Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Staged versus One-Time Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy for Multivessel Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

  • Kim, Yun Gi (Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Hong, Soon Jun (Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.09.12
  • Accepted : 2016.10.18
  • Published : 2016.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Fuster V, Moreno PR, Fayad ZA, Corti R, Badimon JJ. Atherothrombosis and high-risk plaque: part I: evolving concepts. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:937-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.074
  2. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2333
  3. Shishehbor MH, Lauer MS, Singh IM, et al. In unstable angina or non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culpritonly stenting? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:849-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.054
  4. Kim MC, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. What is optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Multivessel or culprit-only revascularization. Int J Cardiol 2011;153:148-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.044
  5. Yu X, Li Y, Wang Q, Liang M, Xu K, Han Y. "One-time" versus staged multivessel intervention in intermediate to very high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Korean Circ J 2016;46:774-83. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.6.774
  6. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:704-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071
  7. Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:692-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046
  8. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017
  9. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Staged versus one-time complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:12-20. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.974485
  10. Blankenship JC, Moussa ID, Chambers CC, et al. Staging of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions: an expert consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;79:1138-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23353