, PbO, has been introduced to replace the conventional HT9 reflector in the current PGSFR core. Two types of PbO reflectors are considered: one is the conventional pin-type and the other one is an inverted configuration. The inverted PbO reflector design is intended to maximize the PbO volume fraction in the reflector assembly. In addition, the core radial configuration is also modified to maximize the performance of the PbO reflector. For the baseline PGSFR core with several reflector options, the U enrichment requirement has been analyzed and the fuel depletion analysis is performed to derive the equilibrium cycle parameters. The linear reactivity model is used to determine the equilibrium cycle performances of the core. Impacts of the new PbO reflectors are characterized in terms of the cycle length, neutron leakage, radial power distribution, and operational fuel cost.

Keywords

References

  1. IAEA, Advanced Reactor Technology Options for Utilization and Transmutation of Actinides in Spent Nuclear Fuel, TECDOC-1626, 2009.
  2. A.E. Waltar, D.R. Todd, P.V. Tsvetkov, Fast Spectrum Reactors, Springer, New York, 2012.
  3. J.H. Lee, Preliminary Conceptual Design Report of Gen-IV Prototype SFR. SFR-010-DA-307-001, KAERI, Daejeon, Korea, 2013.
  4. J. Ahn, Roles and effects of pyroprocessing for spent nuclear fuel management in South Korea, Prog. Nucl. Energy 75 (2014) 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.003
  5. D. Hartanto, Y. Kim, Alternative reflectors for a compact sodium-cooled breed-and-burn fast reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 76 (2014) 113-124.
  6. J. Leppanen, Serpent-a Continuous Energy, Monte Carlo Reactor Physics Burnup Calculation Code User's Manual, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2013.
  7. H.K. Joo, Status of Fast Reactor Technology Development in Korea. The 48th IAEA TWG-FR Meeting, Obninsk, Russia, 2015 May 25-29.
  8. R.R. Macdonald, M.J. Driscoll, Magnesium oxide: an improved reflector for blanket-free fast reactors, in: Transactions of American Nuclear Society, vol. 102, June 13-17, San Diego, CA, 2010, pp. 488-489.
  9. Nuclear Energy Agency, JANIS Java-based Nuclear Data Information System, [cited 2014 Dec 29]. Available from:https://www.oecd-nea.org/janis/.
  10. G. Hofman, L.C. Walters, T.H. Bauer, Metallic fast reactor fuels, Prog. Nucl. Energy 31 (1997) 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(96)00005-4
  11. M.J. Driscoll, T.J. Downar, E.E. Pilat, The Linear Reactivity Model for Nuclear Fuel Management, American Nuclear Society Press, La Grange Park, Illinois, 1990.
  12. L.R. Lamarsh, A.J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, third ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001.
  13. UxC Nuclear Fuel Price Indicators, [cited 2014 Dec 29]. Available from:http://www.uxc.com/review/UxCPrices.aspx.

Cited by

  1. Fabrication of U-10 wt.%Zr Metallic Fuel Rodlets for Irradiation Test in BOR-60 Fast Reactor vol.2016, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4385925
  2. Ceramic plasma-spray-coated graphite crucible for injection casting of fast reactor fuel slugs vol.15, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12851
  3. A STUDY OF LEAKAGE-CORRECTED TWO-STEP METHOD BASED ON THE NODAL EQUIVALENCE THEORY FOR FAST REACTOR ANALYSIS vol.247, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702026
  4. Study on the Sensitivity and Uncertainty of Nuclear Data to the Sodium-Cooled Linear Breed-and-Burn Fast Reactor Using SCALE6.2 Code vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9997867