Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio with Plaque Morphology in Patients with Asymptomatic Intermediate Carotid Artery Stenosis

  • Yuksel, Isa Oner (Clinic of Cardiology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Koklu, Erkan (Clinic of Cardiology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Arslan, Sakir (Clinic of Cardiology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Cagirci, Goksel (Clinic of Cardiology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Goksu, Eylem Ozaydin (Clinic of Neurology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Koc, Pinar (Clinic of Radiology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Cay, Serkan (Clinic of Cardiology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital) ;
  • Kizilirmak, Filiz (Department of Cardiology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.11.16
  • Accepted : 2016.02.16
  • Published : 2016.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Non-calcified carotid plaques are more unstable than calcified plaques, and they are associated with a higher risk of rupture, thromboembolism, and consequently, stroke. The purpose of the present study is to compare calcified and non-calcified plaques that cause intermediate carotid artery stenosis with respect to neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Subjects and Methods: A total number of 139 asymptomatic patients with 50-70% stenosis of the carotid artery were included in this study. Carotid Doppler ultrasound imaging and computed tomography angiography were performed to divide the carotid artery plaques into two groups as calcified and non-calcified. Patients included in the calcified (n=73) and non-calcified (n=66) plaque groups were compared with respect to total neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and NLR. Results: Total lymphocyte count was statistically significantly lower in the non-calcified plaque group compared to the calcified plaque group (total lymphocyte count in non-calcified/calcified plaque groups [$10^3/mm^3$]: 2.1/2.3, respectively) (p=0.002). NLR was statistically significantly higher in the non-calcified plaque group compared to the calcified plaque group (NLR in non-calcified/calcified plaque groups: 2.6/2.1, respectively) (p<0.001). The cut-off value for NLR was found to be >2.54. Multivariate regression analysis showed that NLR was independently associated with non-calcified carotid artery plaques (odds ratio 5.686, 95% CI 2.498-12.944, p<0.001). Conclusions: NLR is increased in the presence of non-calcified carotid artery plaques that cause asymptomatic intermediate stenosis. Increased NLR can be used as a marker to assess the risk of rupture of non-calcified carotid artery plaques.

Keywords

References

  1. Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke 2008;39:2396-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505776
  2. Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MA Jr. Endothelial expression of a mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecule during atherogenesis. Science 1991;251:788-91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1990440
  3. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, et al. The thin-cap fibroatheroma: A type of vulnerable plaque: The major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 2001;16: 285-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200109000-00006
  4. Drechsler M, Megens RT, van Zandvoort M, Weber C, Soehnlein O. Hyperlipidemia-triggered neutrophilia promotes early atherosclerosis. Circulation 2010;122:1837-45. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.961714
  5. Larionov S, Dedeck O, Birkenmeier G, Thal DR. Expression of alpha2-macroglobulin, neutrophil elastase, and interleukin-1alpha differs in early-stage and late-stage atherosclerotic lesions in the arteries of the circle of Willis. Acta Neuropathol 2007;113:33-43.
  6. Leclercq A, Houard X, Philippe M, et al. Involvement of intraplaque hemorrhage in atherothrombosis evolution via neutrophil protease enrichment. J Leukoc Biol 2007;82:1420-9. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1106671
  7. Thomson SP, Gibbons RJ, Smars PA, et al. Incremental value of the leukocyte differential and the rapid creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme or the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:335-41. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00003
  8. Dragu R, Khoury S, Zuckerman R, et al. Predictive value of white blood cell subtypes for long-term outcome following myocardial inrafction. Atherosclerosis 2008;196:405-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.11.022
  9. Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, Rogers EK, Eagle KA, Gurm HS. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:653-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.006
  10. Gokhan S, Ozhasenekler A, Mansur Durgun H, Akil E, Ustundag M, Orak M. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratios in stroke subtypes and transient ischemic attack. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:653-7.
  11. Gibson PH, Cuthbertson BH, Croal BL, et al. Usefulness of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:186-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.007
  12. Ahmadi N, Nabavi V, Hajsadeghi F, et al. Mortality incidence of patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by computed tomography angiography. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:10-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.034
  13. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O, et al. Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2622-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp272
  14. Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T, et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:404-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.015
  15. Hunt JL, Fairman R, Mitchell ME, et al. Bone formation in carotid plaques: a clinicopathological study. Stroke 2002;33:1214-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000013741.41309.67
  16. van Lammeren GW, den Hartog AG, Pasterkamp G, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: identification of subgroups with different underlying plaque characteristics. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43:632-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.011
  17. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37(4 Suppl):1-19.
  18. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1002-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.005
  19. Wang PQ, Wang Y, Zhang GB, Zhou PY, Liu JZ, Wang SA. Study on the carotid atherosclerotic plaque of patients suffering from ischemic cerebrovascular disease by 64 slices CT. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:3480-5.
  20. Mathers CD, Boerma T, Ma Fat D. Global and regional causes of death. Br Med Bull 2009;92:7-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp028
  21. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:2045-51. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179705
  22. Nasr N, Ruidavets JB, Arnal JF, Sie P, Larrue V. Association of neutrophil count with microembolization in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Atherosclerosis 2009;207:519-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.05.003
  23. Ionita MG, van den Borne P, Catanzariti LM, et al. High neutrophil numbers in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques are associated with characteristics of rupture-prone lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:1842-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209296
  24. Onsrud M, Thorsby E. Influence of in vivo hydrocortisone on some humab blood lymphocyte subpopulations. Effect on natural killer cell activity. Scand J Immunol 1981;13:573-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.1981.tb00171.x
  25. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:138-50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra021333
  26. Pellizzon GG, Dixon SR, Gregg W, et al; Stent PAMI Investigators. Relation of admission white blood cell count to long-term outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (The Stent PAMI Trial). Am J Cardiol 2003;91:729-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03416-1
  27. Naruko T, Ueda M, Haze K, et al. Neutrophil infiltration of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2002;106:2894 -900. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000042674.89762.20
  28. Tavora FR, Ripple M, Li L, Burke AP. Monocytes and neutrophils expressing myeloperoxidase occur in fibrous caps and thrombi in unstable coronary plaques. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2009;9:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-9-27
  29. Bozzao A, Floris R, Pocek M, Fasoli F, Garaci FG, Simonetti G. Noninvasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiograph. Radiol Med 2001;101:48-53.
  30. Hingwala D, Kesavadas C, Sylaja PN, Thomas B, Kapilamoorthy TR. Multimodality imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Going beyond stenosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2013;23:24-34.

Cited by

  1. Thrombosis, Neuroinflammation, and Poststroke Infection: The Multifaceted Role of Neutrophils in Stroke vol.2017, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5140679
  2. Panoramic imaged carotid atheromas are associated with increased neutrophil count: both validated, independent predictors of near-term myocardial infarction vol.50, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210045
  3. Correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and stability of carotid plaques vol.212, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107055
  4. NETosis in ischemic/reperfusion injuries: An organ-based review vol.290, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120158