References
- Huber KE, Carey LA, Wazer DE. Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2009;19:204-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2009.05.004
- Lam SW, Jimenez CR, Boven E. Breast cancer classification by proteomic technologies: current state of knowledge. Cancer Treat Rev 2014;40:129-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.06.006
- Guiu S, Michiels S, Andre F, Cortes J, Denkert C, Di Leo A, et al. Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement. Ann Oncol 2012;23:2997-3006 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds586
- Jiang L, Ma T, Moran MS, Kong X, Li X, Haffty BG, et al. Mammographic features are associated with clinicopathological characteristics in invasive breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2011;31:2327-2334
- Tamaki K, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Amari M, Ohuchi N, Tamaki N, et al. Correlation between mammographic findings and corresponding histopathology: potential predictors for biological characteristics of breast diseases. Cancer Sci 2011;102:2179-2185 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02088.x
- Killelea BK, Chagpar AB, Bishop J, Horowitz NR, Christy C, Tsangaris T, et al. Is there a correlation between breast cancer molecular subtype using receptors as surrogates and mammographic appearance? Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:3247-3253 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3155-7
- American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
- Alexander MC, Yankaskas BC, Biesemier KW. Association of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:29-37 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.0582
- Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO, Cornford E. Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1377-1380 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0725
- Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Burrell HC, James JJ, Lee AH, et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:676-683 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1950
- Yamaguchi J, Ohtani H, Nakamura K, Shimokawa I, Kanematsu T. Prognostic impact of marginal adipose tissue invasion in ductal carcinoma of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:382-388 https://doi.org/10.1309/MX6KKA1UNJ1YG8VN
- Moriuchi H, Yamaguchi J, Hayashi H, Ohtani H, Shimokawa I, Abiru H, et al. Cancer cell interaction with adipose tissue: correlation with the finding of spiculation at mammography. Radiology 2016;279:56-64 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142191
- Tchou J, Kossenkov AV, Chang L, Satija C, Herlyn M, Showe LC, et al. Human breast cancer associated fibroblasts exhibit subtype specific gene expression profiles. BMC Med Genomics 2012;5:39 https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-39
- Park SY, Kim HM, Koo JS. Differential expression of cancer-associated fibroblast-related proteins according to molecular subtype and stromal histology in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;149:727-741 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3291-9
- Bare M, Tora N, Salas D, Sentis M, Ferrer J, Ibanez J, et al. Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;154:403-415 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3623-9
Cited by
- BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications: prediction of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer vol.8, pp.18, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16318
- RE: Is There a Correlation between the Presence of a Spiculated Mass on Mammogram and Luminal A Subtype Breast Cancer? vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.551
- Sonographic Features of Estrogen-Negative Breast Cancers: A Correlation Study With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Type II Overexpression vol.34, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479318792043
- Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Screening: Rationale, Concept, and Transfer to Clinical Practice vol.70, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-121417-100403
- Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial vol.293, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190132
- Optoacoustic imaging of the breast: correlation with histopathology and histopathologic biomarkers vol.29, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06262-0
- Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0251-3
- Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77053-7
- Predicting Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer with Mammography and Ultrasound Findings: Introduction of Sono-Mammometry Score vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6691958
- SAP‐cGAN: Adversarial learning for breast mass segmentation in digital mammogram based on superpixel average pooling vol.48, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14671
- A multicenter study on radiomic features from T2‐weighted images of a customized MR pelvic phantom setting the basis for robust radiomic models in clinics vol.85, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28521
- Characteristics of Invasive Breast Cancer Detected by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Screening and Diagnostic Mammograms vol.72, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537119888389